Criscito 100% Juve (4 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cuti

The Real MC
Jul 30, 2006
13,517
#61
co-ownerships are like first options on promising youngsters. For example: If Foggia have a really interesting prospect, but still isnt proven, Juve can buy half his contract for 500K, then after 2 or 3 years if he has improved and all the clubs want him they have two choices, either buy out the other 50% for less than the others for example 1 million, or else we can sell the contracts separately to any club for 750K. But if we do not sell it and Foggia does, we still have 50% of his contract and then at the end of the following year, if one of the clubs does not buy the other half, they put in blind bids for the player, the highest bid wins, like an auction, and if the offers are equal it is delayed for a year
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

JuveGER

Senior Member
Mar 10, 2006
680
#62
I prefer a player to be raised and to grow in one team to seeing him changing his club every year. But, the point here is that this is nearly happened in big clubs like Juventus. For example, if Juve have 4 or 5 youngsters and those players can't represent the first team now because the team needs some well experienced players, so they send them on loan.
I understand that. That's why I prefer a system where big teams have a second squad in a lower but still competetive division. They can do training with the big stars and get playing experience in third division. These second teams are a mixture of young talents, older players who still have desire to play and want to earn some money playing football and first team players who were injured for some time and need playing experience. So young talents also learn a lot playing side by side with these players. Occasionly they get first team experience as substitutes, in cup games or friendlies. Often the second teams even copy the playing system of the first team so that the younger players can adapt to it. Loans still exist, Phillip Lahm for example was at one point far too good to play for Bayerns second team so he was loaned out to Stuttgart, but players in Germany spend by far less time on loan that players in Italy. I prefer that.
 

V. Corleone

Junior Member
Jan 26, 2007
92
#63
I understand that. That's why I prefer a system where big teams have a second squad in a lower but still competetive division. They can do training with the big stars and get playing experience in third division. These second teams are a mixture of young talents, older players who still have desire to play and want to earn some money playing football and first team players who were injured for some time and need playing experience. So young talents also learn a lot playing side by side with these players. Occasionly they get first team experience as substitutes, in cup games or friendlies. Often the second teams even copy the playing system of the first team so that the younger players can adapt to it. Loans still exist, Phillip Lahm for example was at one point far too good to play for Bayerns second team so he was loaned out to Stuttgart, but players in Germany spend by far less time on loan that players in Italy. I prefer that.
I agree with you. But let's stick our talk just to Juventus in the next example, we haven't had lots of talented youngsters in the previous few years. However, sending promising youngsters on loan to the same level where you play (to Serie A) is more beneficial than sending them to a lower division (like Serie B or C). This how things work, but if there are no higher divisions teams that are available to send our players to, so, definitely, I prefer them not to be loaned.
 

Cuti

The Real MC
Jul 30, 2006
13,517
#71
Juventus coach Deschamps defends Criscito price-tag
January 27, 2007

Juventus coach Didier Deschamps has played down the hefty price-tag of new signing Domenico Criscito.

Juve shelled out £5 million for the youngster, though the deal was offset with Andrea Masiello and Abdoulay Konko moving to Genoa in the opposite direction.

"This is the market. The value of a player is set by the importance that clubs give to them and for Criscito there were many offers," said Deschamps. "He has grown here, we already had 50 per cent of him and now he is doing very well with Genoa.

"We need to keep our good young players, with the future in mind.

"I think he's more of a central defender than a fullback, but he can play also on the flank, maintaining his defensive duties."
 

Luftwaffles

Il terzo uomo
Dec 1, 2005
5,055
#74
Remebering what the board said was available to spend last month.

20m € on builing work
30m € on players

Enough I suggest to shell out on Barzagli and two others.
 
OP

Mark

The Informer
Administrator
Dec 19, 2003
97,660
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #75
    Remebering what the board said was available to spend last month.

    20m € on builing work
    30m € on players

    Enough I suggest to shell out on Barzagli and two others.

    I read today, 35m €. :eyebrows:
     
    OP

    Mark

    The Informer
    Administrator
    Dec 19, 2003
    97,660
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #76
    I think the Secco/Criscito bashers will laugh in a year or 2 when Criscito will be Serie A's best defender and Cannavaro's replacement in the NT. :thumbs:

    I hope I'm right. :oops:

    Don't forget Paolucci and cie. :tup:
     

    Ahmedios

    Senior Member
    Nov 11, 2006
    5,107
    #77
    luftwaffles said:
    Remebering what the board said was available to spend last month.

    20m € on builing work
    30m € on players

    Enough I suggest to shell out on Barzagli and two others.
    What is the meaning of building the team? I think it is equal to buying new players. :confused2:

    mark77 said:
    I read today, 35m €.
    I read it as well and I hope it'll be £35m instead. ;)

    Edit: Official: I'm a Primavera player now. :oops:
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 4)