Florent Malouda (7 Viewers)
- Thread starter Dostoevsky
- Start date
- Status
would you buy quaresma after you've saw him in Inter? No! because he is a flop.. i don't give a fuck he used to be good in porto.
now look at malouda, 2 goals and 1 assist for an entire season at chelsea. This makes Alex the chelsea defender a better forward than he is
Scolari Mourinho and Grant chose KALOU (who sucks more than marchionni lool) over him.
We are talking about THE PAVEL NEDVED REPLACEMENT .. remember what nedved was like? think back 2003... NEDVED WHO REPLACED ZIDANE.
you expect me to accept
ZIDANE===>NEDVED===>MALOUDA
FUCK NO! NOT EVEN IF HE PAYS US TO PLAY
now look at malouda, 2 goals and 1 assist for an entire season at chelsea. This makes Alex the chelsea defender a better forward than he is
Scolari Mourinho and Grant chose KALOU (who sucks more than marchionni lool) over him.We are talking about THE PAVEL NEDVED REPLACEMENT .. remember what nedved was like? think back 2003... NEDVED WHO REPLACED ZIDANE.
you expect me to accept
ZIDANE===>NEDVED===>MALOUDA
FUCK NO! NOT EVEN IF HE PAYS US TO PLAY
Well, I have seen about a dozen Chelsea performances when they were Kalouless. Malouda stepped in on a few occasions and he has found the unsophisticated style pf play that characterizes about 80% of EPL tactical defensive play difficult to cope with.
You know the thing where about 3 defenders all go chasing the ball like a greyhound chasing the hare at a dog track. Quite simply he is not cut out for it.
As we know in France, Spain and Italy there is more time and space to be more artistic. Not to mention the ball is not banged up in the air every thirty seconds like a Sunday pub match or a kickabout in a school playground.
Malouda would probably come cheap/er but I see our future progressing with more certainty not with Malouda or Diego but with Hamsik.
You know the thing where about 3 defenders all go chasing the ball like a greyhound chasing the hare at a dog track. Quite simply he is not cut out for it.
As we know in France, Spain and Italy there is more time and space to be more artistic. Not to mention the ball is not banged up in the air every thirty seconds like a Sunday pub match or a kickabout in a school playground.
Malouda would probably come cheap/er but I see our future progressing with more certainty not with Malouda or Diego but with Hamsik.
OP
OP
But Secco said in an interview lately that they're still considering Diego and that they aren't interested in bringing Hamsik, although we can agree he suits better our system. It's explainable easily, they won't buy him for 25 m euro or more when they could've bought him for 5 times less after Serie B campaign. Media would destroy them now if they overpaid that much and it would be confession to a mistake of not buying him earlier.
OP
It's not exactly Nedved's role because Diego spends more time in forward than Pavel.And I've never seen Diego play something like that.I always see him playing as AMC so I don't know if he'd be capable of covering the left side as well.
This sort of formation would be complicated and we'd need really good left back for it.
I don't know if I'd take the risk to buy Malouda but he wouldn't be too expensive and I think he'd play well in Serie A.Still,risk is too big.
I think Zhirkov would be perfect for us.He got everything we need and want.
But lets not make fast decisions and see how things are going.Main question now is,why not Giovinco there?He was great in Coppa.He was pretty much unstoppable on the left while he did a great in attack with those passes with Alex.
Buffon
Ivanovic-Chiellini-Legro-De Ceglie
Camo-Sissoko-Hamsik-Giovinco
Amauri/Trez-Del Piero
back ups
Manninger
Grygera-Mellberg-Sakho-Molinaro
Gourcuff-Marchisio-Tiago/Poulsen-De Ceglie
Iaquinta-Trez
Ivanovic can play as RB while he can cover CB spot as well so he would be perfect for us.
Hamsik would be great there I think.
Sakho-future signing,we'd rotate him with Legro and give him starting spot next year while we loan out Ariaudo.
Gourcuff-I don't think he'd mind this role because Camo is injured often enough so he'd get his time.
Ivanovic-12
Hamsik-20
Gourcuff-13?
Sakho-6
--------------
51mln euros
sell:Marchionni,Zebina and Tiago or Poulsen if we lack money.
Marchionni-4
Zebina-5
------
9 (or 17)
so that would be 42mln euros needed to buy those players.Or if we sell Tiago/Poulsen it's ~34.
This sort of formation would be complicated and we'd need really good left back for it.
I don't know if I'd take the risk to buy Malouda but he wouldn't be too expensive and I think he'd play well in Serie A.Still,risk is too big.
I think Zhirkov would be perfect for us.He got everything we need and want.
But lets not make fast decisions and see how things are going.Main question now is,why not Giovinco there?He was great in Coppa.He was pretty much unstoppable on the left while he did a great in attack with those passes with Alex.
Buffon
Ivanovic-Chiellini-Legro-De Ceglie
Camo-Sissoko-Hamsik-Giovinco
Amauri/Trez-Del Piero
back ups
Manninger
Grygera-Mellberg-Sakho-Molinaro
Gourcuff-Marchisio-Tiago/Poulsen-De Ceglie
Iaquinta-Trez
Ivanovic can play as RB while he can cover CB spot as well so he would be perfect for us.
Hamsik would be great there I think.
Sakho-future signing,we'd rotate him with Legro and give him starting spot next year while we loan out Ariaudo.
Gourcuff-I don't think he'd mind this role because Camo is injured often enough so he'd get his time.
Ivanovic-12
Hamsik-20
Gourcuff-13?
Sakho-6
--------------
51mln euros
sell:Marchionni,Zebina and Tiago or Poulsen if we lack money.
Marchionni-4
Zebina-5
------
9 (or 17)
so that would be 42mln euros needed to buy those players.Or if we sell Tiago/Poulsen it's ~34.
- Status