I meant more in terms of what he did with Turkey's economy, and how he gradually moved Turkey away from what I call radical secularism.
As for Turkey taking a step back in terms of human rights and democracy, I don't think that is true in general, overall I would definitely not say that Turkey is less free or less democratic than it used to be before the AKP. The media's bias I imagine would stem mostly from the fact that actions taken by a prime minister who is perceived to be an Islamist would be viewed more negatively than the same actions if they were taken by someone who's perceived as a secularist. That's my interpretation at least.
Although that being said, some of the things the AKP government did, and the way they dealt with protests for example would probably be unacceptable when held against Western standards, and rightfully so, governments should always be held to the highest standards possible, but overall I wouldn't agree that Turkey is worse off as a whole in terms of human rights and democracy than it was prior to 2002 even though you feel the western media would like to paint it that way.
I also think there is a fundamental lack of understanding of the differing Islamist ideologies in western media, it's lazy intellectually to lump all Islamist leaning ideologies under one umbrella. Kao Ray's suggestion that Erdogan's support for radical militant jihadist groups is in any way even remotely linked to ideology is an absolutely preposterous one IMO, yet it's an idea I've seen bandied around in media freely and very commonly.
As for Turkey taking a step back in terms of human rights and democracy, I don't think that is true in general, overall I would definitely not say that Turkey is less free or less democratic than it used to be before the AKP. The media's bias I imagine would stem mostly from the fact that actions taken by a prime minister who is perceived to be an Islamist would be viewed more negatively than the same actions if they were taken by someone who's perceived as a secularist. That's my interpretation at least.
Although that being said, some of the things the AKP government did, and the way they dealt with protests for example would probably be unacceptable when held against Western standards, and rightfully so, governments should always be held to the highest standards possible, but overall I wouldn't agree that Turkey is worse off as a whole in terms of human rights and democracy than it was prior to 2002 even though you feel the western media would like to paint it that way.
I also think there is a fundamental lack of understanding of the differing Islamist ideologies in western media, it's lazy intellectually to lump all Islamist leaning ideologies under one umbrella. Kao Ray's suggestion that Erdogan's support for radical militant jihadist groups is in any way even remotely linked to ideology is an absolutely preposterous one IMO, yet it's an idea I've seen bandied around in media freely and very commonly.
