Editorial by Guido Vaciago from Tuttosport:
No one dare to say that we discovered about the “fictitious” plusvalenze and the pre-orders using the intercepts from the Turin Prosecutor.
To program them in advance, calculating which number is needed to help the accounts through a systematic mechanism which has upset so much the Federal Court of Appeals is a well-established practice in the Italian football at the point of having its Champions or, even better, its “King”, like Piero #Ausilio, the esteemed sporting director of #Inter, one of the best in the mercato and in the youth management who, on July 2nd 2019 was called the «the king of the plusvalenze» and not by “hostile” or “opposing” media, but from fcinter1908.it or fcinternews.it. According to the celebratory news, the owners of #Inter had determined that 40M€ were needed and the director started to do plusvalenze and succeeded at it.
Sifting throughTransfertmarkt one can learn that #Vanheusden was sold in the summer of 2019 to #StandardLiege for 11.74M€, and then bought back by #Inter on July 13th 2021 for 16.2M€ (when his value according to the website was only 2). #Pinamonti was bought by #Genoa on Sept 1st 2020 at 19.5M€ (estimated value at 13.5) and then on Sept 18th 2020 he was bought back by #Inter for 21M€. None, let it be clear, none of these deals were illegal and violated any rules. Unless if one sees it as what is being claimed that arranging the plusvalenze and then putting them into action in a systematic way would be a serious violation of Article 4.
[@averagejuventinoguy]