'Murica! (109 Viewers)

HelterSkelter

Senior Member
Apr 15, 2005
20,794

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,657
Specifically regarding Jill..

Is it a disagreement with her policies? Or the fact voting for her is unlikely to make a difference since she won’t win?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I’m just not a fan of her Green New deal stuff, plus she doesn’t have a chance anyway.

I won’t like any of the candidates obviously.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,657
MAGAs engage in all kinds of retarded facebook level conspiracies, bit like how youre doing right now. Perhaps take a look in the mirror.
There’s nothing wrong with pointing out the obvious. Nobody here including myself wanted this to happen. If you’re looking for a pity party perhaps go to Truth Social or something.
 

maxi

Senior Member
Aug 31, 2006
3,786
There’s nothing wrong with pointing out the obvious. Nobody here including myself wanted this to happen. If you’re looking for a pity party perhaps go to Truth Social or something.
"The election was stolen. Nothing wrong with pointing out the obvious."

There. How does that sound to you?

Point is, you're not highlighting anything obvious. Not even the FBI have a clear picture as to what the motive or intent behind this was. Yet you supposedly have all the answers already.

You're grasping at straws and engaging in all sorts of weird mental gymnastics to spin an otherwise tragic and unforeseen incident against Trump. At first I thought you were joking given that youre one of the few reasonable members on this forum, but worryingly it seems like you're not.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,657
"The election was stolen. Nothing wrong with pointing out the obvious."

There. How does that sound to you?

Point is, you're not highlighting anything obvious. Not even the FBI have a clear picture as to what the motive or intent behind this was. Yet you supposedly have all the answers already.

You're grasping at straws and engaging in all sorts of weird mental gymnastics to spin an otherwise tragic and unforeseen incident against Trump. At first I thought you were joking given that youre one of the few reasonable members on this forum, but worryingly it seems like you're not.
This seems to be very upsetting to you. I’m sorry for that. It’s upsetting to me as well.

But clearly something is wrong here, whether it be pure incompetence or something worse. We just don’t know what that is yet. I think it all should be investigated independently.

- - - Updated - - -

:lol:

https://x.com/davenewworld_2/status/1812437102568599922?s=46&t=44zFspkwtn4Oth1i9vk6Xg
 
Last edited:

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,361
it looks like the Trump shooter was just another classic American shooter, who instead of shooting up a school decided to assassinate Trump
https://x.com/MeghanKDKA/status/1812508130745716962
That's always the most likely scenario in the US.

Regardless of what it was though, I'd say it's the rhetorics of American politics that is the real problem. And those rhetorics largely seem the result of special interest groups and lobbyists hijacking the political system. Getting the US back to a healthy place is going to take quite a bit of work.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn ONEPLUS A6003 met Tapatalk
 

X Æ A-12

Senior Member
Contributor
Sep 4, 2006
88,101
The relief on muslims out there when they hear the shooter was some white native american!
This is what I was alluding to in my somewhat drunken rants last night.

The shooter was apparently outside of the active security perimeter, but the sniper details were already focused on the shooter before he supposedly fired. If the suspect was outside of the security perimeter, the sniper detail would know that, so clearly the shooter should have been ID'd as a hostile threat as soon as they saw him. But instead, they waited to fire back until after he supposedly fired. This is highly suspect.

Even the Secret Service detail looked weird, almost like low budget television series material. If you watch this event against the Reagan attempt and others, there is this weird lack of urgency, especially during the prime photo op with the Trump fist shake. My neighbor is Secret Service and he looks way more professional than these guys.

So to me, there's a lot of weird stuff going on here. Perhaps it was a real lone gunman assassination attempt, but it smells bad to me.



They will say the good guys with the gun took out the trans rights activist and we need more guns.

- - - Updated - - -



Regardless, he looks like someone who could be easily manipulated. Looks like a school shooter type.
in the press conference yesterday FBI claimed that the SS had not spotted the shooter until after he fired the first shot

- - - Updated - - -

American members here..

Thoughts on Jill Stein? Anyone planning on voting for her?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
she's about as relevant in the presidential race as De Sciglio

- - - Updated - - -

it looks like the Trump shooter was just another classic American shooter, who instead of shooting up a school decided to assassinate Trump
https://x.com/MeghanKDKA/status/1812508130745716962
not surprising, the real question is, if this is some random insane retard then how the eff was he able to get into position to do this completely undetected? Should have been far more difficult than just showing up at a shopping mall with a rifle
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,657
it looks like the Trump shooter was just another classic American shooter, who instead of shooting up a school decided to assassinate Trump
https://x.com/MeghanKDKA/status/1812508130745716962
This doesn’t prove anything btw.

- - - Updated - - -

in the press conference yesterday FBI claimed that the SS had not spotted the shooter until after he fired the first shot

- - - Updated - - -


she's about as relevant in the presidential race as De Sciglio

- - - Updated - - -


not surprising, the real question is, if this is some random insane retard then how the eff was he able to get into position to do this completely undetected? Should have been far more difficult than just showing up at a shopping mall with a rifle
Don’t ask questions. It’s anti Trump.
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,862
Came here looking rational discussion, found the same level of denial and "staged" conspiracies being spouted on X. Surprised by how much stupidity is doing the rounds. An attendee died, 2 others in critical condition, and Trump millimetres from his own death. Yeah, totally sounds like something someone would approve of, no less someone leading the polls by a considerable margin and has nothing to gain by risking everything for this unecessary 'stunt'.

Some of you are no better than the Qanon conspiracists you look down on.
Maybe I've blocked all those members here already, but I'm not thinking I'm seeing what you're seeing.

I've seen X. This ain't that.

Hell, there just aren't enough t-shirt sales pitches in the comments for that alone.

American members here..

Thoughts on Jill Stein? Anyone planning on voting for her?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm frustrated that people keep asking about her. You may as well asked me about LaVar Burton and the Reading Rainbow Party. He'd get more votes.

"The election was stolen. Nothing wrong with pointing out the obvious."

There. How does that sound to you?

Point is, you're not highlighting anything obvious. Not even the FBI have a clear picture as to what the motive or intent behind this was. Yet you supposedly have all the answers already.

You're grasping at straws and engaging in all sorts of weird mental gymnastics to spin an otherwise tragic and unforeseen incident against Trump. At first I thought you were joking given that youre one of the few reasonable members on this forum, but worryingly it seems like you're not.
Hold on. I've certainly seen talk about the motives of the shooter, and laid out my guesses the same way we predict the outcome of football matches. Which is all speculation of course.

But that's not the same as calling it a "staged" conspiracy. That's a whole other level of make-believe that I am just not seeing here.

For example, if I were to suggest the kid is likely an incel loner, (not unlikely) that says nothing about Trump or somehow twists it to spin it against Trump. I mean, are you trying to strawman this into a belief that all incels are Trump supporters? Because I don't think anyone is suggesting that.
 

icemaη

Rab's Husband - The Regista
Moderator
Aug 27, 2008
36,452
Maybe I've blocked all those members here already, but I'm not thinking I'm seeing what you're seeing.

I've seen X. This ain't that.

Hell, there just aren't enough t-shirt sales pitches in the comments for that alone.
I removed Twitter from my phone quite a while ago, so that I can get my conspiracy theories exclusively from Tuz. Have people moved on from shilling Crypto on Twitter to t-shirts now?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 11, Guests: 76)