[SCO] Scottish Premier league 2010/2011 (5 Viewers)

Bozi

The Bozman
Administrator
Oct 18, 2005
22,748
:mad: Hey! I live on the west coast! (I'm further west than Glasgow; - thats nearer the middle than the coast!)
where do you live about Ange? must be murder listening to wee lennys winging and walters order of the establishment every day




so in a twist of fate more ironic than Amauri claiming he can score 20 goals,Hearts have re-signed Andy "Judas" Webster! the same Andy "Judas" Webster of Article 17 AKA the "Webster" ruling.
a guy that walked out on Hearts with a year of his contract to run,screwing Hearts out of a £4m+ transfer fee and screwing Scottish 2nd division side Arbroath out of a payday that could have secured their future for around about 5 years. as you may have guessed my feeling on ANdy "Judas" Webster have been venomous from that day,in fact he is the only player i have EVER hated.

now i have to temper those feelings with the reality that he is again a Hearts player and he is also of better quality than those that currently fill the CB positions. i will never boo a Hearts player,but make no mistake,he has a lot of work to do to win me over
 

Red

-------
Moderator
Nov 26, 2006
47,023
Doesn't mean it was a bad tackle.

Aberdeen player had his ankle broken a few weeks ago, and the challenge that broke it was a fair one.

It was just unfortunate.
 

Lorena

Senior Member
Dec 11, 2010
1,366
Doesn't mean it was a bad tackle.

Aberdeen player had his ankle broken a few weeks ago, and the challenge that broke it was a fair one.

It was just unfortunate.
It was unfortunate,but he had no intention of touching the ball so it should be red card.
 

Red

-------
Moderator
Nov 26, 2006
47,023
Booking was correct.

That tackle was no worse than heaps you see every week. It's just bad luck/very funny that he got badly injured.

And Black is a player who has a reputation in Scotland for being an aggressive player, so if there was any suggestion that it was a deliberate effort to injure the player, the ref would have sent him off and there would have been a ban.
 

Bozi

The Bozman
Administrator
Oct 18, 2005
22,748
For how many games was suspended that Hearts player that broke Jelavic's leg?
:lol: he never broke his leg,he strained ankle ligaments and he is back playing already

Booking was correct.

That tackle was no worse than heaps you see every week. It's just bad luck/very funny that he got badly injured.

And Black is a player who has a reputation in Scotland for being an aggressive player, so if there was any suggestion that it was a deliberate effort to injure the player, the ref would have sent him off and there would have been a ban.
Black seems to have this "reputation" but he is nowhere near as bad as Lee McCulloch.
Rangers fans have been slavering all sorts of shit about his tackle on Diouf the other night,i was watching with my sisters Rangers "following" fiance (i don't say supporting as like most Gers fans i know he does not attend games,he simply buys the occasional top and acts like a smug prick when he hears his team won on the radio) and he didn't even think it was a booking

Gourock (20+ miles west of Glasgow) I don't have to listen to them very often. Most people around me don't like bigotry and we rarely talk about the old firm.
oh my god you aint all Morton fans are you? :eek:
 

gray

Senior Member
Moderator
Apr 22, 2003
30,260
Looking forward to having Ki and Cha back in the Celtic lineup, so I have something to watch again :p
 

Bozi

The Bozman
Administrator
Oct 18, 2005
22,748
you see that exact sort of tackle every week in football,where a player "takes one for the team" and gets a booking to prevent a forward from running at an exposed defence. very rarely does it end in a serious injury,oh and it may also have been caused by the fact that Rangers had him play on for 5 minutes after that tackle which probably caused more problems


but you know,why let facts get in the way of a good witch hunt
 

Lorena

Senior Member
Dec 11, 2010
1,366
you see that exact sort of tackle every week in football,where a player "takes one for the team" and gets a booking to prevent a forward from running at an exposed defence. very rarely does it end in a serious injury,oh and it may also have been caused by the fact that Rangers had him play on for 5 minutes after that tackle which probably caused more problems


but you know,why let facts get in the way of a good witch hunt
It was tackle from behind with two legs and no intention of touching the ball.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 5)