well in my eyes he is an out and out striker, he does not have the attributes to be anything else.
i dont know how it changed it to a 442 when hes a defender and he was brought on for a midfielder, it just seems tht there were a lot of ppl out of position
why would he be given credit for starting chiellini on the left? now we have 2 centrebacks thats where he plays, i dont think there was really any other option, he would never leave chiellini out of the squad.
so with a more solid midfield we would have put more pressure on the defence? i really dont get that reasoning at all, a 4-3-3 is more vulenerable to counters than a 4-4-2
i agree we deserved to lose that game, we were poor
i dont know how it changed it to a 442 when hes a defender and he was brought on for a midfielder, it just seems tht there were a lot of ppl out of position
why would he be given credit for starting chiellini on the left? now we have 2 centrebacks thats where he plays, i dont think there was really any other option, he would never leave chiellini out of the squad.
so with a more solid midfield we would have put more pressure on the defence? i really dont get that reasoning at all, a 4-3-3 is more vulenerable to counters than a 4-4-2
i agree we deserved to lose that game, we were poor
abt chiellini, he was on the bench in the last game for Balzaretti.Balzaretti played better this season on that left flank, and DD made a decision to field Chiellini there to cover Papa Waigo and it was spot on.
Abt the formation....With that formation you put out , you call that a more solid midfield? It has no holding players and actually that was the formation DD played with but with marchionni and neddy in the middle(where they should be considering it is 433)
I said it before, my only problem with DD is not starting Bianco or Venitucci with would've given us a more stable midfield as they are less attack minded players that Marchisio.And it would allow Marchisio to have a freer role
