[CL] Champions League 2010/11 (16 Viewers)

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,575
Apart from the red, I agree that the ref had a good game all in all. Pedro and Busquets must have been booked for simulating face punching (how disgusting it was) and Marcello for stepping on Pedro's foot but the ref obviously didn't see those incidents.

Boring game it was, I couldn't believe it was a CL semi I was watching with two of the best teams in the world playing. Again a reason why I missed the good old football of some years ago with Zizou and Ronaldo still been playing.

I know how you guys here hate English teams, and, as much as I dislike them myself, I have to admit that they are playing a way more fair style of football than the Spanish bigs.
I'm numb to diving and playacting, its so common in football and has been for quite a while, especially in high stake games, players try ANYTHING (and dontfool yourselves into thinking its limited to certain teams, more of football cultures). For example, I hardly ever see Pedro dive, but tonight he's in the box and Marcelo gets a clean tackle, and he throws himself theatrically, then later covers his face when he was bodycheck fouled etc. Trying anything possible to get ahead/mind games with refs etc.

I wont bother mentionning Alves (didnt dive, but exaggerated the severity of the tackle, which is most common thing of all for players), Dive Maria and most heinously of all, Biscuits (such a weasel, can imagine he gave Pedro tips). All 3 notorious weasels. IMO the ref handled them well enough (except Di Maria got a freekick once), because mostly they exaggerated fouls, not invent them. Its harder to give yellow in such scenario, and such a violatile game, giving yellows for playacting will fuel it more (though Uefa IMO should deal with em...).

Regarding the game, CL games get INSANELY tedious the closer they get to the final, its nothing new (most hated was Pool-Chelski...), but Real seriously had no intention of going for goal (29% possession and not doing anything but 1 Ronaldo shot is not lack of quality, but will, mainly 2nd half, first they pressured high, but 2nd barely at all), and Barca were attempting to play it out as an ok away tie, and wait for mistakes insanely boringly patient. And it took one mistake, not the 2nd goal(brilliant shit, kinda moments is why we watch big games, sadly only one) but the first one. I know we like to mock Marcelo, but he has improved his defending with Mourinho, and the split second mistake on the first goal is he gave Affellay momentum to pass him by losing his balance very briefly (then stood up and chased), and Affellay bit on that like cheetah (great assist). In general Marcelo, most of this season, handled his defensive duty decently. But its typical such a brief error decides the tie (Messi's brilliant 2nd closed the tie, but hard to see it happening without 1st goal).
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
54,065
it's amazing how Messi avoids the most obvious yellow cards just because he acknoledges the fouls.Is there any ref with balls to show him a freakin card?
He also elbowed someone when he was down, but it too went unnoticed by the refs.
The man simply has to be perfect and not a single black mark should stand in his resume. Now if he only comes out and starts talking like Kaka about God and shit, he'll be the epitome of perfection.

The guy is a great player and that should be enough. Protect him from tackles too if you want. But why are they so unfair to ignore the bad things he does? It won't ruin his reputation if you card him when he deserves a card.
 

Oggy

and the Cockroaches
Dec 27, 2005
7,518
exactly the sob milked it really well to be honest, but he was'nt a lone did u notice how sergio was trying to go for the same cheap stunt he pulled last year??? or pedro who falls fromt he slightest contact and sets soem drama. for me the thing that i really hated was how barca continue to surround the refree its disgusting honestly its very disgusting.



:tup: exactly!!! that was really the game changer no doubt specially when u put into perspective the subs prior to his sending off with the removal of ozil and sending in of ade! so all in all barca would'nt have won had pepe been in the game and if they had won it would def be a hard fought 1-0. i think its very crazy to say real were losing in all cases thats just too much of a brag.

i was wondering was'nt mascherano at fault for the same tackle pepe had or they r different??? i'm asking bec i thought it was exactly the same and pepe should've had a yellow the same way mascherano got off with just a yellow card.
I was thinking the same, too bad I can't find that foul on Youtube...
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,575
Yeah, this video shows perfectly that Pepe's intention was the ball, but Alves was quicker.
Do you think only intended malicious tackles are red? Not clumsy very late tackles that were aiming for the ball, but incompetently take out legs? Because the later is more common scenario for red cards then the former. Only real thugs or really frustrated players due to the former.
 

blondu

Grazie Ale
Nov 9, 2006
27,408
He also elbowed someone when he was down, but it too went unnoticed by the refs.
The man simply has to be perfect and not a single black mark should stand in his resume. Now if he only comes out and starts talking like Kaka about God and shit, he'll be the epitome of perfection.

The guy is a great player and that should be enough. Protect him from tackles too if you want. But why are they so unfair to ignore the bad things he does? It won't ruin his reputation if you card him when he deserves a card.
saw that...that was after a tackle from behind from pepe
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
54,065
Real's plan was simple. They didn't intend to take initiative and they were waiting for counters.
The problem was that Barca wasn't interesting in scoring either and at one point we watched endless passing between Pique, Mascherano, Keita, Busquets...and back to Mascherano.
Barca not attacking screwed Real (if that was Guardiola's intention, then good job).
 

king Ale

Senior Member
Oct 28, 2004
21,689
blʘndu;3000441 said:
1st video : 1,2 no way, 3rd one was a cristal penalty...4 50-50 call..5 weak , no way you can give a penalty for that
2nd video: good goal
3rd goal : only rivaldo vs brazil can beat this
It was the most obvious one out there Alin. Pique clearly stopped the ball with his hand which wasn't in its normal state. It was a 100 percent penalty.
 

ALC

Ohaulick
Oct 28, 2010
46,562
After watching it in slo-mo, it definitely looks like he knew he wasn't going to get ti the ball and instead of pulling his foot back, he kinda tries to get to Alves. Look at 1:07, that looks intentional as fuck. He deserves a three-game ban too.
 
Aug 2, 2005
4,470
I'll have to repeat myself so I better not say anything.
We can only hope Moratti to send them to some serie B, because the way they control the refs is unreal.
:agree:
This match was a commedia dell'arte display.
:agree:
This was the biggest embaressment in the world of football right after Calciopoli.

Laughable and pathetic.
:agree:
:howler:

What a great thing I did missing on this joke of a match that was simply controlled by the cheaters to cheat their way yet to another final.
:agree:
Did you see how Adebayor was (rightfully) carded only 1 minute after Messi wasn't carded for the very same thing? After that I went by the window for a smoke, because there was no point watching this charade anymore.
:agree:
Serious question: Where would Barca be without the refs' help? It doesn't even surprise me anymore.
out against Arsenal in the quarter- Final

It's funny how they accuse everyone and every thing of playing dirty football but their players are rolling on the pitch covering their faces trying to influence the refs. What the hell was that by Pedro and Busquets?
:agree:
Pedro, Biscuits, Alves, Ineista ( even if he didn't play), Valdez, Pique, Boyuol
are whores

Barca have been constantly helped in the CL by referees in the last few years, like vs Chelsea in 2009, Arsenal this year, this game, just to name a few.
:agree:

So what? Show me a team on the planet who haven't had bad decisions giving for or against them in an important match, there isnt one.

Not a single club in a single league world wide.

Shit happens.
Yes, Ok, Shit happens, but it seems it is always in Barca's favor

Guys, concentrate on Barca fanboys and stop hunting manure fans. They are our friends now, at least until May 28th (and beyond if they beat the Catalan scum).
Forza Real to get some whores from Catalan suspended for the final, and then forza Man u. then fuck them all Barca, Real, Man U etc

Pepe's foul was never a straight red. NEVER! At most a 2nd yellow if he had one, which he didn't.

But that wasn't even the worse decision. For me the worse was Adebayor's yellow only a minute after Messi escaped a yellow for EXACTLY the same thing.
Arbeloa got a yellow for a bodycheck, exactly the same as one Barca player (don't remember who) made close to the end of the match. No yellow for the Barca guy.
None of the dives were punished, none of the ref pressure was punished.

There were only 2-3 of us here who were complaining about these thing. Now there are at least 20. So ignore me, Jack and Hoori and call us biased, but what are the others seeing? And more importantly, how on earth don't you see that over and over again it is Barcelona that gets help in CL, no matter if they play Milan, Chelsea, Real, Arsenal.
Yet they always escape that with the pathetic excuse that the other team was gonna lose anyway (even though they weren't losing at the moment) because Barca has 8758476736% possession.
Alen, Trequartista, Dule90, JCK, King Ale, you all are my heroes in this thread :snoop:
well said

Alen is my fav, he hates Barca, but also he is reasonable,
Messi should have been yellowed, Diving should have been punished, Pepe straight Red card was harsh

No hard feeling for the Barca fan boys, but your team tonight was AGAIN favored
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,575
Real's plan was simple. They didn't intend to take initiative and they were waiting for counters.
The problem was that Barca wasn't interesting in scoring either and at one point we watched endless passing between Pique, Mascherano, Keita, Busquets...and back to Mascherano.
Barca not attacking screwed Real (if that was Guardiola's intention, then good job).
They stopped pressing high too early in the game. Regardless of it being their home, if you want to do something in football, you should pressure and take it from your opponents. With how Real were clearing the ball after instantly getting it, they were clearly not intending even to counter. Except for a period of like 7-10 mins, they had no interest to do anything but give back the ball to Barca. It was a real weak effort by Mourinho IMO, even if this game could have ended 0-0, would still say the same. Plus their freekicks was disastrously wasteful, only chances they have to go forward, and Ronaldo and Alonso completely botches them.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,539
Real's plan was simple. They didn't intend to take initiative and they were waiting for counters.
The problem was that Barca wasn't interesting in scoring either and at one point we watched endless passing between Pique, Mascherano, Keita, Busquets...and back to Mascherano.
Barca not attacking screwed Real (if that was Guardiola's intention, then good job).
Yeah, completely right. As I said though I thought Jose's tactics were good in the first half with keeping a higher midfield line and pressuring up the pitch. That's what I like to see. Diarra was particularly good, hounding Barca whenever they crossed the 50. In the second half they lost the plot though, and didn't pressure as high. But indeed, since Barca sat back as well, I was expecting 0-0.

They needed to find a way to get Ronaldo the ball more, though. That's how they screwed up. Ronaldo was isolated and unfortunately you're not going to get anywhere by not having him in the game.
 

blondu

Grazie Ale
Nov 9, 2006
27,408
It was the most obvious one out there Alin. Pique clearly stopped the ball with his hand which wasn't in its normal state. It was a 100 percent penalty.
he wanted to get the ball to his chest but the ball hit him in the hand, i didn't saw the intention...when you're taking a ball on your chest you have the normal upper movement of the arms. At least that's what i'm figuring
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 16)