Yes. But even if it wrong conclusion/outcome, its best if people as MUCH AS POSSIBLE goad, pressure, poke, provoke, annoy, question, and antagonize eachother and accuse eachother. Most importantly force eachother to explain their thoughts. I briefly tried, but when others dont find it suspicious that someone doesnt, and accept votes with no reasoning, then it becomes hard to find something to work with. So you tend to over think and get overly paranoid on the little posts available to you that try to explain their thought process. Something Gs hate for sure, but more experienced players can handle, and it was pretty much just Ocelot doing that consistently out of the Gs. Fr3sh tried initially, then he fell back on the melodramatic and outraged/insulted routine

While Kate and Sheik coasted by in the peripherals as much as possible, gently making their presence known (until today, sheik outed himself early), but not saying much.
Now if you had hoard of civilians, who question/stand up for themselves, like Fred or Kyle did, and tomice was doing, then it becomes easier to spot them eventually (process of elimination). But more Cs like Zach in this game, quiet and completely unwilling to work with other Cs, and it becomes a very tough task to go anywhere without repeating the same mistakes in the game as an overall team.