Kaio Jorge - ST - Santos (2 Viewers)
- Thread starter Mark
- Start date
- Status
does that qualify him as full lolzilian?
In 3 months he will be out of contract, but we paid:
-3mil to get him now,
- plus 1mil if he has the promised appearances, (Max is really good at that),
-plus 1mil if we qualify for the CL (since we did under Pirlo, its impossible if we dont this year),
-plus 5% cut to them from a future sale
and
- also they have the right to refuse us a loan, which is precisely what we do with those children-talents.
They should really try very very hard to achieve a worse deal than that.
That kid better replace CR7!
-3mil to get him now,
- plus 1mil if he has the promised appearances, (Max is really good at that),
-plus 1mil if we qualify for the CL (since we did under Pirlo, its impossible if we dont this year),
-plus 5% cut to them from a future sale
and
- also they have the right to refuse us a loan, which is precisely what we do with those children-talents.
They should really try very very hard to achieve a worse deal than that.
That kid better replace CR7!
Last edited:
You mean Bertolucci, his agent, we are paying tribute to him, he was the reason Milan didn't got him...
As it is well known, we are the agents... waitress!
- - - Updated - - -
again you are wrong and its pathetic that you do it from personal empathy...
we did pay those 6mil after all, we always pay more than the rest and accept more insulting terms. Also be sure that we paid much more in bitcoins, to his agent, these are just the official bits for what his agent has promised to Santos.
We regularly pay tribute to such agents without immediate benefits or logic, some of them may randomly pay off, but they do not cover our current needs.
For example, replacing Ramsey, Frabotta, Demiral, add some wingback depth etc
This kid is not prolific enough to replace CR7 or Morata, neither creative enough to replace Dybala, Chiesa or Kulu.
He is a sub that might reach his potential and might be useful after a possible future sale.
And this comes at the expense of current and actual needs.
What exactly are you defending here??
As it is well known, we are the agents... waitress!
- - - Updated - - -
again you are wrong and its pathetic that you do it from personal empathy...
we did pay those 6mil after all, we always pay more than the rest and accept more insulting terms. Also be sure that we paid much more in bitcoins, to his agent, these are just the official bits for what his agent has promised to Santos.
We regularly pay tribute to such agents without immediate benefits or logic, some of them may randomly pay off, but they do not cover our current needs.
For example, replacing Ramsey, Frabotta, Demiral, add some wingback depth etc
This kid is not prolific enough to replace CR7 or Morata, neither creative enough to replace Dybala, Chiesa or Kulu.
He is a sub that might reach his potential and might be useful after a possible future sale.
And this comes at the expense of current and actual needs.
What exactly are you defending here??
Last edited:
People in this thread questioning the economics on this deal….
we’ve got him for 1.5m now, 1.5m in bonuses and a small percentage of the future fee. We’ve not paid 6m as Cronios says and whatever bitcoins/hens teeth/new Holland tractors we’ve paid his agent would have been paid as part of the pre contract anyway.
Also as far as I know not many on this forum have even seen him play, the ones that have rate him as a talent worth 15-20m. That’s a good deal unless you are blind.
Questioning his goal scoring… at the age of 19 he has scored more goals than Kane, Cristiano Ronaldo & Thierry Henry had at the same age. He’ll get better at that but his record is actually very good. People need to understand we’ve not signed the final product here we’ve signed someone that could develop into something special. And if he doesn’t then 3m isn’t exactly better spent elsewhere…
we’ve got him for 1.5m now, 1.5m in bonuses and a small percentage of the future fee. We’ve not paid 6m as Cronios says and whatever bitcoins/hens teeth/new Holland tractors we’ve paid his agent would have been paid as part of the pre contract anyway.
Also as far as I know not many on this forum have even seen him play, the ones that have rate him as a talent worth 15-20m. That’s a good deal unless you are blind.
Questioning his goal scoring… at the age of 19 he has scored more goals than Kane, Cristiano Ronaldo & Thierry Henry had at the same age. He’ll get better at that but his record is actually very good. People need to understand we’ve not signed the final product here we’ve signed someone that could develop into something special. And if he doesn’t then 3m isn’t exactly better spent elsewhere…
- Status