Coronavirus (COVID-19 Outbreak) (38 Viewers)

lgorTudor

Senior Member
Jan 15, 2015
32,951
Talking about quota, these mass vaccination centers in here are pushing the second Pfizer jab after only 3 weeks as opposed to the recommended 6-8, just to fulfill it. Three different practitioners my family are friends with strongly advised against such a short break between jabs.
https://www.smh.com.au/world/europe...t-week-gap-between-doses-20210723-p58cgu.html

And our government went straight up full despot by declaring that everybody is required a test for literally every indoor-ish thing IF incidence goes above 35. Why 35? Stop asking questions mkay. Added bonus: tests are no longer free of charge come October. It's not like they're already funded out of a taxpayer's pocket...oh wait.

They are patriot acting the shit of out this situation. In 3 years: Sorry Sir you can't shop here, as this app shows you haven't taken your supervised mid july to august follow up antiandrogen pill. Also Sir, it appears what you are behind on your monthly syria-reparation payments. We must unfortunately report this to the Ministry of Truth.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com
Last edited:

IliveForJuve

Burn this club
Jan 17, 2011
18,935
Talking about quota, these mass vaccination centers in here are pushing the second Pfizer jab after only 3 weeks as opposed to the recommended 6-8, just to fulfill it. Three different doctors my family talked to all strongly advised against such a short break betweenthe jabs.
https://www.smh.com.au/world/europe...t-week-gap-between-doses-20210723-p58cgu.html

And our government went straight up full despot by declaring that everybody is required a test for literally every indoor-ish thing IF incidence goes above 35. Why 35? Stop asking questions mkay. Added bonus: tests are no longer free of charge come October. It's not like they're already funded out of a taxpayer's pocket...oh wait.

They are patriot acting the shit of out this situation. In 3 years: Sorry Sir you can't shop here, as this app shows you haven't taken your supervised mid july to august follow up antiandrogen pill. Also Sir, it appears what you are behind on your monthly syria-reparation payments. We must unfortunately report this to the Ministry of Truth.
Everyone in the US got their second Pfizer dose after 21 days lol. It's the recommended administration by Pfizer.
 
Last edited:

Ronn

Senior Member
May 3, 2012
20,923
Talking about quota, these mass vaccination centers in here are pushing the second Pfizer jab after only 3 weeks as opposed to the recommended 6-8, just to fulfill it. Three different doctors my family talked to all strongly advised against such a short break between jabs.
https://www.smh.com.au/world/europe...t-week-gap-between-doses-20210723-p58cgu.html

And our government went straight up full despot by declaring that everybody is required a test for literally every indoor-ish thing IF incidence goes above 35. Why 35? Stop asking questions mkay. Added bonus: tests are no longer free of charge come October. It's not like they're already funded out of a taxpayer's pocket...oh wait.

They are patriot acting the shit of out this situation. In 3 years: Sorry Sir you can't shop here, as this app shows you haven't taken your supervised mid july to august follow up antiandrogen pill. Also Sir, it appears what you are behind on your monthly syria-reparation payments. We must unfortunately report this to the Ministry of Truth.
I got my second dose after 3 weeks. Can you ask your family doctors if I’m in danger?
 

lgorTudor

Senior Member
Jan 15, 2015
32,951
Everyone in the US got their second Pfizer dose after 21 days lol. It's the recommend administration by Pfizer.
Not an argument
The US are basically an animal farm at this point and in this particular case Pfizer is just a glorified (((sales))) department of Germany-based BioNtech who developed the vaccine. Also American pharma isn't very likely to look out for you. Local Robert Koch Institute as well as the Vaccination Committee as well as most practitioners have been recommending 6 weeks and it has been the standard in Europe.
 
Last edited:

Buck Fuddy

Lara Chedraoui fanboy
May 22, 2009
10,895
Btw @Buck Fuddy 3g is already somewhat old. Spahn wants 2g next.

Means he wants to lock out non vaccinated people from restaurants and festivals and all kinds of group events - EVEN if they test negative before it. Madness.
I don't know if that's madness. Depends on how you look at it, I guess.

From a personal perspective, it definitely is madness. You attend the group event unvaccinated & expose yourself to the risk. You might end up in hospital. Fair enough, your choice.
From a society based perspective, it sadly does make a bit of sense. Because if more unvaccinated people attend the event, more people expose themselves to the risk. More people might end up in hospital. Which in turn could lead to new/more restrictions, etc.
It always comes down to the same thing: one individual being affected vs society as a whole being affected.


I do want to add that things like vaccine passports (in general life, obviously not when travelling) should be a short term solution. How long exactly, I obviously don't know.
But I really am convinced that there only 2 options for the time being:
- You don't allow certain things, like for example group events.
or
- You allow group events, but access is limited to those who are "safe".
Neither option is ideal, but I'm going to opt for the 2nd one.
 

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
89,029
I don't know if that's madness. Depends on how you look at it, I guess.

From a personal perspective, it definitely is madness. You attend the group event unvaccinated & expose yourself to the risk. You might end up in hospital. Fair enough, your choice.
From a society based perspective, it sadly does make a bit of sense. Because if more unvaccinated people attend the event, more people expose themselves to the risk. More people might end up in hospital. Which in turn could lead to new/more restrictions, etc.
It always comes down to the same thing: one individual being affected vs society as a whole being affected.


I do want to add that things like vaccine passports (in general life, obviously not when travelling) should be a short term solution. How long exactly, I obviously don't know.
But I really am convinced that there only 2 options for the time being:
- You don't allow certain things, like for example group events.
or
- You allow group events, but access is limited to those who are "safe".
Neither option is ideal, but I'm going to opt for the 2nd one.
"safe" is the key word there.
 

ALC

Ohaulick
Oct 28, 2010
46,542
Talking about quota, these mass vaccination centers in here are pushing the second Pfizer jab after only 3 weeks as opposed to the recommended 6-8, just to fulfill it. Three different doctors my family talked to all strongly advised against such a short break between jabs.
https://www.smh.com.au/world/europe...t-week-gap-between-doses-20210723-p58cgu.html

And our government went straight up full despot by declaring that everybody is required a test for literally every indoor-ish thing IF incidence goes above 35. Why 35? Stop asking questions mkay. Added bonus: tests are no longer free of charge come October. It's not like they're already funded out of a taxpayer's pocket...oh wait.

They are patriot acting the shit of out this situation. In 3 years: Sorry Sir you can't shop here, as this app shows you haven't taken your supervised mid july to august follow up antiandrogen pill. Also Sir, it appears what you are behind on your monthly syria-reparation payments. We must unfortunately report this to the Ministry of Truth.
Akshully, the tests will still be free for vaccinated people, it’s just the undesirables…I mean unvaccinated people that will have to pay out of pocket
 

AFL_ITALIA

MAGISTERIAL
Jun 17, 2011
31,832
Israeli health ministry said same data showed Pfizer still had 88% effectiveness against hospitalization and 91% effectiveness against severe illness. But that was conveniently left out of that post. Lol

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/23/del...ective-in-israel-prevents-severe-illness.html
This is great news, and I'm not sure why this is the first time I'm hearing about it. This should be everywhere. I don't understand how anyone can be against the vaccines at this point.
 

ALC

Ohaulick
Oct 28, 2010
46,542
This is great news, and I'm not sure why this is the first time I'm hearing about it. This should be everywhere. I don't understand how anyone can be against the vaccines at this point.
it’s unnecessary when you’re young and healthy and they weren’t gonna die anyways. That’s the replies I’ve gotten when wondering the same

there’s other theories that think it’s a govt/big corporation mind control tool but idk how many people believe that

- - - Updated - - -

Oh yeah, it’s also not FDA approved
 

AFL_ITALIA

MAGISTERIAL
Jun 17, 2011
31,832
it’s unnecessary when you’re young and healthy and they weren’t gonna die anyways. That’s the replies I’ve gotten when wondering the same

there’s other theories that think it’s a govt/big corporation mind control tool but idk how many people believe that

- - - Updated - - -

Oh yeah, it’s also not FDA approved
Almost every single person on this forum has I'm sure been vaccinated for things less lethal than COVID and seem pretty ok with that.

Nobody in that crowd really gives a shit about the last point, it will be probably by next month anyway.

- - - Updated - - -

California now requiring teachers to get vaccinated or take weekly tests.
 

Post Ironic

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2013
42,253
it’s unnecessary when you’re young and healthy and they weren’t gonna die anyways. That’s the replies I’ve gotten when wondering the same

there’s other theories that think it’s a govt/big corporation mind control tool but idk how many people believe that

- - - Updated - - -

Oh yeah, it’s also not FDA approved
Almost every single person on this forum has I'm sure been vaccinated for things less lethal than COVID and seem pretty ok with that.

Nobody in that crowd really gives a shit about the last point, it will be probably by next month anyway.

- - - Updated - - -

California now requiring teachers to get vaccinated or take weekly tests.
Gonna be FDA approved in September unless they find something problematic that we haven’t yet seen.

I’d imagine majority of people saying it’s not safe and is an experiment because it’s not FDA approved are just going to shift goalposts and pivot to some other reason why they won’t take it, because they are mostly intellectually dishonest clowns anyways.
 

Enron

Tickle Me
Moderator
Oct 11, 2005
75,666
Almost every single person on this forum has I'm sure been vaccinated for things less lethal than COVID and seem pretty ok with that.

Nobody in that crowd really gives a shit about the last point, it will be probably by next month anyway.

- - - Updated - - -

California now requiring teachers to get vaccinated or take weekly tests.
That ddt and dat mmr boyeee


Plus that Rollie Pollie shot
 

Siamak

╭∩╮( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)╭∩╮
Aug 13, 2013
18,560
Talking about quota, these mass vaccination centers in here are pushing the second Pfizer jab after only 3 weeks as opposed to the recommended 6-8, just to fulfill it. Three different practitioners my family are friends with strongly advised against such a short break between jabs.
https://www.smh.com.au/world/europe...t-week-gap-between-doses-20210723-p58cgu.html

And our government went straight up full despot by declaring that everybody is required a test for literally every indoor-ish thing IF incidence goes above 35. Why 35? Stop asking questions mkay. Added bonus: tests are no longer free of charge come October. It's not like they're already funded out of a taxpayer's pocket...oh wait.
It’s getting increasingly difficult to trust governmental medical experts .
 

AFL_ITALIA

MAGISTERIAL
Jun 17, 2011
31,832
Gonna be FDA approved in September unless they find something problematic that we haven’t yet seen.

I’d imagine majority of people saying it’s not safe and is an experiment because it’s not FDA approved are just going to shift goalposts and pivot to some other reason why they won’t take it, because they are mostly intellectually dishonest clowns anyways.
I think this is perhaps where it really starts at its core for me. Why is it assumed that a new vaccine, something designed to prevent harm and developed with hundreds of years of knowledge, would cause more harm than a new virus, something naturally (or even perhaps artificially as some of the same crowd would also have you believe) evolved to cause you harm?

"You don't know the long term effects of the vaccine" would probably be the reply, but then how could you also know the long term effects of the virus and disease? We already know "long COVID" and circulatory issues are a thing, but even that is unknown. Viruses cause all types of issues longterm, even without killing you. Herpes simplex 1 causes mouth sores. Varicella zoster can become shingles after being dormant in the body for decades. HPV can cause cancers. It could end up being nothing, but it could also be anything. Why is THAT the chosen and acceptable risk to take instead of the vaccine that has already been given to 4.5 billion people? After the risk associated with contracting the virus itself of course. It's frustrating.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 13)