Assassin's Creed III (2 Viewers)
- Thread starter Sheik Yerbouti
- Start date
OP
Its quite good, but imagine how 4 will be in next gen!
If you want a good hint, take a look at Ubisoft's next gen masterpiece, ladies and gents, the future:
http://watchdogs.ubi.com/watchdogsgame/en-gb/home/index.aspx
If you want a good hint, take a look at Ubisoft's next gen masterpiece, ladies and gents, the future:
http://watchdogs.ubi.com/watchdogsgame/en-gb/home/index.aspx
Game is really fucking glitchy.
Naval missions are so good. AC4 is going to amazing.
While I enjoy the frontier and the homestead, Boston & New York are just ugly as fuck. Give me Roma or Florence or Venice any day.
Conner is way too serious, Ezio is a much better character. IDK how they will ever come up with a main character that tops Ezio.
The modern day mission in Brazil was pretty cool.
They need to make an AC game based in 19th century Japan, as the modern world is creeping in (Templar influence) the Samurai (assassins) fight back.
I really miss the special missions in Ezio's series like the armor of brutus missions in AC: Brotherhood, large underground caverns to explore. Or the giant cathedrals. I know 18th century America didn't have any places like this, but that's also why I think it wasn't the best choice of setting for an AC game.
Anyways, these are just some random thoughts I have had while playing through AC3. I do like the game, the UI, hud, maps, combat are all superior to everything they have done before. But the setting and characters just don't hold up.
I would give the Ezio trilogy a 9/10 overall, compared to that AC3 gets a 8/10. It would be a 7/10 without the excellent naval missions.
Naval missions are so good. AC4 is going to amazing.
While I enjoy the frontier and the homestead, Boston & New York are just ugly as fuck. Give me Roma or Florence or Venice any day.
Conner is way too serious, Ezio is a much better character. IDK how they will ever come up with a main character that tops Ezio.
The modern day mission in Brazil was pretty cool.
They need to make an AC game based in 19th century Japan, as the modern world is creeping in (Templar influence) the Samurai (assassins) fight back.
I really miss the special missions in Ezio's series like the armor of brutus missions in AC: Brotherhood, large underground caverns to explore. Or the giant cathedrals. I know 18th century America didn't have any places like this, but that's also why I think it wasn't the best choice of setting for an AC game.
Anyways, these are just some random thoughts I have had while playing through AC3. I do like the game, the UI, hud, maps, combat are all superior to everything they have done before. But the setting and characters just don't hold up.
I would give the Ezio trilogy a 9/10 overall, compared to that AC3 gets a 8/10. It would be a 7/10 without the excellent naval missions.
Omg the chase lee mission fucking pisses me off. These kind of chase the bad guy while we throw every fucking obstacle possible in your way and give you zero room for mistakes really grinds my gears. Exploding barrel here, dumb ass civilians everywhere, ship on fire for no good reason. Ndjuiehsiskgzhusjhehzhd h. Rant over.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
OP
