Paul Pogba (80 Viewers)
- Thread starter Lo-Pan
- Start date
You couldn't even swindle a job to pay you minimum wage having that much time off for discomfort lmao
The argument is "Oh well he's super talented & you can't just easily replace somebody at that level. Supply & demand"
Except based on the last 5 years he's of flopping + never being available he's not in the top fucking 100 of midfielders. He's useless & living like a king. He's a parasite.
The argument is "Oh well he's super talented & you can't just easily replace somebody at that level. Supply & demand"
Except based on the last 5 years he's of flopping + never being available he's not in the top fucking 100 of midfielders. He's useless & living like a king. He's a parasite.
Eventually he will but obviously that's not the point. He won't contribute anyway as he'll be looking for some decent form for months from that moment on, just to have a relapse of some kind. Rinse and repeat.
We'd be better off with a cone instead of him. The management fuckers gave him #10 and THAT contract. Yikes.
He shouldn't have been hired by a top club to begin with. Then, not sure if JJ is a top club anymore.
We'd be better off with a cone instead of him. The management fuckers gave him #10 and THAT contract. Yikes.
He shouldn't have been hired by a top club to begin with. Then, not sure if JJ is a top club anymore.
NBA used to be full of men back in the day - now it's all about load management. Faggots travel first class but sometimes can't play back to back.
- - - Updated - - -
Fans should be allowed to challenge players to prove their worth.
If a fan can beat a player in a variety of drills and a one on one game, 30% of that player's salary goes towards transfers, 10% to charity, and 10% to the fan who defeated him. In case the fan loses, he should be banned from the stadium for 1 year.
- - - Updated - - -
Fans should be allowed to challenge players to prove their worth.
If a fan can beat a player in a variety of drills and a one on one game, 30% of that player's salary goes towards transfers, 10% to charity, and 10% to the fan who defeated him. In case the fan loses, he should be banned from the stadium for 1 year.
Last edited:
Yes, basketball has way higher intensity due to small court but saying it's much more physical? Nah. Maybe in the 90s but certainly not now.
Basketball has a different type of physicality which is less dangerous in terms of injuries. You do lots of boxing out, pushing and stuff like that. They literally give fouls for touching a finger when you shot the ball or you gently touch someone when they drive to the basket.
While in football, despite the lower intensity, you could literally be kicked or have your feet stepped on all game long and opposition player could even get away without a yellow.
Like, if you take a regular yellow card foul that happens in football and have an NBA player do the same on basketball court, they'll get thrown out of the arena and then have 3 game ban + 50k$ fine.
Basketball has a different type of physicality which is less dangerous in terms of injuries. You do lots of boxing out, pushing and stuff like that. They literally give fouls for touching a finger when you shot the ball or you gently touch someone when they drive to the basket.
While in football, despite the lower intensity, you could literally be kicked or have your feet stepped on all game long and opposition player could even get away without a yellow.
Like, if you take a regular yellow card foul that happens in football and have an NBA player do the same on basketball court, they'll get thrown out of the arena and then have 3 game ban + 50k$ fine.
Last edited: