'Murica! (174 Viewers)

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
Well, it's true. There's always going to be something going on in the world that apparently demands the use of U.S military force. Obama killed as many as 1000 innocent civilians with drone strikes alone and still he was called soft in Washington for not being trigger happy enough. Unfortunately, when it comes to matters of state security, being too passive is politically unwise.
The US has been at war pretty much constantly since WW2, hasn't it?
Well, has Australia? What makes this unavoidable, exactly?

They wage war only because they have an agenda.
 

Ocelot

Midnight Marauder
Jul 13, 2013
18,943
I'm not really talking about eligibility for the presidency. I'm just saying, whoever does get it, by the end of their first term, will be implicit in the death of innocent civilians. Is that so scandalous to say? I would have thought it pretty obvious.
I agree with that. Although I wouldn't call those deaths "unavoidable".

What I still don't agree with is "just give Trump a chance" :p

- - - Updated - - -

The US has been at war pretty much constantly since WW2, hasn't it?
Well, has Australia? What makes this unavoidable, exactly?

They wage war only because they have an agenda.
You could argue that at times those innocent deaths are "necessary" because they prevent even more innocent people dying.

Of course that doesn't really apply to the vast majority of the people killed by the US since WW II.
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,703
Ahhhm...shall I remind you that you've lived in a country where frigging Obama was compared to Hitler on a weekly basis? :D
Then that makes the people here comparing Trump to Hitler absolutely no different than the nut jobs that did the same to Obama: The teabaggers :tup:

- - - Updated - - -

I'm trying to say that Trump, if elected, would have no qualms with getting blood on his hands. But every U.S President since Roosevelt got their hands dirty in one way or another anyway. Killing innocent people is an unavoidable part of the job.
It would be a hell of a lot more avoidable if we stayed the hell home and out of other people's shit.
 

Hist

Founder of Hism
Jan 18, 2009
11,614
Is Trump wanting to build a wall really such a big deal? I don't see the huge problem.

I am not well versed in US politics but it seems like there is an issue with illegal immigration, why is making it harder for people to enter the country illegally a racist action?

It doesn't seem all that different to Hungary/Macedonia having to put up fences to help stem the flow of migrants in recent months or the UK doing border checks when people arrive from France.

I'm genuinely not trying to stir an issue but I just don't see why so much is made of this and why it is considered racist.
While there is nothing wrong with wanting all the immigration coming in the country to be legal, sometimes it is just not worth it financially speaking. The wall will cost buckets of money and if the US government decides to take the same number of unskilled migrants through the legal channels (Work Visas etc..) then that will require a huge expansion of the immigration office and will cost more buckets of money. Add to that that legal migrants have more rights than illegal ones and would cost the government more in terms of benefits and what not.

Illegal immigration into the US barely has an effect on crimes and security etc.. and the labor is needed in the country, so its really not worth building a super expensive wall and processing thousands more immigration applications. Turning a blind eye has been working well with no real security threat at all. At the very most, US government could fund the policing more and keep crime levels to normal levels which would again be a lot cheaper than building the wall and processing thousands of applications.
Now if there was evidence of a substantial security threat from the Mexicans that come in (something serious like terrorism), then perhaps a wall would make sense but since that is not the case then turning a blind eye is substantially cheaper and more efficient.

You won't see that argument made often in the media because the democrat media made into a racism issue and not an economic one even though the latter is a much stronger argument imo. Illegal immigration is fueling racism though because the one's that get most hit by it are the poorest of the Americans who are unskilled, uneducated and so on. They are the ones who look to be employed as Gardeners, garbage men, delivery boys, cleaning and such unskilled servicing jobs that the illegal immigrants now compete with them for. You can pay an illegal migrant below minimum wage and get the job done but you wont be able to do so with a citizen. Trump and his ilk appeal to the people who get competition from illegals for jobs and thats why for Trump it politically makes sense to flex the wallet for the wall even if it will be a huge waste of money.

- - - Updated - - -

People compare him to Hitler because he appeals to the masses with a xenophobic discourse. You acknowledge this yourself. No one says he's Hitler's reincarnation.
Its not half as Xenophobic as Hitler's rhetoric man. There are plenty of presidents today that are infinitely worse and even they are not as Xenophobic as Hitler. The comparison to Israel's wall (I dont remember who made it) is also hilarious and really undermines what Israel are doing in the Westbank. The guy wants to keep out illegal immigration from Mexico because he wants to appeal to those who compete with illegals for jobs. The racist touch gives it a wider appeal amongst racists but he won't stop work visas altogether for instance. He is not even the only Republican promising border controls. This is hardly Hitler's stance towards the Jews, the gypsies, the handicapped, the homosexuals etc... I wouldn't even say that the Islamists in Egypt are as Xenophobic as Hitler. Even they wouldn't go that far.

The fear of trump is really over rated. He doesn't even have a party backing him up. Right and Left wing media are against him. Atleast Bernie has support in the Media and from within his party (less than Hilary ofcourse). Both won't be able to do much as presidents.
 

Enron

Tickle Me
Moderator
Oct 11, 2005
75,661
icemaη;5213668 said:
Rubio getting decimated. All the money in the world can't save him now.
Reduced by a factor of 10? Pretty sure he got passed around like a bag of candy.

- - - Updated - - -

It's quite interesting the number of people here in Mexico who are following the election.
 

Ocelot

Midnight Marauder
Jul 13, 2013
18,943
Reduced by a factor of 10? Pretty sure he got passed around like a bag of candy.

- - - Updated - - -

It's quite interesting the number of people here in Mexico who are following the election.
You have no idea how closely your election is followed by a lot of people & media outlets around the world :D

It makes sense though, for one, the outcome is really important for the whole world, most media & culture is very much americanised, and it's hugely entertaining.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 4, Guests: 142)