Because it is a policy for the richest and this leads to a tax injustice, it's not normal for a guy like Ronaldo to end up paying a tax on 16% of his income while a middle-class person will be taxed more than Ronaldo in proportion to his income. With this kind of politics this will do as in France a social anger will appear in Italy because all these fiascals gifts it will be necessary that someone pay them.
This is kind of true but there's the other side of the medal.
First, I wouldn't call it a fiscal gift. If we speak about the policy of paying only 100k in taxes for all the income made OUTSIDE Italy, how is it a gift? I remind you it applies only to the newcomers who haven't been living in Italy before so before Italy was getting nothing. Now instead, they will have those 100k plus VAT income from all the purchases these rich people make within Italy. By making all these purchases they are also boosting the economy because there is a higher demand for goods (cars, yachts, real estate etc).
The same applies for lower taxes for big wealth made within Italy (football players in this example). These people will rather stay in Italy to spend or invest their money there.
Consequently, isn't it more profitable for the state to offer lower taxes for the very rich people who will in turn come to Italy in numbers to spend and invest their money than to have much fewer rich people and tax them hard?
In my opinion the ordinary people would also benefit from that but they need to see the big picture.
Wysłane z mojego FRD-L09 przy użyciu Tapatalka