Here we are three days after the bombings and when I thought hmm may be this regime can't be any dumber than the Mb who went full retard with issuing the above threats for violence on their channels. Turns out this regime is still insisting on being on par with the MB.
I mention the three day mark, because to this moment the Egyptian public is left to speculation as to the real number of soldiers who passed away as a result of the attacks. Some sources state 20, where as other sources state 40's and the militants who carried out the strikes put them around the 100 mark. The bbc chooses to go with the average and has them at 30 soldiers and civilians to have lost their lives.
things have not changed, and the security mentality is pretty much intact!! I would've expected Sisi considering he is the head of the state to come out to the people and give them the facts with full transparency. I think the people deserve to know the number of people who died, I think Egyptians owe to know who is behind such attacks and with whose aid was this strike accomplished, I think they owe us to tell us why such a strike took place (and without reverting to dumb comments like this strike was in response to the successful campaign the armed forces has carried out for the past year and a half) and more importantly what and how will the government do to prevent such attacks. note: the soldiers killed where as usual attacked by surprise a concept I feel the armed forces can't get thru to its mind, that the enemy will not come face to face that this is not a traditional war between two sets of armies but it's more like a hit and run enemy.
sadly however instead of getting answers to the above questions, we had Sisi come out and tickle the emotions of the people (many of whom see he has zero responsibility for the attack, NOTE: Egyptians have been prepared to receive such a speech after all the media has prepared their minds and the MB issuing the threats have made it easy for the regime to somehow get out of this with minor changes to the heads of the army stationed in Sinai)
what you get from his speech is the following:
1- he is willing to sacrifice his life for the country (someone please remind him its 2015 already not the 1960's!! and the people did not vote him to office so he can die for this country but for exactly the opposite that no one else dies for no reason!)
2- that this war against terrorism is going to last for a long time. (I understand this all too well, however you would imagine he would at least acknowledge that the bombing and shelling of Sinai is not the only solution or at least the fact other alternatives should go hand in hand with the all out smoking guns approach the regime has always taken to counter this cancer that has been fermenting in Sinai of all places due to decades of neglect!!)
3- that this terror is being financed and supported by certain nations. (as usual, and just like Morsy before him, and Mubarak before all of them he never names these countries or organizations!! leaving the media feed the speculation frenzy and off course the end result is a citizen sitting willing to accept any BS even if no evidence is provided as long as no one questions the suspects, god forbid you do you will be subjected to criticism by everyone around you and that includes your close family members!)
off course the media wasted no time (NOTE: you would imagine there is a difference between state owned and private owned media! well not in my beloved Egypt they both dance to the same tune

) in rolling in the prefabricated suspect line plus the eternal conspiracy that accompanies. without fail Hamas makes its millionth appearance, the Mb off course gets an honorable mention (makes you wonder why they even bothered to mention them considering the MB have made an awesome job getting themselves in the shit storm) Turkey, Qatar (funding, and hosting of mb members on its land which is true, will get to this point in particular later on)
now as an Egyptian citizen I'm more than willing to accept the above suspects provided the government comes out with evidence to prove that indeed these guys have anything to do with the attacks carried out by daesh who are now fighting under the flag of ISIS Sinai branch. Hamas (an off shooter branch of the MB) is accused of providing training and arms to these militants, very well where is the intelligence material that supports such a claim? I ask this well because Egypt has always claimed the weapons and fighters sneak into Egypt via the god damned tunnels that breach into the Sinai desert that borders Gaza and Egyptian rafah (note: rafah is almost removed from existence in order to form a buffer zone between the Egyptian border and Gaza in an attempt to avoid such transfer) ironically the army a while ago claimed they have destroyed at least 95% of the above mentioned tunnels. I have another question, if Hamas is indeed a terrorist organization why do many of its top heads have A- Egyptian passports B why are they allowed to not only visit Cairo but are allowed to own property like residential houses? (even if some of this happened during morsy's period, why weren't they revoked after morsy pissed off??) instead Al kassam brigade got a terrorist group verdict by the Egyptian courts without any one what so ever coming out to the people and saying yes they did this and this, they supplied this and this, and here is the proof people of Egypt and so we declare war on these SOB's but instead not a single word was said and the dirty business was left for the media to finish off. you have analysts who come out and come up with scenario's worthy of Hollywood action movies!! NOTE: I can't stand hamas, but I firmly believe Egypt is the biggest state in the middle east and in all honesty creating a monster out of Hamas is just humiliating to my country and belittling people's minds!!
turkey and Qatar two countries who don't need any introductions, and as much as I despise the role they play I have a pragmatic view of their role!! the initial suspect is dying to revive the past and play a role in the region it once had under its ceiling before the inevitable collapse, and after being rejected membership in the EU the middle east remains the preferred region of influence for turkey. once again I feel my fellow Egyptian's ( I'm guilty of that too) shove emotion into the equation and think of international politics the same way they think of family members and relations and so they can't accept that all of this is not personal but it is a battle of different interests that collide!! the question should be ok turkey is looking out for its interests what is Egypt's foreign policy to counter this???
Qatar, perhaps the most hated nation in the Arab world at the moment but I have to admit they know what they want and they play their cards right. Qatar wants to play a role in the region, despite its tiny size its wrestling for influence with the big dogs in the region and they have no problems what so ever joining the devil to get that role. it's no secret Qatar has ties with Israel making it the only gulf state with such ties and without the need for any peace treaty or what not. the Qatari's are home to Aljazeera who is used by the Qatari's as you would use a pit bull on steroids (if the Egyptian media was not so unprofessional may be just may be people wouldn't have paid attention to Aljazeera food for thought). once again this is the logical result for Egypt's deteriorated foreign policy that has seen Egypt's role in the region minimized to such an extent it was only fair for the Qatari's to pounce on the opportunity so yes Egypt has its self to blame for that, and to this minute I see no change instead we are playing second fiddle to the Saudi's in the region (I bet Nasser and Sadat are rolling in their grave!!) speaking of the Saudi's I mentioned many pages back that morsy and the MB in particular were trying to drag Egypt into the Sunni vs. shiaa conflict, I now wonder which side or which role will Egypt play.
in my personal opinion if Egypt wishes to play a role and exert influence it should open communication channels with Iran. it is true Egypt's national security starts from the gulf states which in return makes a lot more sense Egypt engages with Iran and why not play a mediator role between the two opposing points of views.
I personally feel the regime is still not able to comprehend that may be just many be if we treat the locals at Sinai as first class citizens instead of the way we do at the moment and for the past 40 decades things would change and it wouldn't be the hot bed for terrorists the way it is, may be if much needed development is brought specially to the northern side of Sinai people wouldn't take the terrorists side in the conflict due to disparity. It evades my mind as to why the Egyptians don't create a task force with Hamas that regulate the openings to cancel out the need for tunnels (if tunnels show up despite this then no one can blame Egypt for any reaction it chooses to take) but instead we insist on not seeing the core problem and we choose to be where we are. i feel Egypt is intentionally throwing away cards it can use to its favor.
p.s by the time you read this, Peter greste one of four al jazeerah journalists is released while his egyptain colleagues are still in prison with no imminent release on the horizon.... a lovely message to send out to the people you are trying to have on your side while you combat terrorists who use this as their bread and butter to recruit people who have lost faith in their own country.
sorry for dragging on
