no i dont know much, but i am confident you know even less, any other questions?
Buy on AliExpress.com
Does God exist? (William Lane Craig vs Peter Atkins debate) (40 Viewers)
- Thread starter Dinsdale
- Start date
Buy on AliExpress.com
no my post is actually useful as not only did it show the uselessness of your "totally agree" but reconfirmed your bland unimaginative and nauseatingly repetitive replies. It's actually so bad it made miss your recycled overused to death swag 
joke
---------- Post added 02.07.2012 at 18:39 ----------
where does it not? show me where it promotes certainty.
joke---------- Post added 02.07.2012 at 18:39 ----------
where does it not? show me where it promotes certainty.
no my post is actually useful as not only did it show the uselessness of your "totally agree" but reconfirmed your bland unimaginative and nauseatingly repetitive replies. It's actually so bad it made miss your recycled overused to death swag joke
joke
I used to enjoy reading your posts here. Now you just don't make any sense, and you really don't contribute anything here. What happened to you, man?
With the data provided by a meta analysis you could use a funnel plot to eradicate/identify issues with (publication and other) forms of bias.
Anyway this is beside the point. If science knew everything - it would stop, and finding the correct (99.99%) answer on the first try is impossible, thats why its
Hypothesis <-> test <-> Prove? <-> Defend/Peer Review
Not
Hypothesis -> test -> Prove? yes = win, no = give up.
---------- Post added 03.07.2012 at 00:58 ----------
Anyway this is beside the point. If science knew everything - it would stop, and finding the correct (99.99%) answer on the first try is impossible, thats why its
Hypothesis <-> test <-> Prove? <-> Defend/Peer Review
Not
Hypothesis -> test -> Prove? yes = win, no = give up.
---------- Post added 03.07.2012 at 00:58 ----------
If you made sense, then I would understand you. But you just aren't. Maybe it's the way in which you are trying to put your points across. It just seems too convoluted and never to the point. It may make sense to you, but you're not doing a good job of putting your point across. I actually understand some of AC's arguments better than yours. That's how bad your posts seem these days.
eradicating bias(as if that is possible) means certainty in results now? and stop mudding the waters, you said with scientific method we get definite answers.
also the 2 of you please spare me the whole you used to be cool, at the very least you should know 1. i could care less 2. you have yet to say anything remotely compelling
also the 2 of you please spare me the whole you used to be cool, at the very least you should know 1. i could care less 2. you have yet to say anything remotely compelling
I didn't say you used to be cool, I agreed that I used to enjoy your company. You have failed to ever say anything to me remotely compelling and you constant berating of your perception of my intelligence is boring and doesn't have affect on me given that I have been awarded a scholarship, degree and after submitting my research will have another and when i have funding I will be researching & reading for a PhD....its just the fucking internet dude.
Did you guys hear that FIFA is in a pickle because the Iran women's NT wants to play at the Olympics but only if they can use hijabs. So now FIFA wants to let them play and they're trying to come up with some excuse. 
http://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article...ijab_1728063_3232.html?xtmc=fifa_hijab&xtcr=1
http://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article...ijab_1728063_3232.html?xtmc=fifa_hijab&xtcr=1
