I'd disagree. Sprinting makes you burn a lot of calories, but that's energy, not fat. You actually use sugar and don't burn fat.
Form what I understand, it's better to have a low intensity work out,at around 60% of your max heart rate (for a 20-25 year old, that would be +/- 126-132 Heatbeats/minute).
Why do you think women are training with leight weights and long, slow runs? These exercices actually burn fat and don't grow muscles.
That's a pretty weak argument. Look at long distance runners. They're skinny as hell. Sprinters are more muscle based, as they need more explosivity.
And btw, football players also rely on sprints, which they do several times a week in training, and that didn't stop some of them to have a small belly.
Form what I understand, it's better to have a low intensity work out,at around 60% of your max heart rate (for a 20-25 year old, that would be +/- 126-132 Heatbeats/minute).
Why do you think women are training with leight weights and long, slow runs? These exercices actually burn fat and don't grow muscles.
That's a pretty weak argument. Look at long distance runners. They're skinny as hell. Sprinters are more muscle based, as they need more explosivity.
And btw, football players also rely on sprints, which they do several times a week in training, and that didn't stop some of them to have a small belly.


bullshit !!
you burn fat as well with sprinting...and your metabolism remains high many hours after a sprint workout, forcing your body to burn more calories and fat
you use the example of women at the gym with slow runs, but let me ask you this...how many of those women every actually get into shape, or ppl who are on the cardio machine for 45 minutes at a time ?
Your body adjusts to those types of workouts rather quickly...
And you mention marathon runners...do they have anything but skin on their bodies ?? I see no fat or muscle for that matter
