David Trezeguet (58 Viewers)
- Thread starter HelterSkelter
- Start date
-Rep.He doesn't really. Look at the live comments, look at the post match ratings. Almost everyone agreed that he was a catastrophe today. Completely useless.
He won't be getting as much shit as players like Molinaro or Poulsen if he plays as shitty as them, but his legendary status gives him that. When Gigi was playing bad last year, when Nedved played bad and when Del Piero played bad, only a small number of idiots kept giving them shit 24/7. It's the same in Trez's case. Just that this time you're in the small number of idiots, while in Buffon's or DP's case you were feeling insulted of what the small number of idiots had to say about Gigi and Alex.
He won't be getting as much shit as players like Molinaro or Poulsen if he plays as shitty as them, but his legendary status gives him that. When Gigi was playing bad last year, when Nedved played bad and when Del Piero played bad, only a small number of idiots kept giving them shit 24/7. It's the same in Trez's case. Just that this time you're in the small number of idiots, while in Buffon's or DP's case you were feeling insulted of what the small number of idiots had to say about Gigi and Alex.
Eℓvin;2191482 said:
you're not compiling a youtube clip on the most beautiful goals.
Right now he's playing the same way he always did, just that there is almost no service for him.
He's even forced to do more, as track back, hold the ball and similar shit, which he's bad at.
But in the past he was never forced to do that and all he had to do was to wait in the box and score.
He got service back then, he doesn't now.
So yeah, I guess you could say that he's a liability because without the service he's useless and it's hurting us. But if you think about it you'll see that the problem is not in Trez and even without him there won't be any service and we'll suffer, although we'll be a bit more dangerous.
So what is better, to play without Trez and without service, without Trez and with service or with Trez and with service?
I'll choose the third option and i'll try to improve other parts of the team and make sure there will be service for the strikers. If that is achieved, then i'll always pick Trez in front of the other strikers to be the guy in our attack and try to finish those balls in the box.
He's even forced to do more, as track back, hold the ball and similar shit, which he's bad at.
But in the past he was never forced to do that and all he had to do was to wait in the box and score.
He got service back then, he doesn't now.
So yeah, I guess you could say that he's a liability because without the service he's useless and it's hurting us. But if you think about it you'll see that the problem is not in Trez and even without him there won't be any service and we'll suffer, although we'll be a bit more dangerous.
So what is better, to play without Trez and without service, without Trez and with service or with Trez and with service?
I'll choose the third option and i'll try to improve other parts of the team and make sure there will be service for the strikers. If that is achieved, then i'll always pick Trez in front of the other strikers to be the guy in our attack and try to finish those balls in the box.
Ok, let's take Diego's crosses from FKs for instance, almost always somewhat good service, right? Before Trez would be there to head it at least once during the game. Now everybody is there... except Trez. That's what I'm saying, he is not dangerous anymore, EVER. I haven't seen him being dangerous for the past 2 years. I don't have a problem with his style so many of you bring up, never have. But now nothing is good for him unless it's an open net. That's what my problem is...