Board & Management (63 Viewers)
- Thread starter .zero
- Start date
i didnt put translation for the first tweet, because it doesnt make any sense what he writes there to me, but here u are:
(From an old edition of #Times dated March 1891)
“LONDON CELEBRATION: JACK THE RIPPER ACQUILT”
"THE LAZIO TAR SAYES HIM RIGHT: THE COMMUNICATION OF THE INVESTIGATION AGAINST HIM HAS BEEN NOTIFIED AT THE ADDRESS OF THE MOTHER"
“JUSTICE FINALLY” SAYS JACK
“JUBULATION AMONG THE FANS”
(From an old edition of #Times dated March 1891)
“LONDON CELEBRATION: JACK THE RIPPER ACQUILT”
"THE LAZIO TAR SAYES HIM RIGHT: THE COMMUNICATION OF THE INVESTIGATION AGAINST HIM HAS BEEN NOTIFIED AT THE ADDRESS OF THE MOTHER"
“JUSTICE FINALLY” SAYS JACK
“JUBULATION AMONG THE FANS”
he claims its fake interviews https://www.ilsussidiario.net/news/...lie-messo-alla-gogna-dopo-calciopoli/2240964/ :
Federal prosecutor Giuseppe Chiné has asked for another 20-day extension regarding the investigation into Juve 'salary manoeuvres' and 'suspicious partnerships' with other clubs.
Sporting code gives the federal prosecutor the possibility of being able to request the General Prosecutor's Office for Sport at CONI for 2 additional investigation times: 40 days (which expired yesterday) and 20 days (which they can ask for until the end of the month)
The federal prosecutor's office has reportedly received a 'copious amount of new documents from the Turin prosecutors' who are working on the Prisma investigation. It's unclear if the documentation will have any real impact on the course of the investigation.
In addition to the club, the players could also be at risk (FIGC Sporting Code of Justice provides for "at least one month of disqualification"), if they signed the alleged 'salary manoeuvre' agreements outside the permitted procedures. [GdS]
Sporting code gives the federal prosecutor the possibility of being able to request the General Prosecutor's Office for Sport at CONI for 2 additional investigation times: 40 days (which expired yesterday) and 20 days (which they can ask for until the end of the month)
The federal prosecutor's office has reportedly received a 'copious amount of new documents from the Turin prosecutors' who are working on the Prisma investigation. It's unclear if the documentation will have any real impact on the course of the investigation.
In addition to the club, the players could also be at risk (FIGC Sporting Code of Justice provides for "at least one month of disqualification"), if they signed the alleged 'salary manoeuvre' agreements outside the permitted procedures. [GdS]
blame tuttosport for this too:
everyone with a brain knows that this sentence stinks from every angle. it's italy so everything can still happen, but if you ignore the juve haters the general consensus is that this penalty should have not been awarded under any circumstances
in a normal country chiné should be removed from his position, figc president should resign and juve should sue for damages and win. now there's zero chance of this happening. but the points penalty might actually be removed, or at least the case might be returned to figc for reevaluation. not a single source, be it tuttosport or cds/gds expects the coni appeal committee to confirm the penalty.
everyone with a brain knows that this sentence stinks from every angle. it's italy so everything can still happen, but if you ignore the juve haters the general consensus is that this penalty should have not been awarded under any circumstances
in a normal country chiné should be removed from his position, figc president should resign and juve should sue for damages and win. now there's zero chance of this happening. but the points penalty might actually be removed, or at least the case might be returned to figc for reevaluation. not a single source, be it tuttosport or cds/gds expects the coni appeal committee to confirm the penalty.