LOL this was their daft reasoning. Apparently not turning up to the inauguration incites violence now.
Buy on AliExpress.com
'Murica! (236 Viewers)
- Thread starter Fake Melo
- Start date
- Tags afl_italia's cousins forza trump smocking gun
LOL this was their daft reasoning. Apparently not turning up to the inauguration incites violence now.
Buy on AliExpress.com
I wouldn't say so, I'd actually say it was pretty equal. Just like with the Democrats then, you have "10 second speeches" or tweets from Republicans now. The only difference is, Republicans got to do it all at once because it happened while everyone was gathered in the same room at the same time and televised, so perhaps that's where you're getting this impression from. Also we must take into account some of them, Lindsey Graham for example, actively contributed to it by continuing to spread bullshit inflammatory rhetoric. But oh, now that it has culminated into action it's "enough is enough". A bit too late there. Or better yet, how about the ones essentially denying that it happened by saying it was some sort of false flag operation?
Who is out there watching following the analysis of Chris Cuomo? He doesn't have a cult following like Fox News anchors have, it doesn't work like that. I'm not sure what specific line you were referring to, but how would one fact check an "interpretation" as you called it?
Nothing was misleading. Whether they entered the building or not, the same group that marched to the Capitol is the same group the broke in. This was planned weeks ago, this wasn't some spontaneous occurrence. It was known that this was the intention. Because of this, they deserve to be lumped in imo. Obviously not Republicans or conservatives in general, but definitely every single person that went to that rally, some a week in advance, absolutely deserve to be lumped into that group.
I don't see a point in continuing this as we are going in circles, but the differences in magnitude of these two events are clear as day. All I will say is that you don't see anymore looting or rioting regarding any sort of BLM anything after that one or two weeks, but now you watch what happens in the coming months and years in this country.
- - - Updated - - -
LOL this was their daft reasoning. Apparently not turning up to the inauguration incites violence now.
You could've at least thrown a spoiler on that 16 foot long post 
Who is out there watching following the analysis of Chris Cuomo? He doesn't have a cult following like Fox News anchors have, it doesn't work like that. I'm not sure what specific line you were referring to, but how would one fact check an "interpretation" as you called it?
Nothing was misleading. Whether they entered the building or not, the same group that marched to the Capitol is the same group the broke in. This was planned weeks ago, this wasn't some spontaneous occurrence. It was known that this was the intention. Because of this, they deserve to be lumped in imo. Obviously not Republicans or conservatives in general, but definitely every single person that went to that rally, some a week in advance, absolutely deserve to be lumped into that group.I don't see a point in continuing this as we are going in circles, but the differences in magnitude of these two events are clear as day. All I will say is that you don't see anymore looting or rioting regarding any sort of BLM anything after that one or two weeks, but now you watch what happens in the coming months and years in this country.
- - - Updated - - -
LOL this was their daft reasoning. Apparently not turning up to the inauguration incites violence now.
https://thehill.com/policy/national...mjkQU3fZo8pOtkClDPawe_k061tEcKqu3Bw_m4T_Gppf0
Surprise surprise. No evidence that Antifa involved in capitol riot and insurrection that alt right planned in the open on social media. But Fox News, Breitbart, OAN, Newsmax, and Trump’s GOP propagandists like that fuckwit Gaetz gonna double down and lie about it some more, I’m sure.
Surprise surprise. No evidence that Antifa involved in capitol riot and insurrection that alt right planned in the open on social media. But Fox News, Breitbart, OAN, Newsmax, and Trump’s GOP propagandists like that fuckwit Gaetz gonna double down and lie about it some more, I’m sure.
Well i guess we can agree to disagree. I am yet to recall several big shot democrats come out and openly criticise the riots.
I mean, he definitely contributed to the anger that stemmed from the insurrection, but at least he came out and denounced the violence. I could say the same thing with Harris when she told protestors not to back down or give up. I'd say that's inflammatory.
Plus I don't think any Republican would have supported this insurrection as it was pretty inconvenient from their standpoint. They were interrupted from raising their objections. After the whole fiasco happened, it would have been inappropriate to continue.
He wrongly presumed that peaceful protest was not in the constitution. If Hannity and Tucker can get fact-checked, then I don't see why he can't. He's not any old journalist, he's the brother of the Governor of NY and a top CNN presenter.
Again, if you and I can agree that looters and antifa don't deserve to represent the majority of BLM, then the same thing can be applied here too.
Sorry, I don't comment much so I don't know how. 
I mean, he definitely contributed to the anger that stemmed from the insurrection, but at least he came out and denounced the violence. I could say the same thing with Harris when she told protestors not to back down or give up. I'd say that's inflammatory.
Plus I don't think any Republican would have supported this insurrection as it was pretty inconvenient from their standpoint. They were interrupted from raising their objections. After the whole fiasco happened, it would have been inappropriate to continue.
He wrongly presumed that peaceful protest was not in the constitution. If Hannity and Tucker can get fact-checked, then I don't see why he can't. He's not any old journalist, he's the brother of the Governor of NY and a top CNN presenter.
Again, if you and I can agree that looters and antifa don't deserve to represent the majority of BLM, then the same thing can be applied here too.
You could've at least thrown a spoiler on that 16 foot long post
Perhaps they should. But banning alt-right platforms or any others that folks disagree with will only lead to more escalation. This very topic is partly why the alt-right is becoming more aggressive -- they don't have a right to exist on any platform, and now that Trump is basically silenced it will probably only lead to more radicalization. Plus "authorities" can easily track idiots making threats on said platforms.
Banning everything the left doesn't like will surely backfire in the long run.
- - - Updated - - -
After the violence in the cities this summer, didn't several city councils across the country claim the solution was to defund the police? That's nothing but rewarding bad behavior.
Banning everything the left doesn't like will surely backfire in the long run.
- - - Updated - - -
After the violence in the cities this summer, didn't several city councils across the country claim the solution was to defund the police? That's nothing but rewarding bad behavior.