Nick Against the World (58 Viewers)

[JCK]

Anyway, it seems Milan will not be in the title race. I don't know why I thought they could be competitive even with the point penalty.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Manuel]

Zulte-Waregem 4-0 Anderlecht
N. Frutos x2, M. Tchité, B. Goor

He means Zulte-Waregem 0-4 Anderlecht

Be warned Nick!

Remember Mémé Tchité? He did the Asian tour with Juve a year ago. He was still playing for Standard at the time, and has been transferred to RSC Anderlecht this summer. He already scored 7 goals in the Jupiler league.

Sadly Anderlecht's defense is pretty much in shambles and even then it wasn't very good to begin with. Too bad cause Boussoufa + Tchité + Frutos could cause some trouble, for every defense. But since they are so shaky at the back, they really can't push forward the entire time.

 

[Geof]

He means Zulte-Waregem 0-4 Anderlecht

of course I did. edited. :toast:

 

[3pac]

What happened with the game?

Kaladze, after a cross that left 4 players offsides (ok i concede they werent participating in the action, so no complaint there), traps the ball with his hand (in fairly plain view of just about everybody) and puts it in the net with his foot.

Milanisti will probably argue that a sampdoria handball within their box (about 5 min later) shouldve been a penalty, however the attacker behind him was most certainly offside.

 

[Bjerknes]

For those interested in college football, Michigan at Penn State tonight at 8. It's going to be frickin sweet, and I'm going to be there in the complete white out.

 

[sateeh]

Anyway, it seems Milan will not be in the title race. I don't know why I thought they could be competitive even with the point penalty.

same here. Though its a real shame cuz i wanted them to challenge Inter for it or at least give them a scare.
But their stupidity in the transfer market is starting to show and its showing very early.

 

[Snoop]

I am afriad they will, because we only have Inter there, and we all know what Inter is.

 

[JCK]

Actually I thought they had a good transfer campaign considering they lost 65% of their team in selling ONE player. Even though many said they need to strengthen their old defence and they ran to buy forwards, I still don't see a problem in their back. But then again, their backline is covered by a solid midfield. Ronaldinho is not an option, Henry would have been the ideal replacement to Sheva.

 

[Bjerknes]

Andy, check this out, I know you are interested

http://valuca.funtigo.com/?preview=y&g=25544746&cr=1&rfm=y

You have got to love the Kelvin-Helmholtz "wave" clouds located off the coast of Georgia. Sheer beauty.

 

[sateeh]

Actually I thought they had a good transfer campaign considering they lost 65% of their team in selling ONE player. Even though many said they need to strengthen their old defence and they ran to buy forwards, I still don't see a problem in their back. But then again, their backline is covered by a solid midfield. Ronaldinho is not an option, Henry would have been the ideal replacement to Sheva.

well tonite their problem was in the midfield.They dont have any quality cover.The likes of Ambrosini wont change a game.

 

[JCK]

I am afriad they will, because we only have Inter there, and we all know what Inter is.

Inter will win the Scudetto, they made it too easy for them. Roma are a good team but they will choke like they did against Inter. Now people will say that Roma played good and didn't choke in that game, but the score is what counts in the end.

 

[sateeh]

Inter will win the Scudetto, they made it too easy for them. Roma are a good team but they will choke like they did against Inter. Now people will say that Roma played good and didn't choke in that game, but the score is what counts in the end.

If Roma could keep up winning the "low profile" games then they will be in pole position imo. At the begining of the season i didnt think they could grind out results but they r doing that even with the long list of injured players.

 

[JCK]

If Roma could keep up winning the "low profile" games then they will be in pole position imo. At the begining of the season i didnt think they could grind out results but they r doing that even with the long list of injured players.

I am hoping Roma would upset everyone else but I can't see them with the cigar.

 

[Falafel]

I am hoping Roma would upset everyone else but I can't see them with the cigar.

same here

 

[IncuboRossonero]

you really made me chuckle. you really do fit the bill: loud empty and no direction.
where do i start? Your boy Justinian, what was his title? pontified your boy; and your common law argument are we talking code or application of precedence( the most common of senses)? As for Napoleonic it came out strictly as a reaction to christianity( the same napoleon who sacked the vatican coz he was jealous) Now to my plat de resistance: the swearing of oath? the cornerstone of legal matter you know witness, perjury blah blah

Before you want to dance with me on this issue..perhaps you should look back and search my old posts to figure out my academic background.
When we talk about Common law we DON'T TALK ABOUT CODE...the difference between COMMON LAW and CIVIL LAW is just that THE CODE.
Be it the Civil Code in Italy, France, Quebec, etc. Common law looks to case law ..Civil law looks primarily to the code.

TO THE POINT: You claimed all laws are religious based...you actually showed me the opposite: Napoleonic code came out stricly as a reaction to Christianity you say...SO OBVIOUSLY ITS NOT RELIGIOUS BASED...
Please indicate how Common Law is religious when it evolves every day as new judgements are rendered and precedents are set by the court...

oh i bet every pope(and christian for that matter) up to the 13th century would disagree with your statement there, what? even st augustine? yes even st augustine shared that view. Now please, run along with your ignorance, run along and resume your urine handling activities.

N.B: writing about condoms might get you excommunicated int:

I have no fuckin clue what you are blabbering about but I will make the point CLEAR:

YOU STATED: ALL LAWS ARE RELIGIOUS BASED.

I DEMONSTRATED; THEY ARE NOT.

YOU BASICALLY DIDN'T OFFER A REBUTTAL...

Don't judge a book by its cover kid...you assume that because I throw my mouth off I have no arguments to back up my claim...in fact this loud mouth has 6 years of training in ......








LAW

 

[Martin]

Nicky, do you do any litigation? I would like to see you and Pado go head to head. :devil:

 

[Seven]

you really made me chuckle. you really do fit the bill: loud empty and no direction.
where do i start? Your boy Justinian, what was his title? pontified your boy; and your common law argument are we talking code or application of precedence( the most common of senses)? As for Napoleonic it came out strictly as a reaction to christianity( the same napoleon who sacked the vatican coz he was jealous) Now to my plat de resistance: the swearing of oath? the cornerstone of legal matter you know witness, perjury blah blah




oh i bet every pope(and christian for that matter) up to the 13th century would disagree with your statement there, what? even st augustine? yes even st augustine shared that view. Now please, run along with your ignorance, run along and resume your urine handling activities.

N.B: writing about condoms might get you excommunicated int:

Actually I think you can add a few centuries to that .

 

[Slagathor]

Actually I think you can add a few centuries to that .

Yeah well it's a mistery to me why people pay any attention to what the pope says, it's quite obvious that any man who consciously chooses to spend a lifetime without sex is quite bonkers. So why do we lock up the crazy people if they're just crazy, and adore the crazy people who happen to wear shiny uniforms?

 

[Martin]

Erik, your religious intolerance is reaching adorable heights

 

[Slagathor]

Just returning what they've been giving me all my life