[CL] JUVENTUS 1-3 Barcelona (June 6th, 2015) (36 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mister

Senior Member
Apr 4, 2014
5,742
Sorry, but a ball put into the net with a hand regardless of intention will never be allowed if the ref sees it. It never has been and never will be allowed. Hence the reason Neymar tried to claim to the ref that the ball hit his shoulder and not his hand.

The rule states what it does, but Neymar's hand was in the air, out from his body, in direct path of the ball. his hand was in a position to cause a hand ball.

The vast majority of handball penalties aren't intentional or deliberate. A player gets unlucky with having their arm extended. It's almost never that they intentionally move it toward the ball.

So either that rule you posted is incomplete or the referees never actually follow it, because their are very very few actually deliberate handballs

And Neymar's handball goal completely fits into the arm extended from the body, changing the flight of the ball to cause it to score. That's always been whistled and always will be.
Just because you score from the ball hitting your hand doesn't make it handball. That's not how the rule works. It doesn't matter what the result is all that matters is whether it's deliberate.

His hand is in a natural position when the ball strikes it.

 

Post Ironic

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2013
41,973
Just because you score from the ball hitting your hand doesn't make it handball. That's not how the rule works. It doesn't matter what the result is all that matters is whether it's deliberate.

His hand is in a natural position when the ball strikes it.

His hand is in the air extended away from his body.

If all that matters is that it is deliberate than 90% of handball penalties shouldn't be called as it's incredibly rare that a player deliberately moves his hand/arm to block the ball on purpose. 90% of handballs are players having an arm extended and getting unlucky that the ball hits it. Nay, not just penalties, handballs called anywhere on the pitch.

That's how the games called. It may say "deliberate" in the FIFA rules but it clearly isn't the case with how refs actually call handballs. Neymar's handball is whistled 100% of the time.

This isn't even a debate. Your reading the rule literally and ignoring how referees actually call the rule, which is handball regardless of intention of the arm is extended from the body.
 

KingGale

Il Barone
Dec 24, 2012
1,152
As per fifa rules neymar's goal was legit. The handball did change the flight of the ball but it wasn't deliberate.
People are still debating this? Definitely a handball. Intent doesn't only mean that the player intended to do it at the moment, it also means that they left their arm or hand extended out knowing that the ball might hit it. Very few defenders who concede a handball penalty actively intends to do it. But they are penalized anyway because they didn't take precautions and had placed their hands or arms at a position where the ball might hit them.

It's exactly the same with Neymar. How is this not apparent to everyone who has watched more than a few matches of football I don't understand.
 

Post Ironic

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2013
41,973
It was the same with the Thierry Henry handball against Ireland. That wasn't a "deliberate" handball. He didn't make an attempt to move his hand to the ball. The ball ricocheted and hit his extended hand.

It didn't stop an international uproar, and Ireland considering suing FIFA for a replay of the match. And certainly was considered an illegal handball just like Neymar's.
 

Mister

Senior Member
Apr 4, 2014
5,742
His hand is in the air extended away from his body.

If all that matters is that it is deliberate than 90% of handball penalties shouldn't be called as it's incredibly rare that a player deliberately moves his hand/arm to block the ball on purpose. 90% of handballs are players having an arm extended and getting unlucky that the ball hits it. Nay, not just penalties, handballs called anywhere on the pitch.

That's how the games called. It may say "deliberate" in the FIFA rules but it clearly isn't the case with how refs actually call handballs. Neymar's handball is whistled 100% of the time.

This isn't even a debate. Your reading the rule literally and ignoring how referees actually call the rule, which is handball regardless of intention of the arm is extended from the body.
How is that arm extended?, that is perfectly normal position for a header.

Cakir actually allowed the goal, it was the ref behind the goal that called the handball.
 

Hist

Founder of Hism
Jan 18, 2009
11,408
wat? we were robbed a CL title. should we not talk about it
Nothing was robbed. We were not the better team. We lost. This hyperbole is what Inter and Roma fans are all about.

The incidents arent half as controversial as Gol De Muntari or the Roma match and even then you asked their fans to stop moping.

Stop moping.
 

zizinho

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2013
51,816
Nothing was robbed. We were not the better team. We lost. This hyperbole is what Inter and Roma fans are all about.

The incidents arent half as controversial as Gol De Muntari or the Roma match and even then you asked their fans to stop moping.

Stop moping.
:sergio:

penalty at 1-1 not called. if we scored that penalty we would win the game most likely. we conceded the 2-1 on a counter after a clear foul on Pogba. the game was decided by the ref, regardless of who was "better". clearly robbed
 

Post Ironic

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2013
41,973
How is that arm extended?, that is perfectly normal position for a header.

Cakir actually allowed the goal, it was the ref behind the goal that called the handball.
Cakir was behind him and didn't see it hit his hand obviously. Hence the reason for extra officials. So that type of stuff is seen. Your arguing something entirely stupid that is 100% called differently than you are saying.

And this is the exact reason Neymar was arguing that the ball hit his shoulder. His hand was in the air, extended out in front of his body in a position very likely for the ball to hit. And how exactly is that a normal position. Most players keep their hands down when they jump to head a ball. Neymar put his hands in the air, the ball struck them, handball.

Always called when seen. 100%. The fact you're arguing this is ridiculous
 

Juventino[RUS]

Senior Member
Mar 9, 2006
29,039
Ye, and it wasnt offside on Mijatovic goal in 1998, i think you can find explanation for every mistake that every referee have ever made against us

and it was 191q234-82359% penalty on James and on Ramos in our previous CL company, ye ye

When was the last time when the referee was on our side in every 50/50 situation inside the box?
 

Post Ironic

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2013
41,973
Nothing was robbed. We were not the better team. We lost. This hyperbole is what Inter and Roma fans are all about.

The incidents arent half as controversial as Gol De Muntari or the Roma match and even then you asked their fans to stop moping.

Stop moping.
Shut the fuck up, man.

The CL final was yesterday. Not 3 months ago. This holier than thou attitude is what's really pathetic.

Oooo. Look at me. I'm not complaining about referee errors the day of and the day after the game. I'm so amazing and so objective. What you guys are doing is whining and complaining about others being pissed off about the ref mistakes, and that's equally as obnoxious.

It hasn't been 3 months. Pretty much no one has said that its the only reason we lost, just that it was a big factor in shifting the momentum of the game. Which it objectively, clearly was. It hasn't been 3 months. We're not whining about this a whole season later. It's been 1 day. So you guys should really just shut the fuck up about this. This isn't at all like Milan, Roma, Inter crying about these things for 3 years after the fact. don't even try to compare it. It's 1 day. Yes. 1 day.
 

Hist

Founder of Hism
Jan 18, 2009
11,408
:sergio:

penalty at 1-1 not called. if we scored that penalty we would win the game most likely. we conceded the 2-1 on a counter after a clear foul on Pogba. the game was decided by the ref, regardless of who was "better". clearly robbed
We were dominated throughout the first half completely with the whole team having a nervous breakdown and Vidal really testing the Referee's patience. Apart from 15 minutes or so, we were dominated in the second half too (but not as badly). If it wasn't for Buffon's fantastic saves and the near misses by Suarez and co we would have lost by a greater score. The penalty is far from a clear one and only looking at replays carefully we can tell that it would have been a soft call not a blatant foul. The 15 minutes or so that we were better during exposed us to the counters that killed the game.

15 minutes of domination in an otherwise battering don't make you d/eserve to win. We didn't even create proper chances almost at all.
You say we were robbed despite all of this as if we deserved to win the game and that the ref's maliciousness (not incompetence) is why we didn't win. This is just false.
Not calling a difficult to see soft penalty + a foul + ignoring Vidal's rash behavior don't make a good case for a conspiring referee. Cancelling Neymar's goal (rightfully imo) also doesn't point towards a bought referee. Robbed is definitely too strong of a word to describe what happened in the match.
 

Juventino[RUS]

Senior Member
Mar 9, 2006
29,039
We were dominated throughout the first half completely with the whole team having a nervous breakdown and Vidal really testing the Referee's patience. Apart from 15 minutes or so, we were dominated in the second half too (but not as badly). If it wasn't for Buffon's fantastic saves and the near misses by Suarez and co we would have lost by a greater score. The penalty is far from a clear one and only looking at replays carefully we can tell that it would have been a soft call not a blatant foul. The 15 minutes or so that we were better during exposed us to the counters that killed the game.

15 minutes of domination in an otherwise battering don't make you d/eserve to win. We didn't even create proper chances almost at all.
You say we were robbed despite all of this as if we deserved to win the game and that the ref's maliciousness (not incompetence) is why we didn't win. This is just false.
Not calling a difficult to see soft penalty + a foul + ignoring Vidal's rash behavior don't make a good case for a conspiring referee. Cancelling Neymar's goal (rightfully imo) also doesn't point towards a bought referee. Robbed is definitely too strong of a word to describe what happened in the match.
And barcelona created what? Of of the box opportuties?
 

Fr3sh

Senior Member
Jul 12, 2011
36,953
Am I the only one who feels that the penal on Pogba is a 50/50 call? Whatever he did the team left unfavored by his call would have legitimate reasons for being upset.
He got body slammed by Alves while in possession....if it were Marchisio or Pereyra, anybody that wasn't as physically as imposing as Pogba, I think it might've been called.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 35)