Cristiano Ronaldo (227 Viewers)

Mokku

Senior Member
Apr 17, 2019
2,723
He's still under contract so he'll need to negotiate an exit with us. If PSG and United are his only options then we can squeeze them for cash or negotiate with good players. Pogba, Veratti, Marquinhos should be what we demand because we'd be giving away 30 goals per season and clutch match winner.
 

Gep

The Guv'nor
Jun 12, 2005
16,493
He's still under contract so he'll need to negotiate an exit with us. If PSG and United are his only options then we can squeeze them for cash or negotiate with good players. Pogba, Veratti, Marquinhos should be what we demand because we'd be giving away 30 goals per season and clutch match winner.
A Marquinhos DeLigt partnership would be heaven for me.
 

K.O.

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2005
13,883

rainhard

Senior Member
May 5, 2004
4,365
We will not have this such discussion if 3 years ago we bought Hakimi, Haaland and Bruno Fernandes

Their recent transfer fee
Hakimi 45M (2020)
Haaland 20M (Jan 2020)
Bruno Fernandes 55M (Jan 2020)

Total 120 M transfer fee with salary total for 3 of them lower than 31M
I solely believe we can get discount from that amount of money if those transfer happen in 2018 and with lower amount of wages too

And voila 3 years latter Hakimi 50M value, Bruno Fernandes 90M value, Haaland 110M total =240M value

While CR7 i dont think any club will take him even if we give him for free, no one will pay his salary with his current age (Washed up)
 

ALC

Ohaulick
Oct 28, 2010
46,540
We will not have this such discussion if 3 years ago we bought Hakimi, Haaland and Bruno Fernandes

Their recent transfer fee
Hakimi 45M (2020)
Haaland 20M (Jan 2020)
Bruno Fernandes 55M (Jan 2020)

Total 120 M transfer fee with salary total for 3 of them lower than 31M
I solely believe we can get discount from that amount of money if those transfer happen in 2018 and with lower amount of wages too

And voila 3 years latter Hakimi 50M value, Bruno Fernandes 90M value, Haaland 110M total =240M value

While CR7 i dont think any club will take him even if we give him for free, no one will pay his salary with his current age (Washed up)
as they say, hindsight is 20/20

I think Haaland was clearly a world class player when Dortmund got him but he chose Dortmund because he wanted to, other teams had higher offers declined. And we got ronaldo because he was a proven player in champions league, not because of his potential. So comparing apples to oranges
 

zizinho

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2013
51,816
as they say, hindsight is 20/20

I think Haaland was clearly a world class player when Dortmund got him but he chose Dortmund because he wanted to, other teams had higher offers declined. And we got ronaldo because he was a proven player in champions league, not because of his potential. So comparing apples to oranges
If he chose Leipzig, they might have won the double this season. Bayern lost Lewa at the key part of the season and during that time RBL bottled some great chances to catch them. With Haaland maybe they pull it off. Plus both clubs owned by RB, would have been a easy transaction...

But I think he chose Dortmund for the clause, he's gonna be wanted by every single top club next summer still, and 70M is pocket change for all of them. I'm not sure Leipzig would have put a clause so Raiola took him to BVB
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 197)