Fernando Llorente - ST - Athletic Bilbao (23 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Badass J Elkann

It's time to go!!
Feb 12, 2006
69,061
Thanks mark for the info.

Badass has a point about drogba and llorente. If we get llorente... we will go full on him and he WILL be the promised top striker. We will be stuck wioth him for the next 3 years or so.... and in case we would like to buy someone else in case of him failing... it would be tough.


On the otehr hand..... Drogba is in his last year maybe of football... but like all the greats, he has class in him and is not like he suddenly turned into crap by playing in china. We can use him as a band aid (a luxury band aid i would say), to carry us thru the rest of the CL campaign.... and then buy a real long term solution by the end of the season.

Is not mad at all if you ask me.... because im pretty sure that drogba would fit like a glove in our team-
Exactly. Unfortunately there are far too many people who cant see this logic and happy to hope that matri is going to lead us in europe as if he is the second coming of jesus
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Dominic

Senior Member
Jan 30, 2004
16,706
Llorente does not need to be the second coming of jesus. Nor is he going to be bought solely for his goal scoring prowess. Our team is able to reach the attack quicky, directly and from any position. What better to have than a giant who can controll the ball more than adequately on the receiving end?
 

petersmit

Senior Member
Mar 14, 2006
7,031
11/12=29 goals and 6 assists in 4063 minutes
10/11=23 goals and 6 assists in 3853 minutes
09/10=23 goals and 9 assists in 4109 minutes
08/09=19 goals and 7 assists in 3760 minutes

he scores goals... but not like a 5 million a year striker... he needs more than 100 minutes to either score or assist.. that is not that good in my opinion...

take a look at some other strikers:

tevez in 10/11: 25 goals and 13 assists in 3961 minutes
dzeko in 11/12: 20 goals and 10 assists in 2942 minutes
drogba in 10/11: 17 goals and 21 assists in 3788 minutes
lewandowski in 11/12: 35 goals and 13 assists in 4794 minutes
suarez in 10/11: 24 goals and 18 assists in 4235 minutes
cardozo in 11/12: 29 goals and 7 assists in 3749 minutes
soldado in 10/11: 25 goals and 4 assists in 2975 minutes

all these players have had a year or more in where they scored goals and assisted goals once in the 100 minutes... llorente is far away from that...

in my opinion he isn't worth 5 million a freaking season... i'd rather give drogba 2.5 million for the next half year and break the bank for lets say dzeko in the summer...
 

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
89,029
11/12=29 goals and 6 assists in 4063 minutes
10/11=23 goals and 6 assists in 3853 minutes
09/10=23 goals and 9 assists in 4109 minutes
08/09=19 goals and 7 assists in 3760 minutes

he scores goals... but not like a 5 million a year striker... he needs more than 100 minutes to either score or assist.. that is not that good in my opinion...

take a look at some other strikers:

tevez in 10/11: 25 goals and 13 assists in 3961 minutes
dzeko in 11/12: 20 goals and 10 assists in 2942 minutes
drogba in 10/11: 17 goals and 21 assists in 3788 minutes
lewandowski in 11/12: 35 goals and 13 assists in 4794 minutes
suarez in 10/11: 24 goals and 18 assists in 4235 minutes
cardozo in 11/12: 29 goals and 7 assists in 3749 minutes
soldado in 10/11: 25 goals and 4 assists in 2975 minutes

all these players have had a year or more in where they scored goals and assisted goals once in the 100 minutes... llorente is far away from that...

in my opinion he isn't worth 5 million a freaking season... i'd rather give drogba 2.5 million for the next half year and break the bank for lets say dzeko in the summer...
You should compare the players which Llorente had behind him while scoring goals, and the other strikers.
 

petersmit

Senior Member
Mar 14, 2006
7,031
You should compare the players which Llorente had behind him while scoring goals, and the other strikers.
you're implying that with our squad behind him, llorente would be one of those strikers that scores goals like there is no tomorrow?

because he was facing the defenders in la liga... i think even amauri would look good with the defenders of getafe or granada around him...

is llorente worth 5 million a year?
 

Buck Fuddy

Lara Chedraoui fanboy
May 22, 2009
10,897
Llorente does not need to be the second coming of jesus. Nor is he going to be bought solely for his goal scoring prowess. Our team is able to reach the attack quicky, directly and from any position. What better to have than a giant who can controll the ball more than adequately on the receiving end?
True.

But I'd like to think you can get that type of player for half those (rumoured) wages. If you're going to sign someone who'll be earning substantially more than Buffon & Pirlo, I'd expect that player to be truly excellent.
 

K.O.

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2005
13,883
You should compare the players which Llorente had behind him while scoring goals, and the other strikers.
Exactly. To be this consistent with a team like Athletic Bilbao over the years is quite an achievement really.

Llorente is a quality bargain.
 

Klovn

#MakeTuzGreatAgain
Jul 28, 2011
21,859
11/12=29 goals and 6 assists in 4063 minutes
10/11=23 goals and 6 assists in 3853 minutes
09/10=23 goals and 9 assists in 4109 minutes
08/09=19 goals and 7 assists in 3760 minutes

he scores goals... but not like a 5 million a year striker... he needs more than 100 minutes to either score or assist.. that is not that good in my opinion...

take a look at some other strikers:

tevez in 10/11: 25 goals and 13 assists in 3961 minutes
dzeko in 11/12: 20 goals and 10 assists in 2942 minutes
drogba in 10/11: 17 goals and 21 assists in 3788 minutes
lewandowski in 11/12: 35 goals and 13 assists in 4794 minutes
suarez in 10/11: 24 goals and 18 assists in 4235 minutes
cardozo in 11/12: 29 goals and 7 assists in 3749 minutes
soldado in 10/11: 25 goals and 4 assists in 2975 minutes

all these players have had a year or more in where they scored goals and assisted goals once in the 100 minutes... llorente is far away from that...

in my opinion he isn't worth 5 million a freaking season... i'd rather give drogba 2.5 million for the next half year and break the bank for lets say dzeko in the summer...
:lol:
 

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
89,029
you're implying that with our squad behind him, llorente would be one of those strikers that scores goals like there is no tomorrow?

because he was facing the defenders in la liga... i think even amauri would look good with the defenders of getafe or granada around him...

is llorente worth 5 million a year?
It depends who else is available for that much money. But of course they scored more since they had Silva and others behind them.

I always hear about horrible defense in La Liga, but every year I see them reaches semis and finals in CL and EL, even 3 out of 4 teams.
 

petersmit

Senior Member
Mar 14, 2006
7,031
he played vs. barcelona 19 times and scored only 4 goals... I'm scared that he isn't the striker we are looking for... weren't we looking for a striker that could make the difference by himself? A ibrahimovic type of player that could turn the game arround or something like that?
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,795
he played vs. barcelona 19 times and scored only 4 goals... I'm scared that he isn't the striker we are looking for... weren't we looking for a striker that could make the difference by himself? A ibrahimovic type of player that could turn the game arround or something like that?
So given that Fernando Torres scored 7 goals against Barcelona in 10 matches, you're suggesting we should sign him instead??? :confused:
 

petersmit

Senior Member
Mar 14, 2006
7,031
some people on this forum are fapping over torres yes... but I'm not.. dzeko all the way :tuttosport:

I'm just asking questions to understand why everyone would love llorente in juventus... he is a spanish striker who would have to come to italy and immediately succeed.. I just don't see that happening and I'm affraid we would have another amauri in our squad (get some time... won't score... dissapears on the bench because some other striker does score... and have a huge wage bill because he "couldn't addapt to italian football") if you catch my drift

edit: and no i am not comparing llorente to amauri.. i mean that from the financial perspective... 5 million a season is a lot of cash
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,795
A Torres move here would be good for his career, because he wouldn't have to face Chiellini -- the ultimate anti-Torres -- other than at Vinovo. :strong:
 

Cheesio

**********
Jul 11, 2006
22,514
I've seen Llorente play plenty of times and this is my take on him.

He'll be a very good signing for this team, the salary that is required is maybe high but you gain on the transfer fee because his contract is soon ending, that's a plus.
He's a very good goal scorer, incredible with his head, he'll come handfull because he's accustomed to playing with back to the goal and his good at it. He's quite technical despite his frame, can cantrol the ball and pass with both feet and play those one touch passes that we all hope Matri would've been able to play. His movemenet off the ball isn't as good as Matri because he always plays with his back to the goal and only start running toward the goals when the ball is at the wings.
He's not the top player we all hope we sign, the one who could receive the ball at the top of the box and produce magic like Zlatan, Aguero, Benzema or Falcao but he's a good goal scorer and we desperately need that.
My last point is that i think that Llorente would work better in a 4-3-3.
 

petersmit

Senior Member
Mar 14, 2006
7,031
I've seen Llorente play plenty of times and this is my take on him.

He'll be a very good signing for this team, the salary that is required is maybe high but you gain on the transfer fee because his contract is soon ending, that's a plus.
He's a very good goal scorer, incredible with his head, he'll come handfull because he's accustomed to playing with back to the goal and his good at it. He's quite technical despite his frame, can cantrol the ball and pass with both feet and play those one touch passes that we all hope Matri would've been able to play. His movemenet off the ball isn't as good as Matri because he always plays with his back to the goal and only start running toward the goals when the ball is at the wings.
He's not the top player we all hope we sign, the one who could receive the ball at the top of the box and produce magic like Zlatan, Aguero, Benzema or Falcao but he's a good goal scorer and we desperately need that.
My last point is that i think that Llorente would work better in a 4-3-3.
you think we are going back to 4-3-3 with these signings?

if we get him for free the 5 million a year won't matter that much.. true...

substituting bendtner for llorente in the winter.. :tuttosport: lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 15)