Mirko Vučinić (24 Viewers)

Jul 20, 2012
20,044
But me on the other hand would accept a good offer that comes for Mirko. Just like I would easily accept an offer for Marchisio because he's not good enough.

Or it's you who rates Italian players and underrates Balkan players. That makes no sense, because I don't rate all Balkan player, nor I dislike all Italian players. I'm not one of those who were saying that Nocerino, Montolivo, Gilardino, Pazzini and others were great players simply because they are $#@!, not because I underrate them.

- - - Updated - - -



We could replace Marchisio. We couldn't really replace Mirko.

That's the difference.

IS this a joke? We've already replaced Vucinic

Next seasons starting 11 will be comprised of Tevez and Llorente with Vucinic staying on the bench unless he is sold
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
53,902
IS this a joke? We've already replaced Vucinic
He's obviously saying that Mirko was crucial and couldn't be replaced last season. We had player(s) who could replace Marchisio in the line-up and do just as fine. But none of the attackers was offering as much as Vucinic.

Right now it's another story because we have an even better attacker than Vucinic. For a solid offer, we could sell now.
 
May 22, 2007
37,256
He isn't too good for the bench but it matters whether he'd be happy knowing he's not considered the same sort of player to Juve now.

There are players that can struggle if they don't play quite often, and others like Solskjær are good for it.
 

Hydde

Minimiliano Tristelli
Mar 6, 2003
38,985
Hee could be the perfect replacement for Tevez. Both add something in their own way, and obvoiusly Tevez is better but Mirko is not bad...sadly he is unreliable day in day out
 

Klin

نحن الروبوتات
May 27, 2009
61,692
He isn't too good for the bench but it matters whether he'd be happy knowing he's not considered the same sort of player to Juve now.

There are players that can struggle if they don't play quite often, and others like Solskjær are good for it.
This.
 

Lion

King of Tuz
Jan 24, 2007
36,185
nah.

i feel that after the transformation that bonucci underwent. giovinco could do the same with conte.

with vucinic i feel we have reached the limit of his potential. and more clubs will pay money for him than giovinco anyway since he played more.

plus juventus needs to keep it's italian image
 

enzo

Senior Member
May 14, 2012
2,976
would rather keep giovinco.
I think of Giovinco leaving is out of question. Conte likes him and he is completely different compared to Llorente and Tevez. We would have fewer options without Giovinco being the quick, agile player he is.
 

MikeM

Footballing Hipster celebrating 4th place with Tuz
Sep 21, 2008
12,829
Vucinic is a highly skilled and creative player. Those players can't flourish with dunces like Giovinco running around with their heads cut off. I always remember people crying when he is holding the ball from 3 defenders for 10-15 seconds and finally loses it. Well, it's not like he wants to hold the ball that long. Fact is he has to because his options were usually Giovinco, Lichtsteiner or Asamoah, none of which are actual forwards and have no idea where to move.

If you think Vucinic was good last year then he has the potential to be better this year with Tevez and Llorente. He could easily partner both could he not? That is valuable to me.

Saying that, I would still sell for 15M+ but nothing less. We could sell Quagliarella for 9M and I wouldn't be surprised.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 24)