Does God exist? (William Lane Craig vs Peter Atkins debate) (8 Viewers)

[DelpieroForLife]

I'm not insinuating that mathematics should be done with, just that it doesn't provide a full explanation in and of itself. Scientism reduces everything to simple numbers.

You have to give credit to mathematics as without it you won't be able to communicate with me and tell me how it can't explain the world.

BTW being unable to provide full explanation TODAY doesn't discard mathematics as a way to explain the world, our entire knowledge about universe was gained through science and mathematics, I can't believe you might possibly deny that.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Linebreak]

You have to give credit to mathematics as without it you won't be able to communicate with me and tell me how it can't explain the world.

BTW being unable to provide full explanation TODAY doesn't discard mathematics as a way to explain the world, our entire knowledge about universe was gained through science and mathematics, I can't believe you might possibly deny that.

I'm not saying mathematics should be thrown out the window. I am saying in and of itself, mathematics (Scientism) fails to completely explain everything, it's only a flash-light in a dark room, it doesn't give you the full picture.

 

[DelpieroForLife]

I'm not saying mathematics should be thrown out the window. I am saying in and of itself, mathematics (Scientism) fails to completely explain everything, it's only a flash-light in a dark room, it doesn't give you the full picture.

And religion does?

Mathematics and Science are a progressive process, compare what we know today to what we knew few hundred of year ago and again, being unable to explain the full picture TODAY shouldn't make us discard science as our method to explain universe and most importantly shouldn't make us believe supernatural explanations just because we can't explain everything today.

 

[Martin]

I'm not saying mathematics should be thrown out the window. I am saying in and of itself, mathematics (Scientism) fails to completely explain everything, it's only a flash-light in a dark room, it doesn't give you the full picture.

And religion does? Very well, explain to us how atoms came to exist. God created them? Good, but that's not what I asked for. Tell me how he created them. What did he actually do? What were the raw materials?

Religion explains nothing. In fact, it refuses to explain anything.

So I guess we're back to science, eh?

 

[DelpieroForLife]

And religion does?

Mathematics and Science are a progressive process, compare what we know today to what we knew few hundred of year ago and again, being unable to explain the full picture TODAY shouldn't make us discard science as our method to explain universe and most importantly shouldn't make us believe supernatural explanations just because we can't explain everything today.

And religion does? Very well, explain to us how atoms came to exist. God created them? Good, but that's not what I asked for. Tell me how he created them. What did he actually do? What were the raw materials?

Religion explains nothing. In fact, it refuses to explain anything.

So I guess we're back to science, eh?

Have you read my post before you post

 

[Martin]

Have you read my post before you post

Yes, but you missed the point too. "shouldn't make us believe supernatural explanations" is precisely where the misunderstanding lies. There are no supernatural explanations, there are only promises of supernatural explanations.

 

[DelpieroForLife]

Yes, but you missed the point too. "shouldn't make us believe supernatural explanations" is precisely where the misunderstanding lies. There are no supernatural explanations, there are only promises of supernatural explanations.

This is why I said believe supernatural explination as we are lacking any sort of evidence.

 

[Martin]

Missed the point again. Nevermind, man

 

[DelpieroForLife]

Missed the point again. Nevermind, man

I actually understand your points and your questions of "how he created them. What did he actually do? What were the raw materials?" but religion will tell you that he is the creator who can create anything by just naming the thing he wants to create.

The real questions to be raised from the answer "God created them" is ""Who created God?" or "How did God comes into existence" or "Why did he created the universe?".

 

[Martin]

I actually understand your points and your questions of "how he created them. What did he actually do? What were the raw materials?" but religion will tell you that he is the creator who can create anything by just naming the thing he wants to create.

Right, and that's not an explanation. So we should stop it right there and say that. "Someone did something in some way" is not an explanation in any sense of the word.

 

[DelpieroForLife]

Right, and that's not an explanation. So we should stop it right there and say that. "Someone did something in some way" is not an explanation in any sense of the word.

I'm more into answering the why and not the how.

 

[Trequartista]

Who here believes that Mt Rushmore was created over millions of years of erosion and just happened to end up perfectly resembling, what would have been at the time, four future US presidents?

Does anyone here think that it would be crazy to believe such a theory?

This statement is even more hilarious than the one on your friend's brain

Keep the good work going.

 

[Nzoric]

I'm more into answering the why and not the how.

Why are you under the impression that there is a "Why" ?

I told you, hilarious statement

 

[DelpieroForLife]

Why are you under the impression that there is a "Why" ?

I told you, hilarious statement

Answering the "Why?" doesn't necessarily mean that it was designed or there was a smart entity behind it.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

Why did god create us? If this omniscient being KNEW EVERYTHING, then why create us? What possible purpose do we serve? And what kind if a purpose is it that an omnipotent creature like him cannot fulfil himself?

 

[ALC]

Who here believes that Mt Rushmore was created over millions of years of erosion and just happened to end up perfectly resembling, what would have been at the time, four future US presidents?

Does anyone here think that it would be crazy to believe such a theory?

The point of relevance is as follows:

Is it possible that over the period of millions of years, that erosion could have cause something similar to Mt Rushmore? Carved out human faces of real human beings?

:wth:

You have to give credit to mathematics as without it you won't be able to communicate with me and tell me how it can't explain the world.

BTW being unable to provide full explanation TODAY doesn't discard mathematics as a way to explain the world, our entire knowledge about universe was gained through science and mathematics, I can't believe you might possibly deny that.

He thinks you hook your ponytail up to the your computer and it works, just like in Avatar.

 

[DelpieroForLife]

He thinks you hook your ponytail up to the your computer and it works, just like in Avatar.

The quote in my signature is unbelievable, how one can be that brain washed?

 

[Nzoric]

Scientism HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

[Nzoric]

Answering the "Why?" doesn't necessarily mean that it was designed or there was a smart entity behind it.

But if there is a why, there is certainly basis for a discussion of intelligent design. If there is a why, then we are purposefully created by something. And my question stands, what gives people the impression that there is a "why". Just reading the news for 30 minutes gives you an idea of how chaotic and random this place is. There, no mathematics, no higher philosophy or anything, simple observation.
I wonder if theists will write that off too as scientism, since it's an empirical way of viewing things?

 

[Linebreak]

Why did god create us? If this omniscient being KNEW EVERYTHING, then why create us? What possible purpose do we serve? And what kind if a purpose is it that an omnipotent creature like him cannot fulfil himself?

The point is he created us and we're here, responsible for our actions.