Summer Mercato Thread 2019-20 (48 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jun 6, 2015
11,391
Acting like a drama queen about potentially using a 4-3-1-2 that had us play a CL final a few years ago... even the calm level-headed ones losing their shit right now. Lol
Yeah even this season we've played with Mandzo, Ronaldo and Dybala/Berna starting at the same time for most of the season. Pretty sure that in some games Dybala/Berna have played between the lines behind Ronaldo and Mandzo when we attack. Then defensively we always change to 4-4-2. Why does it make us worse in defense if we attack with 4-3-1-2 vs 4-3-3?
 

Post Ironic

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2013
42,253
Yeah even this season we've played with Mandzo, Ronaldo and Dybala/Berna starting at the same time for most of the season. Pretty sure that in some games Dybala/Berna have played between the lines behind Ronaldo and Mandzo when we attack. Then defensively we always change to 4-4-2. Why does it make us worse in defense if we attack with 4-3-1-2 vs 4-3-3?
Cuz MikeM hates outdated non-winger based formations.

Not sure why he thinks 4-3-3 means we will suddenly be more solid defensively. Half the top teams that use it don’t ask their wingers to track back much anyways, so I guess they are defending with only 7... :boh:
 

MikeM

Footballing Hipster celebrating 4th place with Tuz
Sep 21, 2008
12,849
Cuz MikeM hates outdated non-winger based formations.

Not sure why he thinks 4-3-3 means we will suddenly be more solid defensively. Half the top teams that use it don’t ask their wingers to track back much anyways, so I guess they are defending with only 7... :boh:
Some of these teams have wingers that don't exactly put in challenges, I agree. But they cover (like literally just occupy space) the wide areas so the CMs can all stay compact in the centre of the pitch. In a 4-3-1-2, how do you help De Sciglio defend? You have to bring a CM all the way out wide? It's so hard. That's why it's uncommon.

Then the issue of when the CAM goes into the box. It helps to be Vidal who goes for a header and then sprints back beside Pirlo. Just think how we got murdered by Ajax with 2 banks of four but then eliminate even one more player so it's a bank of 3 and a bank of 4? There's no way IMO.

This is not even talking about the attack, which is so much harder. Again, imagine De Sciglio with the ball and how does he pass it out of our 3rd? Well it's going to have to be a striker that drifts all the way wide to receive the ball, in which case he's playing as a winger anyway! So put a winger there!

Wingers :tuttosport:


^^^ So if you pass to the fullback, either a CM or a ST has to act as a winger. You can't avoid passing the ball into wide areas. So why would we want players uncomfortable in those areas, constantly in those areas? Just put a winger. Preferably Hazard. :tuttosport:


Edit: Also really hard to press the opponent. What happens when they pass to their fullback? A striker or CM has to go there. So just put a winger, e fatta.
 
Last edited:

Post Ironic

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2013
42,253
Some of these teams have wingers that don't exactly put in challenges, I agree. But they cover (like literally just occupy space) the wide areas so the CMs can all stay compact in the centre of the pitch. In a 4-3-1-2, how do you help De Sciglio defend? You have to bring a CM all the way out wide? It's so hard. That's why it's uncommon.

Then the issue of when the CAM goes into the box. It helps to be Vidal who goes for a header and then sprints back beside Pirlo. Just think how we got murdered by Ajax with 2 banks of four but then eliminate even one more player so it's a bank of 3 and a bank of 4? There's no way IMO.

This is not even talking about the attack, which is so much harder. Again, imagine De Sciglio with the ball and how does he pass it out of our 3rd? Well it's going to have to be a striker that drifts all the way wide to receive the ball, in which case he's playing as a winger anyway! So put a winger there!

Wingers :tuttosport:

Edit: Also really hard to press the opponent. What happens when they pass to their fullback? A striker or CM has to go there. So just put a winger, e fatta.



^^^ So if you pass to the fullback, either a CM or a ST has to act as a winger, so just put a winger. Preferably Hazard. :tuttosport:
I know you are obsessed with wingers. ;)

I just don’t have as big an issue with 4-3-1-2 given the right players to play it. Right now, we have nowhere near the midfield strength to play it. It’s also a formation that creates a lot through the middle of the pitch as was seen during Allegri’s first year here, which was a pleasure to watch.

Seeing as Ronaldo rarely positioned wide as an actual winger at Madrid, that team could hardly be said to be playing a 4-3-3 in terms of how they were actually positioned on the pitched. It looked much more like a lopsided 4-4-2 when Bale/another winger played, or like a 4-3-1-2 I attack when Isco played.

- - - Updated - - -

Anyways, I’m fine with whatever gets the most of our squad. Perhaps that would have been 4-3-3 this year if Costa hadn’t gone full retard... or perhaps it would have been something a little more 4-4-2/4-2-1-3 shape with our lack of CMs and surplus of attackers.

Would like to see Berna as a CAM still in 4-2-1-3/3-1 or as a wide mid in 4-4-2. Have a 4 man attack with Ronaldo, Kean, Costa, Berna all on the pitch together would be something I’d love to see.
 

IlCapitano

Senior Member
Dec 16, 2012
5,614
4-3-1-2 will hemorrhage goals in the UCL. It's even weaker than whatever Max is playing nowadays. Now he will ask the CAM to run like prime Vidal to get back into the midfield 4, so if we're lucky we'll be defending with 8 but sometimes only with 7?

Fuck sake, just build a proper 4-3-3 with Ronaldo at striker and some pacey wingers so you can at least defend and counter, and make the game easier for yourself. It's not like we do anything intricate with CR7 on the wing anyways, half his goals were just jumping over defenders. Just put him in the box permanently. Sometimes switch and play him beside Kean.
If Ramsey, Ndombele and Can are the runners we won't have any problems at all. Even Pjanić is a better runner than Pirlo because of age.

And I especially don't see the concerns with build up, getting the strikers involved etc. 4312 is when we played our best football and in which Dybala flourished if he stays. Zidane also used it a lot at RM, so CR knows what it's about.

It also uses FBs overlapping a lot so we could see the old Sandro again

- - - Updated - - -

You didn't make a point. I have nothing to refute. Your opinion is not a fact FFS!

Neymar is also a diving diva, so should we not buy him if we had a chance?

Dybala is our player, and he's had a frustrating season, as have many others. I don't see you guys shitting on De Sciglio or Bonucci (probably because they're Italians) but I guess it's because "Evil Dybala" wears our number 10 jersey and should be giving more to justify his salary and his jersey number.
You my dude are all over the place. My point was simply that it was hilarious the way you insulted James when you defend Dybala who's done way worse. Then you got your panties in a bunch. I didn't mention selling Dybala, didn't mention Neymar or anyone, so Idk what you're on about. Cheers
 
Last edited:

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,703
Dybala, Higuain or Cancelo for Icardi?
By Football Italia staff


It’s been reported that Juventus could consider offering one of Paulo Dybala, Gonzalo Higuain or Joao Cancelo plus money in exchange for Mauro Icardi.
According to newspaper La Repubblica, the possibility for any potential move could be discussed tonight after the Derby d’Italia game between the sides at the San Siro.
Calciomercato.com report that Bianconeri sporting director Fabio Paratici would like to bring Icardi to Turin, but neither he nor Inter CEO Beppe Marotta will make the first move.
Dybala has been suggested as part of an exchange for several weeks now, but La Joya seems reticent to make the move to Inter.
Higuain is likely to be sent back to Juve after his disappointing loan spells at Milan and then Chelsea.
It’d be a return to Inter for Cancelo, who was at San Siro last season on loan with €40m option to buy from Valencia.
Should the Portuguese full-back return to the Nerazzurri, it would rule out a move for Manchester City’s Brazilian defender Danilo, who they have been recently linked to.
Meanwhile, Icardi’s wife and agent Wanda Nara has been adamant in recent days that she and her husband are 100% staying at Inter as they have just bought some valuable real estate in the Repubblica area of the city.
The family plan to move there in September and Wanda will transfer her office to the area. Without any other concrete offers, it can’t be ruled out that the 26-year-old will stay in Milan for another year.
 

fredrik

Senior Member
Aug 7, 2011
7,239
Yes. Mandzukic has been on fire these past 4 months :baus: :tup:

We could replay that 2nd leg against Ajax 100 times, and we'd probably lose 99 times.

We were not prepared, neither physically nor mentally.
Are you out of your mind? It would be the other way, no doubt. Ajax had a fantastic game with inform team, we had the opposite....one a normal day we are clearly a stronger team than ajax. Chillini was the only thing missing from safe progression from cl.
 

Bianconero81

Ageing Veteran
Jan 26, 2009
40,177
Are you out of your mind? It would be the other way, no doubt. Ajax had a fantastic game with inform team, we had the opposite....one a normal day we are clearly a stronger team than ajax. Chillini was the only thing missing from safe progression from cl.
Did you read the rest of my post? We were not ready. We were not prepared. That's why I said, given the circumstances, had we played that same game in the same circumstances, we'd have lost 99 times out of 100.

With a fully fit squad and Chiellini in the side, we would've won.
 

fredrik

Senior Member
Aug 7, 2011
7,239
Did you read the rest of my post? We were not ready. We were not prepared. That's why I said, given the circumstances, had we played that same game in the same circumstances, we'd have lost 99 times out of 100.

With a fully fit squad and Chiellini in the side, we would've won.
Ok:) than we agree. If everthing was the same it would be 1-2 every time though
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 39)