Criscito 100% Juve (3 Viewers)

[Alfio_87]

we just paid 5 mil euros for half of him we paid 10 mill for canna u do the math

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[RAMI-N]

The whole deal sucks
and it seems that Secco did mess in this deal

 

[Vinman]

well, i saw him a few times and i was impressed but not that impressed. Its alot of many for young criscito.
But I dont mind putting up that kind of money for a good player and there is alot of potential in the kid.

However my problem is with Secco, now our player could be helping another team challenge us for promotion. WHY is that? why isnt he here now or even in freaking Verona or Siena on loan.

Genoa r our direct opponents for promotion, and hes playing for them.

damn right...bring him back, we need him NOW !!!!!:ferocious

 

[Marc]

I think Criscito is overrated.

 

[V]

I think Criscito is overrated.

I think you are correct.

 

[Juventinoo]

Guys, i think some one did write a complete report about Criscito before he came yesterday, i think the member Jun-Hide, Chinese man...can any one give me the link ...

 

[Philipp00]

That`s a lot of money for such a young player. I don`t think that 100% of his rights are worth 15 millions. I hope he is good and will improve our defence.

 

[zizoufan]

PPl here are always in a hurry ! wait do u know more than secco or the other professional of the game ?? Please take them out and replace them please

 

[flieeeekke]

damn right...bring him back, we need him NOW !!!!!:ferocious

and what makes you think genoa would sell him?

anyway, imo its a great deal. best young italian defender and 5m aint that much.

 

[vletrmx]

and what makes you think genoa would sell him?

anyway, imo its a great deal. best young italian defender and 5m aint that much.

kaip pirstu i aki

 

[Tobias]

I saw him play when he made is debut for the under 21 came on as a sub and i saw couple of genoa games, he also played well when he played against us. He has the potential to be great but i think we paid too much for a player we had 50% ownership plus 2 players. Hopefuly his worth it in the long run!

 

[malducato1]

Our management wouldn't throw that kind of money at a youngster if he was utter crap. Granted we paid hefty to get a average defender like boum boum but at that time our options where limited and he was willing to play in B.

The office must have seen something they like in this kid and decided to bring him to Juve for good. He is only 20 years old and for a defender that is a baby the more time he plays he will just keep getting better. It would be great in a couple of years to see this kid starting with Chiellini as our defense of the future.

 

[Lion]

I love how some you guys decided that this kid is not worth it, when most of you haven't seen him play. This kid was probably sccouted by guys like Ferrara. If the managment thinks he's good, then he must be good. My point is that we should not pass judgement until we see him play next season.

if he would have slipped through our hands and ended up in Milan or Inter in a few years and becomes the next big thing, you people would be cursing Secco for not spending cash on him.

 

[Turk_Bianconero]

I love how some you guys decided that this kid is not worth it, when most of you haven't seen him play. This kid was probably sccouted by guys like Ferrara. If the managment thinks he's good, then he must be good. My point is that we should not pass judgement until we see him play next season.

if he would have slipped through our hands and ended up in Milan or Inter in a few years and becomes the next big thing, you people would be cursing Secco for not spending cash on him.

This is completely true

 

[AngelaL]

sounds a bit pricey for a relatively unproven defender, just hope he is worth it. Lets face it, he can't be any less reliable than good old Jean-Alain.

Good to hear we are actually interested in young, Italian players and not just every foreigner under the sun which is how it has seemed lately.

Especially as there was some talk earlier about teams having to have a certain number of native players in them.

This whole co-ownership thing needs to stop. You buy a complete player FFS.

Owning half a player is a bit silly, especially as it can be a source of arguments between clubs.

well, i saw him a few times and i was impressed but not that impressed. Its alot of many for young criscito.
But I dont mind putting up that kind of money for a good player and there is alot of potential in the kid.

However my problem is with Secco, now our player could be helping another team challenge us for promotion. WHY is that? why isnt he here now or even in freaking Verona or Siena on loan.

Genoa r our direct opponents for promotion, and hes playing for them.

Even if we hadn't bought Genoa's half of Criscito, surely we should have been given him right away? After all, if we already owned half of him, & Genoa have used him in their team for the first half of the season, then we should have been entitled to have him in OUR team for the second half of the season.:eyebrows:

 

[Belgico]

Good news

He is next great defender of Italy

Lets hope so..

 

[roberto*baggio]

a good add for the bench but i doubt he becomede a pitch player he needs to work on his physicals (if it was my choice i would sign cannini and bovo of itlay U-21)

 

[V. Corleone]

I can't give a fair opinion about Criscito but I do think that 5 million euros for just his half ownership is a massive bid unless the guy is expected to become a legend.

 

[JuveGER]

For me these italian transfer games are really strange. It's kind of funny to look on some biographies of young players who sometimes play for 4 teams in 3 seasons but never for the club who has the ownership; plus these co-ownerships that don't really make much sense for me. But well, I guess that's a cultural thing. In Germany things like this are completely unthinkable (if not even not allowed). Here young players often start for the second teams of the bigger clubs. They usually play in the 3rd division. Loan deals exist, but not even nearly as much as in Italy. Italian deals like "You get 1 youngster, 2 co-ownerships, 3 million euros, 2 horses and 34,5kg pasta" never happen.. And honestly, to send (young) players all around Italy from club to club and to often change the ownership situation seems kind of wrong to me.

 

[V. Corleone]

For me these italian transfer games are really strange. It's kind of funny to look on some biographies of young players who sometimes play for 4 teams in 3 seasons but never for the club who has the ownership; plus these co-ownerships that don't really make much sense for me. But well, I guess that's a cultural thing. In Germany things like this are completely unthinkable (if not even not allowed). Here young players often start for the second teams of the bigger clubs. They usually play in the 3rd division. Loan deals exist, but not even nearly as much as in Italy. Italian deals like "You get 1 youngster, 2 co-ownerships, 3 million euros, 2 horses and 34,5kg pasta" never happen.. And honestly, to send (young) players all around Italy from club to club and to often change the ownership situation seems kind of wrong to me.

I prefer a player to be raised and to grow in one team to seeing him changing his club every year. But, the point here is that this is nearly happened in big clubs like Juventus. For example, if Juve have 4 or 5 youngsters and those players can't represent the first team now because the team needs some well experienced players, so they send them on loan.

Although, I can see your point.