Gay Adoption (6 Viewers)

Noodle

★ ★ ★
Jul 29, 2007
2,501
Like I said, the few studies I briefly looked at said that the risk was only marginally higher. There are people with certain hereditary diseases, should we ban them from having children too?

In any case, it is only indirect and potential harm.
I guess I'll just leave it to the experts. But I do agree with the main principal, though. If two adult siblings want to get it on, then it's really none of my business.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Noodle

★ ★ ★
Jul 29, 2007
2,501
I'm fucking speechless...most of you are fucking retarted. So you are better people than gays, ohh wait ofcourse you are since you believe in some god of yours that doesn't even exist.

People who are bashing gays are just racists and it would be same as I would call someone nigger who can't take care of his/her child.

P.S. This wasn't trolling, I just told you guys my honest opinion.
This I agree with. Homophobia = racism, pretty much.
 

Zlatan

Senior Member
Jun 9, 2003
23,049
By measuring who has bigger dong?



Wouldn't harm the society. Better than having two fathers holding hand by hand in the park while their little boys looking for some 10yo Jamal to screw them in the gardens.

What the hell are you even talking about? SO it would be better if a man and woman were holding hands while a 10 year old girl was looking for a Jamal to screw them in the gardens? You are making no sense.
 

Kate

Moderator
Feb 7, 2011
18,598
What if i consented to someone eating me? You'd have two consenting adults that are willing to engage in cannibalism. Do you think we should allow them or not?
That actually happened in Germany (where else? ;)), and I think the man was only convicted of manslaughter. If it is consensual, then why not? The man wanted to commit suicide, and that was his chosen method. I agree that it is absolutely disgusting, but they didn't ask me what I thought.
 

Azzurri7

Pinturicchio
Moderator
Dec 16, 2003
72,691
But what if the single person is gay?
I knew you'd ask this. It's okay in my books so long there's no man(gay) + man(gay) in the house having babies.

Also a child/baby needs a mother/babysitter/nany or whatever, it is proved that men alone can't take care of babies.
 

Azzurri7

Pinturicchio
Moderator
Dec 16, 2003
72,691
What the hell are you even talking about? SO it would be better if a man and woman were holding hands while a 10 year old girl was looking for a Jamal to screw them in the gardens? You are making no sense.
A man + woman wouldn't necessarily mean girls turning into whores. But a man + man living under one shelf and having a child/kid around isn't healthy that is for sure.
 

Klin

نحن الروبوتات
May 27, 2009
61,697
A man + woman wouldn't necessarily mean girls turning into whores. But a man + man living under one shelf and having a child/kid around isn't healthy that is for sure.
It's 6 a.m. Kid is sleeping between his fathers. Alarm clock goes ringing:


It's a problem.
 

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
125,418
I knew you'd ask this. It's okay in my books so long there's no man(gay) + man(gay) in the house having babies.

Also a child/baby needs a mother/babysitter/nany or whatever, it is proved that men alone can't take care of babies.
Is it really proven that men alone can't take care of babies? Because what I witness in my daily life that the society I am living, men can take care of babies just as efficiently as women if not better. Do you know that we get paid for 18 months paternity leave in Sweden, not only that we also get an extra bonus if both parents (notice, I said parents as sex is insignificant) take an equal number of time at home. One parent is paid at a time, that means both cannot register themselves as taking care of the baby.

I find this insulting actually as I myself know that I can take care of a baby all by myself, I have done it and I know I will do it for even longer periods than I already have. And not only I will enjoy it but I learn a lot by spending quality times with my son.
 

Azzurri7

Pinturicchio
Moderator
Dec 16, 2003
72,691
Is that picture supposed to prove me wrong?

It's very simple, historically, in our daily life, scientifically, a baby needs a mother or women be it Granny, Aunt or even house made.

In Europe, Middle-East and Africa at least the places where I've lived and seen a lot, single or divorced men usually do leave their kids or babies with women. There can be few exceptions, VERY VERY few but you wont convince me than a man can raise up a child like a mother.
 

Noodle

★ ★ ★
Jul 29, 2007
2,501
A man + woman wouldn't necessarily mean girls turning into whores. But a man + man living under one shelf and having a child/kid around isn't healthy that is for sure.
But it's not for sure at all. If it's a stable and loving family, why would it not be healthy?
 

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
125,418
Is that picture supposed to prove me wrong?

It's very simple, historically, in our daily life, scientifically, a baby needs a mother or women be it Granny, Aunt or even house made.

In Europe, Middle-East and Africa at least the places where I've lived and seen a lot, single or divorced men usually do leave their kids or babies with women. There can be few exceptions, VERY VERY few but you wont convince me than a man can raise up a child like a mother.
Where scientifically does it say that a baby needs a woman?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 6)