Nick Against the World (58 Viewers)

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
125,407
Politics Explained

FEUDALISM: You have two cows. Your lord takes some of the milk.

PURE SOCIALISM: You have two cows. The government takes them and puts them in a barn with everyone else's cows. You have to take care of all of the cows. The government gives you as much milk as you need.

BUREAUCRATIC SOCIALISM: You have two cows. The government takes them and put them in a barn with everyone else's cows. They are cared for by ex-chicken farmers. You have to take care of the chickens the government took from the chicken farmers. The government gives you as much milk and eggs as the regulations say you need.

FASCISM: You have two cows. The government takes both, hires you to take care of them and sells you the milk.

PURE COMMUNISM: You have two cows. Your neighbors help you take care of them, and you all share the milk.

RUSSIAN COMMUNISM: You have two cows. You have to take care of them, but the government takes all the milk.

CAMBODIAN COMMUNISM: You have two cows. The government takes both of them and shoots you.

DICTATORSHIP: You have two cows. The government takes both and drafts you.

PURE DEMOCRACY: You have two cows. Your neighbors decide who gets the milk.

REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY: You have two cows. Your neighbors pick someone to tell you who gets the milk.

BUREAUCRACY: You have two cows. At first the government regulates what you can feed them and when you can milk them. Then it pays you not to milk them. Then it takes both, shoots one, milks the other and pours the milk down the drain. Then it requires you to fill out forms accounting for the missing cows.

PURE ANARCHY: You have two cows. Either you sell the milk at a fair price or your neighbors try to take the cows and kill you.

LIBERTARIAN/ANARCHO-CAPITALISM: You have two cows. You sell one and buy a bull.

SURREALISM: You have two giraffes. The government requires you to take harmonica lessons.
 

ReBeL

The Jackal
Jan 14, 2005
22,871
Those are the best:

Jeeks said:
Politics Explained

FASCISM: You have two cows. The government takes both, hires you to take care of them and sells you the milk.

CAMBODIAN COMMUNISM: You have two cows. The government takes both of them and shoots you.

REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY: You have two cows. Your neighbors pick someone to tell you who gets the milk.

SURREALISM: You have two giraffes. The government requires you to take harmonica lessons.
:rofl:
 

Snoop

Sabet is a nasty virgin
Oct 2, 2001
28,186
Well they shouldn't, People should overcome this mentality, being agressive or sensitive because of relligion discussion is something beyond understandable. Who gives a fuck what others think or say of my (religion)/(way of life). in that particular thread, I can't believe that people still are sensitive about it, nothing is offensive there, no one is insulting anyone. People are sharing their experinces or their knowledge or their way of life with each others, yet, this ahmedz dude gets sensitive.:faq1:
 

Rami

The Linuxologist
Dec 24, 2004
8,065
Snoop said:
Well they shouldn't, People should overcome this mentality, being agressive or sensitive because of relligion discussion is something beyond understandable. Who gives a fuck what others think or say of my (religion)/(way of life). in that particular thread, I can't believe that people still are sensitive about it, nothing is offensive there, no one is insulting anyone. People are sharing their experinces or their knowledge or their way of life with each others, yet, this ahmedz dude gets sensitive
What was wrong in the first place? We weren't really talking any religion?? The only religion was about "Ahmadi" and it wasn't much of discussion but raising the issue of vandalism in wikipedia.com??:confused:
 

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
125,407
snoop said:
Well they shouldn't, People should overcome this mentality, being agressive or sensitive because of relligion discussion is something beyond understandable. Who gives a fuck what others think or say of my (religion)/(way of life). in that particular thread, I can't believe that people still are sensitive about it, nothing is offensive there, no one is insulting anyone. People are sharing their experinces or their knowledge or their way of life with each others, yet, this ahmedz dude gets sensitive.:faq1:
You maybe right, but you simply cannot change people or how tey think.
 

The Pado

Filthy Gobbo
Jul 12, 2002
9,939
Good thing the refs stopped making mistakes since Juve was sent down, as Nick pointed out. But why has Carletto complained after every match so far?

“Kaladze’s goal should’ve been disallowed, but there was also a penalty on Pippo Inzaghi in the first half that we weren’t given,” said the tactician.


“There were refereeing errors on both sides, so they even themselves out. It finished 1-1 and that’s the correct result.”
 

Manuel

Senior Member
Aug 8, 2003
693
The Pado said:
Good thing the refs stopped making mistakes since Juve was sent down, as Nick pointed out. But why has Carletto complained after every match so far?

“Kaladze’s goal should’ve been disallowed, but there was also a penalty on Pippo Inzaghi in the first half that we weren’t given,” said the tactician.


“There were refereeing errors on both sides, so they even themselves out. It finished 1-1 and that’s the correct result.”
So two wrongs do make a right?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 58)