Hahahagaha you guys all are biased, Italy was normal against Spain but Spain had the game in total control, like Spain never was in real problem while Italy struggled against Croatia , Ireland and tonight probably too.
Hahahagaha you guys all are biased, Italy was normal against Spain but Spain had the game in total control, like Spain never was in real problem while Italy struggled against Croatia , Ireland and tonight probably too.
Why you go off topic? I think you are the one who is biased! Italy outplayed Spain. And I say it again other teams give so much respect to Spain. France has enough quality to play their game without being bothered about Spain's possession bullcrap.
Hahahagaha you guys all are biased, Italy was normal against Spain but Spain had the game in total control, like Spain never was in real problem while Italy struggled against Croatia , Ireland and tonight probably too.
Showed what you saw, Italy outplayed all of those teams, the Ireland game was their worst. Towards the end of the first 2 games they struggled due to fitness.
i dont think either teams outplayed each other. The scoreline was fair. spain wil always have most posession in a match but that doesnt entirely mean they outplayed. it just means they had they had more of the ball but couldnt do shit. If italy go past england and thats a big IF. Then history shows you wouldnt want to bet against the azzurri. They could unite as a team and grow in confidence. Spain didnt look great aganst france, if anything, there going to be under a lot of pressure to go ahead and win it. I wouldnt want to be del bosque right now.
If Spain had a striker, Italy would have getting past Spain's midfield more often, and could have scored goals, Torres only had chances because the Italy defecne were tired at that point.
---------- Post added 24.06.2012 at 16:45 ----------
Hahahagaha you guys all are biased, Italy was normal against Spain but Spain had the game in total control, like Spain never was in real problem while Italy struggled against Croatia , Ireland and tonight probably too.
If Spain had a striker, Italy would have getting past Spain's midfield more often, and could have scored goals, Torres only had chances because the Italy defecne were tired at that point.
If Spain had a striker, Italy would have getting past Spain's midfield more often, and could have scored goals, Torres only had chances because the Italy defecne were tired at that point.
---------- Post added 24.06.2012 at 16:45 ----------
with a striker spain is much more dangerous and they are still as able to keep the ball in possesion , del bosque made the same mistake yersterday , without putting a striker spain have a very sterile attack
torres created the chances for himself , with a striker spain is much more dangerous and they are still as able to keep the ball in possesion , del bosque made the same mistake yersterday , without putting a striker spain have a very sterile attack
Don't believe that at all if Torres started the game he wouldnt have had those chances. The defense would have been sharp in the beginning and then he would have been just as tired in the second half. Those chances arrived only because of the situation and not torres
with a striker spain is much more dangerous and they are still as able to keep the ball in possesion , del bosque made the same mistake yersterday , without putting a striker spain have a very sterile attack
Don't believe that at all if Torres started the game he wouldnt have had those chances. The defense would have been sharp in the beginning and then he would have been just as tired in the second half. Those chances arrived only because of the situation and not torres