Davide Lanzafame (7 Viewers)

[Vinman]

What exactly was he supposed to do? We made a deal with Parma to loan them Lanza for the season. All he could do was see if Parma would be willing to change this deal. It was always unlikely that they would be.

if Moggi was still here, he would have got him back, and got some money out of them as well :eyebrows:

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[YasoR17]

boohoo:sleepy:

 

[bianconeri1897]

if Moggi was still here, he would have got him back, and got some money out of them as well :eyebrows:

Yeah damn sure! He would have got Guus+Afellay too

 

[The Curr]

if Moggi was still here, he would have got him back, and got some money out of them as well :eyebrows:

And then next season we'd be playing AlbinoLeffe instead of Inter.

 

[bianconeri1897]

Long live the KING! L.M

 

[mondo1]

for lanzafame staying in parma is th ebest he can do.
he would be getting some playing time here for the next 3 weeks maybe.
and then he would be sitting on the bench right next to gio

 

[Alen]

Lanzafame is co-owned by Juventus and Palermo. It was part of the Amauri to Juve deal, and the co-ownership was prolonged to another year in June 2009, with Juve giving Palermo the right to have the player in 2009/2010 and do whatever they want with him.

When Lanzafame was loaned to Parma in July 2009, he was loaned there by Palermo, not by Juve. Parma actually paid some money to Palermo for the loan.

If we want to take him back this year, we'd need to pay Parma for the loan, and i'm not sure but we might even need Palermo to allow us take the player on loan.

And when you think about it, it's really stupid to pay for the loan of a player you co-own.
Our board did nothing else but put themselves in a pretty embarrassing situation. They probably tried to get Lanzafame on loan for free, but in the end all they achieved was to look stupid for trying to get on loan a player they co-own.

 

[Bjerknes]

Lanzafame is co-owned by Juventus and Palermo. It was part of the Amauri to Juve deal, and the co-ownership was prolonged to another year in June 2009, with Juve giving Palermo the right to have the player in 2009/2010 and do whatever they want with him.

When Lanzafame was loaned to Parma in July 2009, he was loaned there by Palermo, not by Juve. Parma actually paid some money to Palermo for the loan.

If we want to take him back this year, we'd need to pay Parma for the loan, and i'm not sure but we might even need Palermo to allow us take the player on loan.

And when you think about it, it's really stupid to pay for the loan of a player you co-own.
Our board did nothing else but put themselves in a pretty embarrassing situation. They probably tried to get Lanzafame on loan for free, but in the end all they achieved was to look stupid for trying to get on loan a player they co-own.

Bravo, Board of DirecTARDS.

Loans and co-owns are so fun.

 

[Hust]

Bravo, Board of DirecTARDS.

Loans and co-owns are so fun.

 

[Hydde]

Definitely loans and etc are not the forte of our BoD....


Infact, i dont know what their forte is...

 

[v1rtu4l]

if Moggi was still here, he would have got him back, and got some money out of them as well :eyebrows:

and a corpse in a black bag too ... but parma would need to get a new technical director then

 

[only-juve]

Lanzafame is co-owned by Juventus and Palermo. It was part of the Amauri to Juve deal, and the co-ownership was prolonged to another year in June 2009, with Juve giving Palermo the right to have the player in 2009/2010 and do whatever they want with him.

When Lanzafame was loaned to Parma in July 2009, he was loaned there by Palermo, not by Juve. Parma actually paid some money to Palermo for the loan.

If we want to take him back this year, we'd need to pay Parma for the loan, and i'm not sure but we might even need Palermo to allow us take the player on loan.

And when you think about it, it's really stupid to pay for the loan of a player you co-own.
Our board did nothing else but put themselves in a pretty embarrassing situation. They probably tried to get Lanzafame on loan for free, but in the end all they achieved was to look stupid for trying to get on loan a player they co-own.

They never stop suprising us, What a great management running this club

 

[BillyG]

Lanzafame is co-owned by Juventus and Palermo. It was part of the Amauri to Juve deal, and the co-ownership was prolonged to another year in June 2009, with Juve giving Palermo the right to have the player in 2009/2010 and do whatever they want with him.

When Lanzafame was loaned to Parma in July 2009, he was loaned there by Palermo, not by Juve. Parma actually paid some money to Palermo for the loan.

If we want to take him back this year, we'd need to pay Parma for the loan, and i'm not sure but we might even need Palermo to allow us take the player on loan.

And when you think about it, it's really stupid to pay for the loan of a player you co-own.
Our board did nothing else but put themselves in a pretty embarrassing situation. They probably tried to get Lanzafame on loan for free, but in the end all they achieved was to look stupid for trying to get on loan a player they co-own.

u just have to love the brilliance of secco. it's so stupid all i can do is laugh

 

[Martin]

Lanzafame is co-owned by Juventus and Palermo. It was part of the Amauri to Juve deal, and the co-ownership was prolonged to another year in June 2009, with Juve giving Palermo the right to have the player in 2009/2010 and do whatever they want with him.

When Lanzafame was loaned to Parma in July 2009, he was loaned there by Palermo, not by Juve. Parma actually paid some money to Palermo for the loan.

If we want to take him back this year, we'd need to pay Parma for the loan, and i'm not sure but we might even need Palermo to allow us take the player on loan.

And when you think about it, it's really stupid to pay for the loan of a player you co-own.
Our board did nothing else but put themselves in a pretty embarrassing situation. They probably tried to get Lanzafame on loan for free, but in the end all they achieved was to look stupid for trying to get on loan a player they co-own.

Hey it was worth it, we have Amauriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii arty:

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

Good decision, Lanza. Only naive youngsters come Juve, and then they quickly learn... Except Giovinco. What a stubborn boy.

 

[Nicholas]

He has not impressed me with Parma to be honest. Rather he stay there.

 

[Osman]

Same here, we dont need him, and only wanted him back because of injuries. But either way, pretty lame way of doing things if all Alen said is true, pretty embarrassing.

 

[BillyG]

it still shows how stupid the whole co-ownership BS is! It really does need to be eradicated as it causes to many complications when dealing with such players & clubs involved.

 

[Nicholas]

Same here, we dont need him, and only wanted him back because of injuries. But either way, pretty lame way of doing things if all Alen said is true, pretty embarrassing.

It is, but the way people are reacting here you think we'd let go of Messi. Meh he is an average striker at best.

 

[Osman]

He is a winger(wingforward), and dont want him in Juve, not good enough except as reserve player. And yeah totally right doesnt deserve this fuss at all. But typical melodrama as usual.