isha00 said:
This can be considered good news. These are post of a lawyer and an expert in the matter. I tried to translated or summarize them the best I could.
Law or verdict,Comments of the ones writing
So, to summarize:
1)When a crime is suspected the competent Prosecution Office is the one that has to investigate on it. Napoli has nothing to do with all of this.
2)Privacy of correspondence and communications is guaranteed and can be violated only in some cases. Suspected sportive fraud is not one of them.
3)The results of the preliminary investigations are strictly secret. The responsible of making them public can get from 6 months to 5 years of reclusion, depending on the cases. The first extra-prosecution-office persons that can have a look in what was found out in the investigations are the investigated person and his lawyer. (Giraudo and Moggi got the “guarantee information” only after the taps had been already printed on newspapers)
4)Phone taps cannot be made public and cannot be used for different procedures that the ones they were disposed for, except in some cases, that don’t concern us. This means they can’t be used in other trials and can’t be used by the media.
5)A person can’t be in anyway considered guilty before the final verdict.
6)The results of the investigations were given/are about to be given to the sportive justice, that will decide a possible punishment. The phone taps, according to the law, to a verdict of the supreme court and to one of the European court of Justice, can’t be used in that trial. They will probably be used anyway (!!!!), but in the long run, that verdict should be made invalid. The problem is that “in the long run” means that that verdict would be made invalid probably only after we got a possible punishment.
Law or verdict,Comments of the ones writing
So, to summarize:
1)When a crime is suspected the competent Prosecution Office is the one that has to investigate on it. Napoli has nothing to do with all of this.
2)Privacy of correspondence and communications is guaranteed and can be violated only in some cases. Suspected sportive fraud is not one of them.
3)The results of the preliminary investigations are strictly secret. The responsible of making them public can get from 6 months to 5 years of reclusion, depending on the cases. The first extra-prosecution-office persons that can have a look in what was found out in the investigations are the investigated person and his lawyer. (Giraudo and Moggi got the “guarantee information” only after the taps had been already printed on newspapers)
4)Phone taps cannot be made public and cannot be used for different procedures that the ones they were disposed for, except in some cases, that don’t concern us. This means they can’t be used in other trials and can’t be used by the media.
5)A person can’t be in anyway considered guilty before the final verdict.
6)The results of the investigations were given/are about to be given to the sportive justice, that will decide a possible punishment. The phone taps, according to the law, to a verdict of the supreme court and to one of the European court of Justice, can’t be used in that trial. They will probably be used anyway (!!!!), but in the long run, that verdict should be made invalid. The problem is that “in the long run” means that that verdict would be made invalid probably only after we got a possible punishment.
Amazing post!!!
I knew that this all thing about recording phone was ilegal
Forza Juve!!!
Thanks Isha, +rep to you
