He will never see our viewpoint. It is best to let him reside in his delusional world, where there is an explanation for everything. In fact there is, but some reasons and expalantions are more logical and convincing than others. I am yet to be convicned by your assessment; as a matter of fact, you are about as unconvincing as Ranieri's tactial choices and substitutions.
For every argument he makes, I can come up with a counter argument. Tolerance exists, but there is also something called tolerance threshold. Ever heard of it? If you are unhappy with something you need to speak up. You need to be intelligent as well as tolerant. You can't accept something, when nothing is going right, or you are mired in shit, and preach tolerance. This goes against your quest for logical reasoning, and the need to analyze everyhintg, doesn't it?
For every argument he makes, I can come up with a counter argument. Tolerance exists, but there is also something called tolerance threshold. Ever heard of it? If you are unhappy with something you need to speak up. You need to be intelligent as well as tolerant. You can't accept something, when nothing is going right, or you are mired in shit, and preach tolerance. This goes against your quest for logical reasoning, and the need to analyze everyhintg, doesn't it?
