Mafia: Chaos in the Kingdom of Tuz (6 Viewers)

Post Ironic

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2013
42,253
It was just one error after the next, and then to top it all off Soren falls asleep without putting protection on himself as the BG

For future games, the BG should be automatically protected unless he chooses to put it on someone else. Clearly, the BG is always wanting to be protected when he's not using it for someone else. He shouldn't have to tell the narrator this each day. Only days where he decides to protect someone else.
 

Enron

Tickle Me
Moderator
Oct 11, 2005
75,662
It was just one error after the next, and then to top it all off Soren falls asleep without putting protection on himself as the BG

For future games, the BG should be automatically protected unless he chooses to put it on someone else. Clearly, the BG is always wanting to be protected when he's not using it for someone else. He shouldn't have to tell the narrator this each day. Only days where he decides to protect someone else.
:agree: We should definitely adopt that rule. Why wouldn't the BG want to protect himself if he's not protecting another?
 
OP
Ragazza

Ragazza

Calciopoli Director
Jul 22, 2013
5,060
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #2,853
    It was just one error after the next, and then to top it all off Soren falls asleep without putting protection on himself as the BG

    For future games, the BG should be automatically protected unless he chooses to put it on someone else. Clearly, the BG is always wanting to be protected when he's not using it for someone else. He shouldn't have to tell the narrator this each day. Only days where he decides to protect someone else.
    That sounds like a good idea. Though maybe put a disclaimer if the BG doesn't participate and vote that day that their self-protection won't work. They shouldn't be protected if they're completely inactive that day.
     

    Post Ironic

    Senior Member
    Feb 9, 2013
    42,253
    That sounds like a good idea. Though maybe put a disclaimer if the BG doesn't participate and vote that day that their self-protection won't work. They shouldn't be protected if they're completely inactive that day.
    Certainly agree with that. If they don't participate and vote, auto-lynch.

    It ruins the game when people join who clearly don't have time to play. I mean, stopping by for a few minutes, posting a half-dozen times, and casting a vote. It's not hard.

    This game is directly through my work day. And I don't work on a computer. I'm in a shop building timberframe homes, posting on my phone as often as I can, while still being productive at work. It's not that hard to just give a few minutes.
     

    Enron

    Tickle Me
    Moderator
    Oct 11, 2005
    75,662
    Certainly agree with that. If they don't participate and vote, auto-lynch.

    It ruins the game when people join who clearly don't have time to play. I mean, stopping by for a few minutes, posting a half-dozen times, and casting a vote. It's not hard.

    This game is directly through my work day. And I don't work on a computer. I'm in a shop building timberframe homes, posting on my phone as often as I can, while still being productive at work. It's not that hard to just give a few minutes.
    I've writing about carbon sequestration ability of agave plants and working on map making course. :agree:
     
    OP
    Ragazza

    Ragazza

    Calciopoli Director
    Jul 22, 2013
    5,060
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #2,856
    Certainly agree with that. If they don't participate and vote, auto-lynch.

    It ruins the game when people join who clearly don't have time to play. I mean, stopping by for a few minutes, posting a half-dozen times, and casting a vote. It's not hard.

    This game is directly through my work day. And I don't work on a computer. I'm in a shop building timberframe homes, posting on my phone as often as I can, while still being productive at work. It's not that hard to just give a few minutes.
    Maybe going back to the one day inactive rule for autolynching would be good then. I thought it would be helpful giving a lifeline to people who might run into an emergency but still really want to play, but at the same time it's still annoying to the rest of the players.

    Like I honestly don't know if I'd be a good player at this, because my job would make it hard to be active 3-4 days a week (I can only get on my phone on my breaks, not enough time to thoroughly read and analyze everything). At least as narrator it's a pretty passive role other than popping up once in a while to post updates.
     

    Hængebøffer

    Senior Member
    Jun 4, 2009
    25,185
    Certainly agree with that. If they don't participate and vote, auto-lynch.

    It ruins the game when people join who clearly don't have time to play. I mean, stopping by for a few minutes, posting a half-dozen times, and casting a vote. It's not hard.

    This game is directly through my work day. And I don't work on a computer. I'm in a shop building timberframe homes, posting on my phone as often as I can, while still being productive at work. It's not that hard to just give a few minutes.
    I've writing about carbon sequestration ability of agave plants and working on map making course. :agree:
    Fack off. I had one day where I was inactive, which I already warned people about. That I forgot about a meeting today was just a mistake. I did post and vote today, though and it's like Aaron has been posting much. You can't sit and post during a work day, if your job involves taking care of other people.
     

    Enron

    Tickle Me
    Moderator
    Oct 11, 2005
    75,662
    Fack off. I had one day where I was inactive, which I already warned people about. That I forgot about a meeting today was just a mistake. I did post and vote today, though and it's like Aaron has been posting much. You can't sit and post during a work day, if you job involves taking care of other people.
    That's true. I had a had a bunch of meetings yesterday. I was at my desk most of the day today, so I could post more. :agree:
     

    Post Ironic

    Senior Member
    Feb 9, 2013
    42,253
    Fack off. I had one day where I was inactive, which I already warned people about. That I forgot about a meeting today was just a mistake. I did post and vote today, though and it's like Aaron has been posting much. You can't sit and post during a work day, if you job involves taking care of other people.
    I don't think there's any problem with not being super inactive for most of the day if you're busy. 5 posts and a vote isn't too big a deal. It doesn't take long at all.

    - - - Updated - - -

    active***

    - - - Updated - - -

    I've writing about carbon sequestration ability of agave plants and working on map making course. :agree:
    That actually sounds really interesting. Cool job.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 6)