Kaio Jorge - ST - Santos (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fellas

Farsopoli
Jun 13, 2005
3,136
You mean Bertolucci, his agent, we are paying tribute to him, he was the reason Milan didn't got him...
As it is well known, we are the agents... waitress!

- - - Updated - - -


again you are wrong and its pathetic that you do it from personal empathy...
we did pay those 6mil after all, we always pay more than the rest and accept more insulting terms. Also be sure that we paid much more in bitcoins, to his agent, these are just the official bits for what his agent has promised to Santos.
We regularly pay tribute to such agents without immediate benefits or logic, some of them may randomly pay off, but they do not cover our current needs.
For example, replacing Ramsey, Frabotta, Demiral, add some wingback depth etc

This kid is not prolific enough to replace CR7 or Morata, neither creative enough to replace Dybala, Chiesa or Kulu.
He is a sub that might reach his potential and might be useful after a possible future sale.
And this comes at the expense of current and actual needs.
What exactly are you defending here??
It's that your conlusion after watching him on youtube?. He is 19 years old, he can improve alot. Im not saying he will become WC, who knows? Nedved first great season was when he was 23 at Sparta Prag. Let's see what happens, from a economic point, it's not a bad deal, if he fails im sure we can make a plusvalenza on him.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Fr3sh

Senior Member
Jul 12, 2011
37,247
We low balling to get Locatelli of all people. We had the chance to get maybe 2 world class mids instead we got Ronaldo. We’re too broke now bro. Let’s hope this kid can do some good and show he deserves to be called Kaiolé.
Bro we lowball everything, I truly think it's a miracle we got and retained CR7 da GOAT(after quags)

- - - Updated - - -

i no calma only cl trophy and top midfield make me calma i need the vidal
 

DanielSz

Senior Member
Sep 6, 2014
14,343
We low balling to get Locatelli of all people. We had the chance to get maybe 2 world class mids instead we got Ronaldo. We’re too broke now bro. Let’s hope this kid can do some good and show he deserves to be called Kaiolé.
we’re lowballing sassuolo because Locatelli is pushing for Juve, and only juve. That’s just smart business. We’ll see what kind of compromise they come to, but I don’t fault them for using a players will to their advantage. It’s easy to criticize when it isn’t your money.
 

CrimsonianKing

Count Mbangula
Jan 16, 2013
27,308
we’re lowballing sassuolo because Locatelli is pushing for Juve, and only juve. That’s just smart business. We’ll see what kind of compromise they come to, but I don’t fault them for using a players will to their advantage. It’s easy to criticize when it isn’t your money.
Tbh I prefer us working this way than throwing money around Parasite style
 

Marc

Softcore Juventino
Jul 14, 2006
21,649
In 3 months he will be out of contract, but we paid:
-3mil to get him now,
- plus 1mil if he has the promised appearances, (Max is really good at that),
-plus 1mil if we qualify for the CL (since we did under Pirlo, its impossible if we dont this year),
-plus 5% cut to them from a future sale
and
- also they have the right to refuse us a loan, which is precisely what we do with those children-talents.
They should really try very very hard to achieve a worse deal than that.
That kid better replace CR7!
LOL WTF?!

Poslano sa mog SM-J530F koristeći Tapatalk
 

Marc

Softcore Juventino
Jul 14, 2006
21,649
You mean Bertolucci, his agent, we are paying tribute to him, he was the reason Milan didn't got him...
As it is well known, we are the agents... waitress!

- - - Updated - - -


again you are wrong and its pathetic that you do it from personal empathy...
we did pay those 6mil after all, we always pay more than the rest and accept more insulting terms. Also be sure that we paid much more in bitcoins, to his agent, these are just the official bits for what his agent has promised to Santos.
We regularly pay tribute to such agents without immediate benefits or logic, some of them may randomly pay off, but they do not cover our current needs.
For example, replacing Ramsey, Frabotta, Demiral, add some wingback depth etc

This kid is not prolific enough to replace CR7 or Morata, neither creative enough to replace Dybala, Chiesa or Kulu.
He is a sub that might reach his potential and might be useful after a possible future sale.
And this comes at the expense of current and actual needs.
What exactly are you defending here??
I think I will die out of laughter.

Poslano sa mog SM-J530F koristeći Tapatalk
 

rainhard

Senior Member
May 5, 2004
4,365
In 3 months he will be out of contract, but we paid:
-3mil to get him now,
- plus 1mil if he has the promised appearances, (Max is really good at that),
-plus 1mil if we qualify for the CL (since we did under Pirlo, its impossible if we dont this year),
-plus 5% cut to them from a future sale
and
- also they have the right to refuse us a loan, which is precisely what we do with those children-talents.
They should really try very very hard to achieve a worse deal than that.
That kid better replace CR7!
You will agree that this is a shake hand fee to Santos, so if they have someone else come from their ranks we still have say and not put in their blacklist
As easy as that

If he can at least reach half of Lautaro Martinez level for us, then I will categorically this is a steal as that will be 40m value
That is around 4 times what we spend on him (3m transfer + 6m agents and sign on fee)
 
Last edited:

DAiDEViL

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2015
64,587
It'd be rather strange to call someone who scored a sum total of 29 goals in his last 7 seasons a GOAT. That's 4.14 goals per season, Amauri level numbers. Poor fucker didn't even get to 100 Serie A goals. Never even played a competitive game for Italy. :(
I'm out of words here. Throwing shade at a Legend of the game with your blatant lies.
 

Strickland

Senior Member
May 17, 2019
5,859
I'm out of words here. Throwing shade at a Legend of the game with your blatant lies.
The way I see it, Italian attackers I saw in Serie A (for sure have missed tons of them)

Tier 1: Del Piero, Totti, Inzaghi
Tier 2: Quags, di Natale, Gilardino, Toni
Tier 3: Immobile, di Vaio, Miccoli, Montella, Cassano, Pazzini
Tier 5: Borriello, Matri, Brocchi, Pellissier, Lucarelli and bunch of others
 
Last edited:

Marc

Softcore Juventino
Jul 14, 2006
21,649
It'd be rather strange to call someone who scored a sum total of 29 goals in his last 7 seasons a GOAT. That's 4.14 goals per season, Amauri level numbers. Poor fucker didn't even get to 100 Serie A goals. Never even played a competitive game for Italy. :(
That is rather correct, Sir. :hi:

- - - Updated - - -

The way I see it, Italian attackers I saw in Serie A (for sure have missed tons of them)

Tier 1: Del Piero, Totti, Inzaghi
Tier 2: Quags, di Natale, Gilardino, Toni
Tier 3: Immobile, di Vaio, Miccoli, Montella, Cassano, Pazzini
Tier 5: Borriello, Matri, Brocchi, Pellissier, Lucarelli and bunch of others
Toni should be lower. Quags also. Immobile higher. Di Vaio also. Montella was awesome. Cassano unfulfilled talent so yeah, I agree. Brocchi was a MF though :p .You mean Rocchi?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)