Milan are still better. (15 Viewers)
- Thread starter walu_ex
- Start date
I heard a referee saying that as Rui Costa was in just ahead of buffon in front of him and what's the word in english, and disrupted him and the whole situation and the outcome, then the referee of the match was right to cancel it.
It was up to him and whether he canceled it or not he would be right. As i said i heard this from a referee of Uefa that teaches in cyprus.
It was up to him and whether he canceled it or not he would be right. As i said i heard this from a referee of Uefa that teaches in cyprus.
I decided to stop arguing about this because i'm getting furious.
walu_ex, almost all of your points, are meaningless. or because they'r contrasting other points
or because they'r false (Milan have more character etc.) or because they'r very little things that have no meaning.
to sum everything up:
Juve is STILL better than Milan. we were always better than them and we will always be better than them.
they use a CL trophy to prove that we are wrong. but they'r forgettting that they won US in the final (with penalty kicks), and they elminated Inter with so much luck. but those teams are also participating in the Serie A, and they sucked big time there. HAHAHA!!!!
walu_ex, almost all of your points, are meaningless. or because they'r contrasting other points
or because they'r false (Milan have more character etc.) or because they'r very little things that have no meaning.to sum everything up:
Juve is STILL better than Milan. we were always better than them and we will always be better than them.
they use a CL trophy to prove that we are wrong. but they'r forgettting that they won US in the final (with penalty kicks), and they elminated Inter with so much luck. but those teams are also participating in the Serie A, and they sucked big time there. HAHAHA!!!!
So what if we hit you on the counter attack??? That doesnt mean you were the better team, nor does it mean we play like the smaller club. It's all down to tactics, Valencia got to the CL FInal two years in a row playing nothing but counterattacks.
Now, about your attacking potential (post 240, the one you didnt answer to)
To yuote myself"
"And I think Milans attack is overestimated, not underestimated. They won 4 of their 2nd Group Stage games in CL by 1-0, including 2 games against Lokomotiv, in one of which you only scored from the penalty spot.
Milan suffers of the Ancelotti syndrome, something Juve too had when Ancelotti was in charge. His teams tend to start the season briliantlly, but somwhere at the middle of the season they start to run out of steam, playing worse and worse. The same thing happent to Juve when we lost the Scudetto to Lazio a few seasons ago."
Now, about your attacking potential (post 240, the one you didnt answer to)
To yuote myself"
"And I think Milans attack is overestimated, not underestimated. They won 4 of their 2nd Group Stage games in CL by 1-0, including 2 games against Lokomotiv, in one of which you only scored from the penalty spot.
Milan suffers of the Ancelotti syndrome, something Juve too had when Ancelotti was in charge. His teams tend to start the season briliantlly, but somwhere at the middle of the season they start to run out of steam, playing worse and worse. The same thing happent to Juve when we lost the Scudetto to Lazio a few seasons ago."
Hmmmm... So if u said that we seam like the samller club, So if u r the bigger club, then what's up with u guys by actually letting us in on the break and scoring both goals? U should hv done better than that for such a big club.
Oh and Walu or walrus or whatever it is, have you ever heard about orportunity ?
Oh and Walu or walrus or whatever it is, have you ever heard about orportunity ?
There was nothing wrong with Lippi in Inter. No coach would have had better sucess, like Cuper proved. Inter are just a plaground full of spoiled brats. And counterattacking is not at all cowardly. You have to adjust to the players you have.
Or do you think it would be smarter for a team with a waterproof defence, fast wingers, and only one good attacker to play keeping possesion and attacking all game (I'm just beig hypotetical, I'm not talking about Juve). No tactic is cowardly. It's alla bout adjusting it to your players, and there's nothing wrong if a team plays 5-4-1 if they have the players to fit it.
Or do you think it would be smarter for a team with a waterproof defence, fast wingers, and only one good attacker to play keeping possesion and attacking all game (I'm just beig hypotetical, I'm not talking about Juve). No tactic is cowardly. It's alla bout adjusting it to your players, and there's nothing wrong if a team plays 5-4-1 if they have the players to fit it.
