'Murica! (98 Viewers)

[icemaη]

This sentence



Clinton wouldn't qualify as being anywhere near the left side of the political spectrum in 90% of all other developed nations on earth.

This election race is between an outsider GOP candidate and a GOP Democratic Party infiltrator. USA is voting right this time around. Just how right it will go is the mystery.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Enron]

This sentence



Clinton wouldn't qualify as being anywhere near the left side of the political spectrum in 90% of all other developed nations on earth.

She's not liberal at all. The US hasn't had a liberal candidate since the Carter administration.

Our country is so conservative even the democrats are conservative. Let that that sink in.

 

[Ronn]

Elizabeth Warren is a fraud. She talks about a hard stance to the banksters, but then never follows through with it. That's typically what happens to politicians like Warren.

She actually started CFPB as a Wall Street watchdog. Obama could not nominate her as the director because of GOP opposition
http://articles.latimes.com/2011/sep/07/business/la-fi-consumer-bureau-cordray-20110907

 

[.zero]

She's not liberal at all. The US hasn't had a liberal candidate since the Carter administration.

Our country is so conservative even the democrats are conservative. Let that that sink in.

You think you're smarter than me??

Let's wrastle

 

[Bjerknes]

Awesome. But Trump does encourage the violence. It's why people like him.

Like I said, it's always his fault...

People say I'm crazy and I know it sounds over the top, but he's very Hiterlike in the way he handles his campaign.

In some respects, yes, I can see that. From his overall charisma to what he sometimes harps on in front of crowds. But that doesn't mean he's going to gas 3 million Mexicans.

This sentence



Clinton wouldn't qualify as being anywhere near the left side of the political spectrum in 90% of all other developed nations on earth.

Hillary is more of an authoritarian than anything else. But she’s still in favor of bloated government bureaucracies and other items the Left preaches.

She's not liberal at all. The US hasn't had a liberal candidate since the Carter administration.

Our country is so conservative even the democrats are conservative. Let that that sink in.

There's nothing conservative about blowing up random countries and running up massive budget deficits for decades. We have no conservatives in Washington.

She actually started CFPB as a Wall Street watchdog. Obama could not nominate her as the director because of GOP opposition
http://articles.latimes.com/2011/sep/07/business/la-fi-consumer-bureau-cordray-20110907

And how many bankers have been indicted?

 

[Seven]

In some respects, yes, I can see that. From his overall charisma to what he sometimes harps on in front of crowds. But that doesn't mean he's going to gas 3 million Mexicans.

Well, no. But surely no one believes he would. In any case the rest of the world might as well start preparing for a Trump presidency it seems.

 

[GordoDeCentral]

Are you seriously defending Trump?

 

[Seven]

Are you seriously defending Trump?

I was expressing my doubts as to whether he'd go as far as gassing 3 million Mexicans.

 

[GordoDeCentral]

Trump supporters are funny, they claim his rhetoric on immigration and such is just that and not to be taken seriously, but swear by his nonsensical and unrealistic economic and foreign policy promises

 

[Seven]

Trump supporters are funny, they claim his rhetoric on immigration and such is just that and not to be taken seriously, but swear by his nonsensical and unrealistic economic and foreign policy promises

I take his rhetoric very seriously. And of course I believe he would be a dangerous and poorly chosen president. Over here everyone does. I just compared him to Hitler a couple posts above yours.

 

[Osman]

Trump supporters are funny, they claim his rhetoric on immigration and such is just that and not to be taken seriously, but swear by his nonsensical and unrealistic economic and foreign policy promises

02.05 onwards:

 

[Enron]

There's nothing conservative about blowing up random countries and running up massive budget deficits for decades. We have no conservatives in Washington.

You sure about that? Interventionist foreign policy, huge deficits, etc all seem to be very conservative tenants. Just ask the people of Kansas and Louisiana.

- - - Updated - - -

Trump supporters are funny, they claim his rhetoric on immigration and such is just that and not to be taken seriously, but swear by his nonsensical and unrealistic economic and foreign policy promises

I don't see how someone that tried to sell meat through the sharper image could be good for the economy.

 

[Ronn]

And how many bankers have been indicted?

I have to laugh. So the one who's actually trying is a fraud, and the other 534 senators and congressmen are not?

http://www.warren.senate.gov/files/documents/Rigged_Justice_2016.pdf

 

[Seven]

You sure about that? Interventionist foreign policy, huge deficits, etc all seem to be very conservative tenants. Just ask the people of Kansas and Louisiana.

If you'd ask a European what he thinks a conservative US politician wants to do it would be exactly that tbh. Not saying that it's true, but that's the sentiment here.

 

[swag]

You often get the government you deserve. Ouch.

You sure about that? Interventionist foreign policy, huge deficits, etc all seem to be very conservative tenants. Just ask the people of Kansas and Louisiana.

Reagan tripled the national deficit. And I thought the bleeding heart "no war, make peace" stereotype was supposed to be liberals, not conservatives.

Problem is that either label is a coalition of convenience. Which makes it laughable that the Tea Party folks seem clueless that the choices are either compromise or dictatorship.

If you'd ask a European what he thinks a conservative US politician wants to do it would be exactly that tbh. Not saying that it's true, but that's the sentiment here.

Bernie Sanders is just known as a typical Canadian politician up north.

 

[Ronn]

You often get the government you deserve. Ouch.



Reagan tripled the national deficit. And I thought the bleeding heart "no war, make peace" stereotype was supposed to be liberals, not conservatives.

Problem is that either label is a coalition of convenience. Which makes it laughable that the Tea Party folks seem clueless that the choices are either compromise or dictatorship.



Bernie Sanders is just known as a typical Canadian politician up north.

Reagan tripled the debt, and doubled the deficit.

 

[Bjerknes]

Are you seriously defending Trump?

In this instance, yes. In others, not so much. But a lot of what is said about Trump is simple fear mongering.

You sure about that? Interventionist foreign policy, huge deficits, etc all seem to be very conservative tenants. Just ask the people of Kansas and Louisiana.

Some Republicans might think that, but it's really not. Just another reason why we need a third party for Libertarians.

I have to laugh. So the one who's actually trying is a fraud, and the other 534 senators and congressmen are not?

http://www.warren.senate.gov/files/documents/Rigged_Justice_2016.pdf

I don't think all of them claim to be against Wall Street. But yes, many of them are certainly frauds as well.

Reagan tripled the national deficit. And I thought the bleeding heart "no war, make peace" stereotype was supposed to be liberals, not conservatives.

Problem is that either label is a coalition of convenience. Which makes it laughable that the Tea Party folks seem clueless that the choices are either compromise or dictatorship.

That's the issue. We need to cut certain areas of government spending, but neither party wants to follow through with it. Of course eliminating some programs would be unpopular for certain segments of the population, but it needs to be done. Of course, this will never happen and we'll blow up our economy first, but it just goes to show how both parties are complete garbage. We really have no choice at all.

 

[GordoDeCentral]

In this instance, yes. In others, not so much. But a lot of what is said about Trump is simple fear mongering.



Some Republicans might think that, but it's really not. Just another reason why we need a third party for Libertarians.



I don't think all of them claim to be against Wall Street. But yes, many of them are certainly frauds as well.



That's the issue. We need to cut certain areas of government spending, but neither party wants to follow through with it. Of course eliminating some programs would be unpopular for certain segments of the population, but it needs to be done. Of course, this will never happen and we'll blow up our economy first, but it just goes to show how both parties are complete garbage. We really have no choice at all.

He's a buffoon, antithesis to anything intellectual, he might as well postulate for the price is right

 

[Bjerknes]

He's a buffoon, antithesis to anything intellectual, he might as well postulate for the price is right

Depends on what sort of intellectual we need. Obama is considered an intellectual and he's a disaster. Trump can easily attract buffoons, but some of the stuff he "says" are at least on the right track. Of course, that doesn't mean much.

 

[swag]

In this instance, yes. In others, not so much. But a lot of what is said about Trump is simple fear mongering.



Some Republicans might think that, but it's really not. Just another reason why we need a third party for Libertarians.



I don't think all of them claim to be against Wall Street. But yes, many of them are certainly frauds as well.



That's the issue. We need to cut certain areas of government spending, but neither party wants to follow through with it. Of course eliminating some programs would be unpopular for certain segments of the population, but it needs to be done. Of course, this will never happen and we'll blow up our economy first, but it just goes to show how both parties are complete garbage. We really have no choice at all.

There needs to be an art to killing bureaucracies when they no longer serve public purposes.