Iraqi shot dead attempting goal (6 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

king Ale

Senior Member
Oct 28, 2004
21,689
Once you start murdering over a million people, what's the point in the number, IMO. He's the American Mao.
Once you start murdering a hundred of people, you're potentially able to kill a thousand of them, a million and consecutively a billion of them. How many politician in power you know who are not responsible, either directly or indirectly, for murdering at least one hundred of people? So, if you put Bush in the same group as Hitler, Stalin or Saddam Hussain, you'll have to expand that list to almost every president of every country from east to west.
 

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
ßüякε;1934320 said:
Yes.

Even if you embellish numbers and say Bush was "responsible" for, 2 or 2.5 or even 3 million people, he is still a fraction of either Stalin or Hitler.
If you're going to start editing posts, then at least be objective. Edit Bes's post before you edit mine, i know you don't think what he said is offensive but 1 billion people would disagree with you. So stop being a hypocrite.

Once you start murdering a hundred of people, you're potentially able to kill a thousand of them, a million and consecutively a billion of them. How many politician in power you know who are not responsible, either directly or indirectly, for murdering at least one hundred of people? So, if you put Bush in the same group as Hitler, Stalin or Saddam Hussain, you'll have to expand that list to almost every president of every country from east to west.
Exactly, which means that most arab presidents are included, But i'm not going to go into that for known reasons.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 6)