Giuseppe Marotta (80 Viewers)

[zizinho]

Lol you are the delusional one, coming up with excuses to suit your agenda, it was agreed last year, part of the berardi deal....Llorente refused offers....

Just assumptions without any proof.

lol, did i call you delusional?
lol, you still have to counter me with something about the deal being agreed last year, because absolute everything points towards it during the past year
lol, did i ever say it was part of the Berardi deal? have you trouble keeping track of everything?
lol, are you saying Llorente didnt reject to go to Monaco or the EPL, even if we received good offers which the club would have probably accepted?
lol, where is your proof then? i have more proof in one sentence than you in your whole agenda? would you come up with a good answer finally so we can continue this?

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Cheesio]

I like the idea of Morata, Mandzukic, Dybala, Coman, and a jack of all trades 5th striker. Morata-Mandzukic could probably work quite well in a front 2 if we had actually purchased a creative treq. they are very different players, with Morata enjoying more freedom to drift around, out wide, pick up the ball deep, run at defenders, etc. and Mandzukic being more the hardworking penalty box forward... But we haven't signed a creative treq, and part of that has to be wasting 18 mil on Zaza and not being able to offload Llorente's 4.5 mil wage. So that's a massive failure on the part of our management as things currently stand.

If we sign a top CAM, and manage to offload Llorente, this mercato will have been very good. If we don't, I don't even know how to rate it. It's pretty damn mediocre.

 

[DelpieroForLife]

But if Zaza was always looking for playing time why would he accept to come here at first place?

Even if we have managed to offload Llorente he would still be a 3rd choice ST, why would he sign to that?

 

[Cheesio]

lol, did i call you delusional?
lol, you still have to counter me with something about the deal being agreed last year, because absolute everything points towards it during the past year
lol, did i ever say it was part of the Berardi deal? have you trouble keeping track of everything?
lol, are you saying Llorente didnt reject to go to Monaco or the EPL, even if we received good offers which the club would have probably accepted?
lol, where is your proof then? i have more proof in one sentence than you in your whole agenda? would you come up with a good answer finally so we can continue this?

- You still have no proof that we agreed the price and to sign him last year, just a bunch of assumptions on your part so we can shift the blame from the management. Even if it's true, doesn't make this deal any better or any less ridiculous, in the contrary it make our mang looks short sighted.
- when i said its part of the berardi deal, i was speaking generally, it's one of the excuses that people brought forward to defend this deal when it was made.
- You have no proof that we recieved any offers for Llorente and furthermore no proof that he refused them.

 

[zizinho]

But if Zaza was always looking for playing time why would he accept to come here at first place?

Even if we have managed to offload Llorente he would still be a 3rd choice ST, why would he sign to that?

i think Zaza was meant for the role of a super sub. probably would have been subbed in in majority of the games around 60th minute for Morata/Mandzu (or a mid/defender if we chase a result) and get the occasional start in coppa games, when we rest players for CL, and when/if we secure the scudetto around march/april. Llorente staying decreases his chances of being that, and he doesent want to lose his place at Italy, so he and his agent are looking to get loaned somewhere, if what reported is true

 

[DelpieroForLife]

i think Zaza was meant for the role of a super sub. probably would have been subbed in in majority of the games around 60th minute for Morata/Mandzu (or a mid/defender if we chase a result) and get the occasional start in coppa games, when we rest players for CL, and when/if we secure the scudetto around march/april. Llorente staying decreases his chances of being that, and he doesent want to lose his place at Italy, so he and his agent are looking to get loaned somewhere, if what reported is true

If his aim to be among the Euro squad that won't be enough even if true.

 

[LiquidPLP]

I like the idea of Morata, Mandzukic, Dybala, Coman, and a jack of all trades 5th striker. Morata-Mandzukic could probably work quite well in a front 2 if we had actually purchased a creative treq. they are very different players, with Morata enjoying more freedom to drift around, out wide, pick up the ball deep, run at defenders, etc. and Mandzukic being more the hardworking penalty box forward... But we haven't signed a creative treq, and part of that has to be wasting 18 mil on Zaza and not being able to offload Llorente's 4.5 mil wage. So that's a massive failure on the part of our management as things currently stand.

If we sign a top CAM, and manage to offload Llorente, this mercato will have been very good. If we don't, I don't even know how to rate it. It's pretty damn mediocre.

We won't sell Llorente though. For some weird reason we always have three typical 9's.

At this point I don't think we're getting a proper AM. Yeah it's a huge failure but the time is running out and we have no options left it seems. Beppe is too busy offloading Zaza, De Ceglie and Isla too.

No point in panicking yet but I don't see any AMs on the market to be taken.

 

[zizinho]

- You still have no proof that we agreed the price and to sign him last year, just a bunch of assumptions on your part so we can shift the blame from the management. Even if it's true, doesn't make this deal any better or any less ridiculous, in the contrary it make our mang looks short sighted.
- when i said its part of the berardi deal, i was speaking generally, it's one of the excuses that people brought forward to defend this deal when it was made.
- You have no proof that we recieved any offers for Llorente and furthermore no proof that he refused them.

- im gonna give you a short version as i have no time for you, because you still repeat the same questions. last summer Sassuolo paid 7.5M for him. why would Sassuolo pay 7.5M for Zaza, a player that they co own with us, that would stay with them anyway as we didnt need him last summer? give me an answer for once, instead of the same stuff in every post. by paying 7.5M (which is too much, if they had the intention of buying him for themselves, surely they would pay less ex. look at Gabbiadini who had a better season that Zaza). so 1st you have to give me a good answer for this if you want to continue
-you clearly indicated it was one of my excuses, the Berardi point. i was arguing with people this summer that Zaza was not bought because of Berardi, but rather because we rate him so dont mention me that again.
-i wont bother looking but you can look up yourself in his thread or search the internet, we rejected an offer from Monaco, Tottenham was interested, other EPL teams were interested (cant say for sure they have also sent offers) and the only team from Spain was Sevilla from what i remember

- - - Updated - - -

If his aim to be among the Euro squad that won't be enough even if true.

are you sure? Italy lacks strikers and he is already in the squad. Conte is well aware of his qualities and i think he would take him for sure if he plays, especially if he scored a few crucial goals coming in as a sub. the other choices are Pelle, Immobile, Destro, Balotelli, none of them is in the category of our strikers that are ahead of Zaza, so he would have very good chances if he gets solid playing time at Juve.

 

[Cheesio]

- im gonna give you a short version as i have no time for you, because you still repeat the same questions. last summer Sassuolo paid 7.5M for him. why would Sassuolo pay 7.5M for Zaza, a player that they co own with us, that would stay with them anyway as we didnt need him last summer? give me an answer for once, instead of the same stuff in every post. by paying 7.5M (which is too much, if they had the intention of buying him for themselves, surely they would pay less ex. look at Gabbiadini who had a better season that Zaza). so 1st you have to give me a good answer for this if you want to continue

So just because they paid 7,5 mil for the half of promising striker, you assume we agreed to sign him last year for 18 mil, going by your logic we could've signed him last for far more less and loaned him to Sassulo or to another team.

-you clearly indicated it was one of my excuses, the Berardi point. i was arguing with people this summer that Zaza was not bought because of Berardi, but rather because we rate him so dont mention me that again

Wasn't talking about you, was talking in general.

i wont bother looking but you can look up yourself in his thread or search the internet, we rejected an offer from Monaco, Tottenham was interested, other EPL teams were interested (cant say for sure they have also sent offers) and the only team from Spain was Sevilla from what i remember

So you are saying we rejected an offer form Monaco ?? why ?

 

[DUKAC]

you are saying its Beppes fault, you should explain how. we have a player incoming that was agreed to come here last summer. that player would have arrived no matter what, unless he himself rejected a move like Berardi. you have another player that rejected good offers for the club because he prefers to either stay or return to stay. so you actually receive offers for him but cant sell because he refuses. whos fault is that exactly?

We all should learn how to defend our own views about some Juve officials from this post doesn't matter if they do something wrong or not.This attitude of defending at any price.Priceless.

 

[zizinho]

So just because they paid 7,5 mil for the half of promising striker, you assume we agreed to sign him last year for 18 mil, going by your logic we could've signed him last for far more less and loaned him to Sassulo or to another team.

i give up

So you are saying we rejected an offer form Monaco ?? why ?

i already said why. Llorente didnt want to go there

- - - Updated - - -

We all should learn how to defend our own views about some Juve officials from this post doesn't matter if they do something wrong or not.This attitude of defending at any price.Priceless.

do you have anything relevant to say or are you just taking away space today?

 

[DUKAC]

i give up




i already said why. Llorente didnt want to go there

- - - Updated - - -



do you have anything relevant to say or are you just taking away space today?

What do you think?I wrote what I had to say.Keep defending Beppe doesn't matter what move he makes.Just keep doing that.He can't find better defender even if he tries hard.Hail him whenever he makes a good transfer equally as, to blame him when he makes a bad move like this.Just don't be blind and biased.That's all.

 

[zizinho]

What do you think?I wrote what I had to say.Keep defending Beppe doesn't matter what move he makes.Just keep doing that.He can't find better defender even if he tries hard.Hail him whenever he makes a good transfer equally as, to blame him when he makes a bad move like this.Just don't be blind and biased.That's all.

ok so nothing relevant

 

[DUKAC]

ok so nothing relevant

Yeah.Nothing to be alert of defending god himself.

 

[zizinho]

Yeah.Nothing to be alert of defending god himself.

good. bye

 

[Klin]

you are saying its Beppes fault, you should explain how. we have a player incoming that was agreed to come here last summer. that player would have arrived no matter what, unless he himself rejected a move like Berardi. you have another player that rejected good offers for the club because he prefers to either stay or return to stay. so you actually receive offers for him but cant sell because he refuses. whos fault is that exactly?

I already explained how. It's not my fault you can't read.

Agreed by whom? Beppe of course. You make it sound as if he had no other option but to accept him. Are you even reading what you're posting?

Which good offers are you talking about? Did Beppe come out and confirm that Llorente rejected any moves? Or any one from Juve for the matter? Or are you just spewing shit out of your hairy ass as usual?

You can't blame Llorente for not wanting to leave for half his wages when he could simply stay for the rest of his contract here which Beppe himself agreed to give him btw.

- - - Updated - - -

i think Zaza was meant for the role of a super sub. probably would have been subbed in in majority of the games around 60th minute for Morata/Mandzu (or a mid/defender if we chase a result) and get the occasional start in coppa games, when we rest players for CL, and when/if we secure the scudetto around march/april. Llorente staying decreases his chances of being that, and he doesent want to lose his place at Italy, so he and his agent are looking to get loaned somewhere, if what reported is true

So Zaza was actually part of our plans? As in we wanted him here, no?

 

[Suns]

zazinho

 

[baggio]

 

[PedroFlu]

I have to wonder if we agreed to some mandatory buyback last summer, with the amount Sassuolo paid us for Zaza's half. I just don't get this move otherwise. If it was an optional buyback clause, why the hell would we redeem him at that amount, especially before having offloaded Llorente. It makes me think there was some mandatory buyback inserted in the initial deal, which in itself would be pretty ridiculous, but not the sheer idiocy of buying Zaza of our own volition this summer, without first offloading Llorente.

Any decision to buy him, wether this summer or before, is stupid. It gets worse because of the overpaying.

- - - Updated - - -

Marotta shat on the bed on this one, I don't see why it's so hard to admit the guy can fuck up on some operations.

Still waiting for the super AM he promised.

 

[CrimsonianKing]

I didn't know Zizinho loved Imhotep that much. That's true love, bros.