I guess its hard for you to consider, the fact I am saying the obvious in calling GREAT players are great and should not be dissed for players they are better then, as Diego is clearly better then Hamsik.
And oh, the other Brazilian I happend to "defend" was a certain Ronaldinho who is a brilliant player, and schmucks were saying he isnt good enough for Juve (saying Mutu is better....) when he is one of the greatest players in a long long time (one of those schmucks just said frigging Hamsik is preferred over Ronaldinho).
But ofcourse, its all about me defending brazilian players, and not resisting illogical crap like calling great players not good enough...
I really dig Hamsik, but its a frigging half-season! Talk about talking too soon, Diego being the best their is in Germany for years now is considered not enough, but Hamsik's half-season with a newly promoted side is enough? (how is it a better investment? Diego is as top notch of players as you can get in todays game, he shows he can deliver, Hamsik is much more unsure then he is) Btw, recall how Robinho was awesome in Santos? Well a 16-17 Diego was as good and at times better in those days.
B