Giuseppe Marotta (135 Viewers)
- Thread starter Mark
- Start date
- Tags asmr is so cool a_legend butthurt_tuz curtains dai is a feminist rus bangs hookers was holding us back
Not sure what all the fuzz is about here.
We got Zaza, because
1) we need a 3rd striker anyway
2) valueing him 18 mil, and later use him in the player exchange with Berardi to lower the price...by 18 mil.
3) we expected we would be able to sell llorente
But what happens now
1) Llorente has been linked with several teams, yet the same story comes out about his wages
2) No @Klin , Marotta isnt going to come out saying we failed the loan deal each time. I wonder if he's gonna respond to Llorente questions when he actually gets one, wich didnt happen iirc ?
3) so we basically got a 4.5mil wage striker, that nobody can afford on loan. And a 18mil worth striker on a little wages who's inferior to llorente.
4) That is 1 striker too much.
5) We decide to loan the striker we actually can loan, wich is zaza, while this was not the plan. It became then plan when we couldnt offload LLorente.
Is this a problem
1) Nah, Llorente or zaza as backup ? i'll probably pick Llorente as i'm not a fan of zaza, altho Nando is not worth his wages currently.
2) The loan is 2 mil + 16 mil buyout. aa 18 mil, our valuation for zaza.
3) If they dont take the option, we'll get Berardi and give zaza to lower the fee by 18 mil
4) if they take the option, we got 18 mil in our hand, so we can get Berardi for the full price.
Conclusion : We got Zaza as backup. We failed to sell Nando. Its probably wages. We loan Zaza cause we we got one striker too much and he's the one we actually can loan.
You can now go on saying how Marotta failed to convince some team to take over his 4.5 mil wages and all. But thats about the only thing worth discussing.
We got Zaza, because
1) we need a 3rd striker anyway
2) valueing him 18 mil, and later use him in the player exchange with Berardi to lower the price...by 18 mil.
3) we expected we would be able to sell llorente
But what happens now
1) Llorente has been linked with several teams, yet the same story comes out about his wages
2) No @Klin , Marotta isnt going to come out saying we failed the loan deal each time. I wonder if he's gonna respond to Llorente questions when he actually gets one, wich didnt happen iirc ?
3) so we basically got a 4.5mil wage striker, that nobody can afford on loan. And a 18mil worth striker on a little wages who's inferior to llorente.
4) That is 1 striker too much.
5) We decide to loan the striker we actually can loan, wich is zaza, while this was not the plan. It became then plan when we couldnt offload LLorente.
Is this a problem
1) Nah, Llorente or zaza as backup ? i'll probably pick Llorente as i'm not a fan of zaza, altho Nando is not worth his wages currently.
2) The loan is 2 mil + 16 mil buyout. aa 18 mil, our valuation for zaza.
3) If they dont take the option, we'll get Berardi and give zaza to lower the fee by 18 mil
4) if they take the option, we got 18 mil in our hand, so we can get Berardi for the full price.
Conclusion : We got Zaza as backup. We failed to sell Nando. Its probably wages. We loan Zaza cause we we got one striker too much and he's the one we actually can loan.
You can now go on saying how Marotta failed to convince some team to take over his 4.5 mil wages and all. But thats about the only thing worth discussing.
So what is the fucking point of this post for example? You've said absolutely nothing, except trying to tingle Beppe's ass.
This is really not that hard to figure out. Last season we had Tevez, Morata, Llorente, Matri and Coman. Matri was a sure goner. We brought Dybala even before we knew Tevez was leaving. That so far leaves us with Tevez, Morata, Dybala, Llorente, Coman.
Tevez requests to leave. We brought in Manduzkic, so we now we have the Croat, Morata, Dybala, Llorente and Coman. 5 strikers.
Now what happens? We ASSUME that Llorente would receive an offer that he actually accepts, and we went full retard with Zaza, ending up with 6 strikers. How the fuck is it not our fault that we're in this situation?
This is really not that hard to figure out. Last season we had Tevez, Morata, Llorente, Matri and Coman. Matri was a sure goner. We brought Dybala even before we knew Tevez was leaving. That so far leaves us with Tevez, Morata, Dybala, Llorente, Coman.
Tevez requests to leave. We brought in Manduzkic, so we now we have the Croat, Morata, Dybala, Llorente and Coman. 5 strikers.
Now what happens? We ASSUME that Llorente would receive an offer that he actually accepts, and we went full retard with Zaza, ending up with 6 strikers. How the fuck is it not our fault that we're in this situation?
rekt
Klinn is like a guy you hand a manual, on how to change a tire. He'll pretend to read it and then trows it on the ground and starts shouting "HOW DO I CHANGR A TIRE". Like a rampaging toddler.
I said, we planned to sell llorente. We couldnt do that so we change our plan. I specifically said "feel free to debate wether the failure to sell is his fault".
Then he posts that thing. Its best to have some patience with Klin today it seems.
I said, we planned to sell llorente. We couldnt do that so we change our plan. I specifically said "feel free to debate wether the failure to sell is his fault".
Then he posts that thing. Its best to have some patience with Klin today it seems.
