News that makes you say WTF! (28 Viewers)

Enron

Tickle Me
Moderator
Oct 11, 2005
75,661
as i pointed out the ideals might seem benign at first sight but their application and practical interpretation are disastrous, the results of which are a generation of repressed emasculated men and the emergence of douche bags and psychos at the top of the testosterone totem pole. Not to mention the devastating effects of the ubiquity of single mothers both as a burden on society and on the children in these homes.
I'd argue that is much more a result of an entire societal evolution brought on by most people's me first tendencies. It's not just women that use their feminism to get what they want by demanding equal treatment as well as coddeling. You could also blame blacks, asians, immigrants, and white people. We're basically a society of whiney douchebags (we've always been a society of douchebags), but it's more than just feminists to blame.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

ALC

Ohaulick
Oct 28, 2010
46,529
as i pointed out the ideals might seem benign at first sight but their application and practical interpretation are disastrous, the results of which are a generation of repressed emasculated men and the emergence of douche bags and psychos at the top of the testosterone totem pole. Not to mention the devastating effects of the ubiquity of single mothers both as a burden on society and on the children in these homes.

- - - Updated - - -

oh and E, you my boy no need to apologize, i keep things in contexts, and as ugly as intellectual arm wrestling gets, it's just that: slinging of ideas
meh, can't really blame that on feminism imo. there's probably always been guys like that.
 

ZoSo

Senior Member
Jul 11, 2011
41,656
meh, can't really blame that on feminism imo. there's probably always been guys like that.
Yes, it can be blamed due to feminism being an equal rights movement, which probably affected gay rights movements. This in turn led to how much gays ('faggots' without being derogatory is probably a better word - you know the type) are 'celebrated' these days. esp on TV etc where they make it out like its normal and that's how guys should act. The way those types are portrayed in the media is wrong. And now what they wear, hairstyle etc is shown as trendy.... ~15 years ago if you dressed, had the haircut etc like a lot of people do today (that aren't gay) you'd probably have a chance to be bashed up for looking like a poofter. Males growing up don't need emasculated role models. Even young girls probably get the wrong message where its normal for males to not be dominant. It's a peversion of how we were created, males being the dominant sex, that is natural and should be accepted. It's wrong how normal it is these days that guys can just or even be forced into emasculate/ing themselves and be considered 'cool' or whatever. Not only that but less masculine men in some situations probably leads to more women with less femininity to try and get power over 'weaker' males. It all leads to a weaker society where the weaker, needy and whingers come out on top... It should be survival of the fittest.

I doubt all this exists much in countries where the weaker groups don't have more rights.

- - - Updated - - -

/long rant lol

- - - Updated - - -

Hey, at least she ain't taking a bus. :seven:
:lol2:
 

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
Apr 14, 2005
70,798
Hey, at least she ain't taking a bus. :seven:
woulda been better joke if you included "running the train" :p

- - - Updated - - -

Yes, it can be blamed due to feminism being an equal rights movement, which probably affected gay rights movements. This in turn led to how much gays ('faggots' without being derogatory is probably a better word - you know the type) are 'celebrated' these days. esp on TV etc where they make it out like its normal and that's how guys should act. The way those types are portrayed in the media is wrong. And now what they wear, hairstyle etc is shown as trendy.... ~15 years ago if you dressed, had the haircut etc like a lot of people do today (that aren't gay) you'd probably have a chance to be bashed up for looking like a poofter. Males growing up don't need emasculated role models. Even young girls probably get the wrong message where its normal for males to not be dominant. It's a peversion of how we were created, males being the dominant sex, that is natural and should be accepted. It's wrong how normal it is these days that guys can just or even be forced into emasculate/ing themselves and be considered 'cool' or whatever. Not only that but less masculine men in some situations probably leads to more women with less femininity to try and get power over 'weaker' males. It all leads to a weaker society where the weaker, needy and whingers come out on top... It should be survival of the fittest.

I doubt all this exists much in countries where the weaker groups don't have more rights.

- - - Updated - - -

/long rant lol

- - - Updated - - -



:lol2:

:tup: but prepare to be called many things
 

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
"Thomasius’s profoundly learned treatise, de Concubinatu, is well worth reading, for it shows that, among all nations, and in all ages, down to the Lutheran Reformation, concubinage was allowed, nay, that it was an institution, in a certain measure even recognised by law and associated with no dishonour." is bs? how? have you read the treatise? do you have counter arguments to the facts presented therein? or you simply trying to look civilized by reneging the whole because some of what is presented is deemed misogynistic in our societies?
Don't get me wrong, it tickles me that you're on the side of something so dubious for once. But just reading a handful of sentences of this thing is enough to see how ridiculous it is:

One need only look at a woman’s shape to discover that she is not intended for either too much mental or too much physical work. She pays the debt of life not by what she does but by what she suffers—by the pains of child-bearing, care for the child, and by subjection to man, to whom she should be a patient and cheerful companion.
In other words, I'm totally making up whatever I want.
 

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
Apr 14, 2005
70,798
i find it objective, and generally on point. physically there is no argument, as for the mental well the president of harvard already got jumped for suggesting the same. I am free and i am loving it :D maybe one day you will join.
 

Hængebøffer

Senior Member
Jun 4, 2009
25,185
Yes, it can be blamed due to feminism being an equal rights movement, which probably affected gay rights movements. This in turn led to how much gays ('faggots' without being derogatory is probably a better word - you know the type) are 'celebrated' these days. esp on TV etc where they make it out like its normal and that's how guys should act. The way those types are portrayed in the media is wrong. And now what they wear, hairstyle etc is shown as trendy.... ~15 years ago if you dressed, had the haircut etc like a lot of people do today (that aren't gay) you'd probably have a chance to be bashed up for looking like a poofter. Males growing up don't need emasculated role models. Even young girls probably get the wrong message where its normal for males to not be dominant. It's a peversion of how we were created, males being the dominant sex, that is natural and should be accepted. It's wrong how normal it is these days that guys can just or even be forced into emasculate/ing themselves and be considered 'cool' or whatever. Not only that but less masculine men in some situations probably leads to more women with less femininity to try and get power over 'weaker' males. It all leads to a weaker society where the weaker, needy and whingers come out on top... It should be survival of the fittest.

I doubt all this exists much in countries where the weaker groups don't have more rights.

- - - Updated - - -

/long rant lol

- - - Updated - - -



:lol2:
The weaker, needy and whingers adapted, so they are the fittest.
 

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
This is on par with Ray Comfort explaining how the banana is clearly designed to fit into the human hand. Why? Because it fits there.

"One need only look at..." arguments are complete nonsense.
 

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
Apr 14, 2005
70,798
This is on par with Ray Comfort explaining how the banana is clearly designed to fit into the human hand. Why? Because it fits there.

"One need only look at..." arguments are complete nonsense.
no it is not called only one of the strongest arguments ever made backed by oh just the history of humanity where everything of consequence was man made/thought/created.
 

Preet

Powerpuff G!
Sep 7, 2010
3,522
Yes, it can be blamed due to feminism being an equal rights movement, which probably affected gay rights movements. This in turn led to how much gays ('$#@!s' without being derogatory is probably a better word - you know the type) are 'celebrated' these days. esp on TV etc where they make it out like its normal and that's how guys should act. The way those types are portrayed in the media is wrong. And now what they wear, hairstyle etc is shown as trendy.... ~15 years ago if you dressed, had the haircut etc like a lot of people do today (that aren't gay) you'd probably have a chance to be bashed up for looking like a poofter. Males growing up don't need emasculated role models. Even young girls probably get the wrong message where its normal for males to not be dominant. It's a peversion of how we were created, males being the dominant sex, that is natural and should be accepted. It's wrong how normal it is these days that guys can just or even be forced into emasculate/ing themselves and be considered 'cool' or whatever. Not only that but less masculine men in some situations probably leads to more women with less femininity to try and get power over 'weaker' males. It all leads to a weaker society where the weaker, needy and whingers come out on top... It should be survival of the fittest.

I doubt all this exists much in countries where the weaker groups don't have more rights.

- - - Updated - - -

/long rant lol

- - - Updated - - -



:lol2:
i agree with this kid :tup:
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 24)