++ [ originally posted by aressandro10 ] ++
this is my try of summary. i would like to apologize in advance if i have misunderstood points in the Bible's part. I woould be very happy if anyone can clear those misunderstandings or mistakes..
this is my try of summary. i would like to apologize in advance if i have misunderstood points in the Bible's part. I woould be very happy if anyone can clear those misunderstandings or mistakes..
The Bible isn't written by 4 different sources, it's different accounts of the same events. If there were 100 journalists at the one press conference, wouldn't it be more reliable because there's more sources? If you read all 100 of the transcripts, you'd be pretty dang sure of exactly what Lippi said, right? You also know it's reliable, because so many people have witnessed what happened and written the same things. Sure, some of the journalists might leave out some stuff that they don't think is that important, but if another journalist has recorded that, then doesn't that make for a more reliable account?
As for the translations, of course the Bible's translated into different languages, because there's so many languages in the world...but the actual foundation of the Bible, the original writings in Hebrew and Greek, are the same.
If you look at all the different translations of the Bible, they all have the same crux and have the same core beliefs. Sure, the Greek version might say "Then Jesus drank half a glass of water", and the English translation might say "Jesus drank 2/3 of a glass of water", but that's not what's important here. The core events and teachings remain consistent.
