Davide Lanzafame (18 Viewers)

[Dostoevsky]

This morning

Lanzafame looks forward to return

Now

Lanzafame wanted to stay, it's why deal didn't happen

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Luca]

haha, he must have learned of















The project

 

[Nicholas]

He is a winger(wingforward), and dont want him in Juve, not good enough except as reserve player. And yeah totally right doesnt deserve this fuss at all. But typical melodrama as usual.

To try and dig at the management. I say give Immobile a chance next game.

 

[BIG DADDY!!!]

He is a winger(wingforward), and dont want him in Juve, not good enough except as reserve player. And yeah totally right doesnt deserve this fuss at all. But typical melodrama as usual.

He would provide much needed width though.

He can play in a many formations which will give us much better tactical options!

I was all for this transfer not for the player himself but for from a tactical point of view.

I just want to see changes be it Iago, Rossi or My Cousin Vinny!

 

[Osman]

I understand that, that is the same as I said few pages back, we need a winger option, having non right now, so even if not quality one, better then nothing. But if we cant get him, you wont hear me expressing any regret or blasting the board over it, he is a fringe player at best. And would only of use the few weeks there is left til Camo/Gio get back, not to mention will be shipped back out/sold in usmmer.

 

[Bjerknes]

it still shows how stupid the whole co-ownership BS is! It really does need to be eradicated as it causes to many complications when dealing with such players & clubs involved.

Indeed it does. Quite silly stuff, as usual.

 

[The Curr]

The thing that strikes me about co-ownerships is that Juve never seem to gain anything from them. We never get the co-owned player back as a better, more developed player.

 

[BIG DADDY!!!]

Good point Curr and what happened to the Foggia rumours?

 

[Osman]

Co-owned players are generally players we want to give rid of (except for rare few cases), but that selling them outright isnt as doable because the other club isnt as interested, and would get low fee. So you sell half to see how things turn out and if you can sell for profit with the 2nd half.

 

[The Curr]

Co-owned players are generally players we want to give rid of (except for rare few cases), but that selling them outright isnt as doable because the other club isnt as interested, and would get low fee. So you sell half to see how things turn out and if you can sell for profit with the 2nd half.

That's fair enough but it's sort of wasteful too. We'd be better off either doing everything we can to sell 100% of the player or keep him and give him a chance.

 

[swag]

Chimenti should just suit up. He'd do better than Amauri in front of the other team's goal these days.

 

[Mark]

Lately Amauri's been doing well..........at the back.

 

[Mark]

This morning

Lanzafame looks forward to return

Now

Lanzafame wanted to stay, it's why deal didn't happen

They were torturing him. It's clear the guy was gonna run over here if he had the chance.

 

[Joe]

Why did the Lanzafame deal collapse?

 

[Hydde]

also, chiumento is the new del piero

What happened to this guy after all?.

Was such a massive flop¿ that he dissapeared?

 

[Salvo]

this guy lol?

umm hopefully we brought back iago.
isnt palladingo better than this guy anyway?

 

[Juve_fanatic]

What i cant understand is why is there a thread about this guy in "Player discussion"?? Shouldnt it be in "Transfer discussion"??

 

[sebastian]

What i cant understand is why is there a thread about this guy in "Player discussion"?? Shouldnt it be in "Transfer discussion"??

because he is a juve (and palermo) owned player

 

[Hust]

We should get at least 4m from him this summer. Just cut our losses now.

 

[JCK]

Lanzafame >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amauri
Crespo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amauri