Damien Comolli - General manager (12 Viewers)

[DanielSz]

Luiz was a less than zero last season, he actually cost juve games and had no positive impact in any game that i remember. dumping him permanently was a miracle.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[GarfielD]

Romano
Comolli has set a standard that started with Weah- Marseille, Juve didnt budge an inch, they got what they wanted. This is Comolli’s way. The rule is either you pay what Juve want or the player stays. The line is clear.

Dude sold Weah, A. Costa, Mbangula and Savona for 50m combined. I call it terrible business.

 

[DeviAngel]

 

[Bjerknes]

Says the guy selling our academy players for pittance.

Just shut the fuck up already.

 

[DeviAngel]

 

[JuveJay]

Sounds like we're broke.

 

[The Quazis]

But we needed 40 mil to avoid a capital loss. Only the loan with option saved us


Gesendet von iPhone mit Tapatalk

Capital gain or loss on a single player is not that important. What's important is your final financial result. Minusvalenza on a sale of a player is no different than any other cost that hits the profit and loss statement. Be it another player's wage or security services on the stadium.

 

[iosono.bianconero]

We can say bye bye to kolo muani, another year of vlahovic will be such a pain in the ass. But we deserve it, after such a painfull mercato and past 5 seasons.

I can see Vlahovic going to inter merda for 0€ next year while they'll sell Thuram for 70 milion to some premier league team. Its the Marotta way after all.

We will be trying to buy hojlund or some other bum like Milan is trying to sign a striker this year while Kolo Muani will be playing for Newcastle or some other premierleauge team.

All in all banter continues forsure, comolli or coboli or giuntoli its all the same at this point. We are fucked.

 

[Robee]

Dude sold Weah, A. Costa, Mbangula and Savona for 50m combined. I call it terrible business.

Would you be pleased if we had spent 50m this mercato and bought those 4 ?

 

[Badass J Elkann]

Would you be pleased if we had spent 50m this mercato and bought those 4 ?

Thats not the right way of looking at it. Nobody bought all 4 together. The capital gains on those 4 is not even close to 50 mill either.

 

[Robee]

Thats not the right way of looking at it. Nobody bought all 4 together. The capital gains on those 4 is not even close to 50 mill either.

It was a yes or no question but you may add a reason too. Don't divert. It's a very good way of looking at it from another perspective and you'd see why if you try and answer it. We did sell all 4, so buying all 4 would be reverting it.

 

[Badass J Elkann]

It was a yes or no question but you may add a reason too. Don't divert. It's a very good way of looking at it from another perspective and you'd see why if you try and answer it. We did sell all 4, so buying all 4 would be reverting it.

It's an irrelevant question.

Like I said nobody paid 50 mill for the 4 together, secondly and in particular we traded Alberto Costa for Joao Mario, thirdly what was our plus valenza in all the deals combined? trust me it is closer to about 25 mill if anything.

 

[Bianconero_Aus]

After Comolli’s words, it’s mercato chiuso. And give. How bad our financial outlook is in terms of FFP rules, looks like next seasons summer mercato will (somehow) be even worse than this years lol.

The banter era just keeps on getting better.

 

[Robee]

It's an irrelevant question.

Like I said nobody paid 50 mill for the 4 together, secondly and in particular we traded Alberto Costa for Joao Mario, thirdly what was our plus valenza in all the deals combined? trust me it is closer to about 25 mill if anything.

But we sold all 4. Reverting it would be buying them all 4 for the same money. So it has literally nothing to do with someone else buying them all 4. Everything with us keeping them / buying them back instead of / for that money 'tho. Very relevant to see whether you like the value for that money or not. Look at it from the other side instead of simply ignoring it and shouting things.

So yes or no. You may add losing Joao Mario too.

I imagine our plusvalenza to be pretty high on all of them except for Costa.

 

[Turk_Bianconero]

this clown is juggling even worse than cuntoli.

 

[Badass J Elkann]

But we sold all 4. Reverting it would be buying them all 4 for the same money. So it has literally norhing to do with someone else buying them all 4.

Our books does not read +50 mill though does it? Alberto Costa would not have happened without taking Joao Mario as the counter part so there's his value to our net costing to take into account. Again you literally fail to understand we did not in any way shape of form receive 50 mill when you take the cost behind each of the operations into account

 

[GordoDeCentral]

this clown is juggling even worse than cuntoli.

BUT at least he's NOT stealing!

 

[Bjerknes]

Sounds like we're broke.

As long as it's on Cumolli's terms that we're broke.

 

[GordoDeCentral]

Our books does not read +50 mill though does it? Alberto Costa would not have happened without taking Joao Mario as the counter part so there's his value to our net costing to take into account. Again you literally fail to understand we did not in any way shape of form receive 50 mill when you take the cost behind each of the operations into account

It doesn't work like that

 

[Robee]

Our books does not read +50 mill though does it? Alberto Costa would not have happened without taking Joao Mario as the counter part so there's his value to our net costing to take into account. Again you literally fail to understand we did not in any way shape of form receive 50 mill when you take the cost behind each of the operations into account

Our bank accounts do read +50 mil while there are different types of accounting sheets being formed and some of them do too... Not just the good old plusvalenza but also cash flow etc... Didn't you have some businesses? Then you should know this stuff...

So final time; yes or no? And again you may add your reasons.