What I don't appreciate is moving the goalposts when all of a sudden it's our fans doing it. All these years we've (I at least) have been condemning Lazio and others for monkey chants and when it's our club we say "no, that's nothing to do with racism". In your words, that's double standards.
Oh, there's double standards alright, I'll give you that. If Lazio fans (or anyone else) would've picked on Momo, we would all express our shock and disgust at what we would call racism. Doesn't mean we would be right
per se though (see below).
I would think that by now it would be an established point that monkey chants are unacceptable, but all of a sudden we're back tracking on this? Why, because the fans said "we didn't mean it to be racist"?
We're not backtracking on anything. Racist chants are unacceptable full stop. The issue at stake here is whether or not the Ultras where singing racists chants. It seems to me that the answer to this is not clear cut, but I could be wrong; I mean, I'm not stupid, I know that most Ultra sections have a certain amount of right wing racists among them.
My point is that I'm tired hearing the word 'racist' whenever a black player is picked on. Nedved has been whistled during the whole match in Rome (Lazio): AFAIk no sanctions were taken and rightly so. Booing opposing players is part of the game; it's not nice, not ethical, not fair-play but it's like that. Why should we make a difference between a black Italian and a white Czech?
If the court decided, on the ground of conclusive evidence, that the chants were indeed racist, it was entitled to take the appropriate sanctions. If it decided "OMG they booed a black guy" then fuck'em.