I will never understand why Turkish government was ever against an independent Kurdish state (outside of Turkey obviously). It would literally solve all their Kurdish-related problems for good, no?
I will never understand why Turkish government was ever against an independent Kurdish state (outside of Turkey obviously). It would literally solve all their Kurdish-related problems for good, no?
Yeah instead of nipping it at the bud let's wait for them to hunker down, build their defenses up and then wait some more for them to get support for their brethren across the border to make trouble a la Kosovo
Yeah instead of nipping it at the bud let's wait for them to hunker down, build their defenses up and then wait some more for them to get support for their brethren across the border to make trouble a la Kosovo
I think differently, Kurds would calm down if they had their own country; also in the case you described Turkey would actually have international law on its side if the Kurds in Turkey tried to pull shit.
I will never understand why Turkish government was ever against an independent Kurdish state (outside of Turkey obviously). It would literally solve all their Kurdish-related problems for good, no?
I think differently, Kurds would calm down if they had their own country; also in the case you described Turkey would actually have international law on its side if the Kurds in Turkey tried to pull shit.
Tried? They have been pulling shit for over 40 years, you thinking people calm down instead of being greedy or that international law means anything beyond green light from the white house is pretty naive
Yeah instead of nipping it at the bud let's wait for them to hunker down, build their defenses up and then wait some more for them to get support for their brethren across the border to make trouble a la Kosovo
Why are the Chinese and Turks bad? Bad compared to whom?
For all intends and purposes I would never voluntarily agree with @GordoDeCentral , but he is absolutely spot on regarding Kosovo. The only small problem(hypocrisy) would be Turkey's position regarding Kosovo and future Kurdistan/Country of Kurds.
Why are the Chinese and Turks bad? Bad compared to whom?
For all intends and purposes I would never voluntarily agree with @GordoDeCentral , but he is absolutely spot on regarding Kosovo. The only small problem(hypocrisy) would be Turkey's position regarding Kosovo and future Kurdistan/Country of Kurds.
Pro-government stances are best known for being 'exceptional' in the USofA. After all even in Chinese a 'Patriot' doesn't mean someone dying in a place which most of his countryman could not find on a map if their lives depended on it, not to mention for reasons completely unknown, yet grandiosely stupid: 'democracy, freedom, good and God...'. Its also a name of a missile system...
Kosovo is both a trojan horse and Roma-nization all-in-one. It's like acid to what most westerners perceive as a 'normal' society based on some semblance of standards.
Pro-government stances are best known for being 'exceptional' in the USofA. After all even in Chinese a 'Patriot' doesn't mean someone dying in a place which most of his countryman could not find on a map if their lives depended on it, not to mention for reasons completely unknown, yet grandiosely stupid: 'democracy, freedom, good and God...'. Its also a name of a missile system...
Kosovo is both a trojan horse and Roma-nization all-in-one. It's like acid to what most westerners perceive as a 'normal' society based on some semblance of standards.
Nuance is an illusion. One is able or one isn't. A society that wants to dominate doesn't want it (being able). In a world where one such society exists (and actively tries to dominate) others aren't able to afford it even if they wanted to. That's as much as admitted openly by the USofA 'deep state' with the term 'hybrid war'.
If you meant that an opinion can be shared as long as its effects are either non-existent or concurring with the official narrative. Well - that's 'approved' EVERYWHERE. We 'love' diversity and opposition, especially when its infertile.
Nuance is an illusion. One is able or one isn't. A society that wants to dominate doesn't want it (being able). In a world where one such society exists (and actively tries to dominate) others aren't able to afford it even if they wanted to. That's as much as admitted openly by the USofA 'deep state' with the term 'hybrid war'.
If you meant that an opinion can be shared as long as its effects are either non-existent or concurring with the official narrative. Well - that's 'approved' EVERYWHERE. We 'love' diversity and opposition, especially when its infertile.