Does God exist? (William Lane Craig vs Peter Atkins debate) (26 Viewers)

Well, did...

  • Man make God?

  • God make Man?


Results are only viewable after voting.
Apr 15, 2006
56,640
It seems you are more angry with what you don't undestand, not that you can't comunicate with it.
You can't expect me to understand something that is illogical to me. I've heard arguments from both sides, but I find the arguments from the other side easier to understand. Why should I be angry at that?

People do confirm their belief in god even though outside may (people like you) say otherwise.
What kind of people though? Christians will confirm their belief in Christ, Hindus will confirm their belief in one of several Hindu deities, Sikhs will confirm their belief in Waheguru. Which one am I supposed to believe?
 

AndreaCristiano

Nato, Vive, e muore Italiano
Jun 9, 2011
19,126
What do you think about drugs and their place in your religion? I have a friend who is sort of die hard protestant, he wouldn't be making these kind of statements, he would be drugs are bad and anything under influence of them can be discarded. I'm just curious why would you side with the drug expirience and it's validity?
I do believe that drugs may strip inhibitions and open up gateways per se. A person on a drug powerful enough to remove those inhibitions may allow that person ton experience something which he normally would be predisposed to not allow himself to experience
 

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
That's my point. So how can they be discounted just because it wasn't shared. Hallucinations have brought forth a lot of the worlds best art and even some important discoveries. So because one user didn't experience the same then it can not be a discounted experience.
Without independent verification it's not science. Just hearsay. In court they don't admit this either.
 

AndreaCristiano

Nato, Vive, e muore Italiano
Jun 9, 2011
19,126
You can't expect me to understand something that is illogical to me. I've heard arguments from both sides, but I find the arguments from the other side easier to understand. Why should I be angry at that?



What kind of people though? Christians will confirm their belief in Christ, Hindus will confirm their belief in one of several Hindu deities, Sikhs will confirm their belief in Waheguru. Which one am I supposed to believe?
In the end that is just semantics. The one God creator of all the essence if you will stripped away from religious dogma and ideas of what or who that God is is always constant. God is all and God is one
 

Raz

Senior Member
Nov 20, 2005
12,218
What kind of people though? Christians will confirm their belief in Christ, Hindus will confirm their belief in one of several Hindu deities, Sikhs will confirm their belief in Waheguru. Which one am I supposed to believe?
I find this argument the most boring. God is god, and mostly we get the name of god from where we are born, but that doesn't change the fact that they all believe in god.
 
Apr 15, 2006
56,640
In the end that is just semantics. The one God creator of all the essence if you will stripped away from religious dogma and ideas of what or who that God is is always constant. God is all and God is one
I've said time and again that if all these gods embody just 1 god, then it leads to a lot of contradictory claims in various scriptures. It creates more confusion as to the nature of god. This explanation is something I come across a lot when speaking with Hindus. But they fail to go into details that are contradictory within different religions. It's not a good explanation. Period.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 26)